Posted on 06/14/2004 2:41:55 PM PDT by swilhelm73
I have an argument with this. There are far too many modifiers in this sentence. The sentence should read "It was hard for the Islamic fascists to find ideological suppoirt in the West given their agenda of primordial barbarism."
We have known about Islam for many centuries. We'll all be better off when we allow ourselves to recognize that and act accordingly.
>>>"We'll all be better off when we allow ourselves to recognize that and act accordingly."
I have an argument with this. The sentence should read "We'll all be better off when we allow ourselves to rid the West of this Islamic menace.
Hoppy
I like your idea even better.
"We'll all be better off when we allow ourselves to rid the West of this Islamic menace.
That's why we're in Iraq.
bttt
Bump
He, once again, articulates the overt and less obvious nuances of the direction of America's and the West's war against Islamic terrorism. A must read.
Oh, and Bush? FOUR MORE YEARS!
BTT
I've been thinking about the solution to the kidnapping and execution of Americans for a while and today it hit me.
For every American kidnapped and executed, we will take
ten al quida members in our custody and harvest their
internal organs, their eyes will make infidels see,
their hearts, lungs, livers and kidneys will make infidels
live, their skin will be grown and used to cover the bomb scars caused by their shahida, and they themselves will never die all of a piece. So long virgins.
I would even put it about that science has come up with a way to take the smallest scraps of a homabombers remains
and use them to grow new organs to be transplanted into
Israeli victims. NO VIRGINS FOR YOU!
Am I too crazed?
Or am I too crazed for the Sitzkrieg?
Bwahahahahah!
Maybe a cold shower and some sleep, or just some cheese....
Oh, and Bush? FOUR MORE YEARS!Amen !
Hear the Donkey Bray
(RealPlayer)
[Expletive deleted] !!!
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
I have been waiting for some conservative pundit on TV or radio since 9/11 to ask one of these bleeding heart liberals to answer the question
How many more dead American civilians do you want to see?
If 3000 wasn't enough for Afganistan and Iraq would 30,000 be enough, how about 300,000.
How many dead Americans would it take for them to approve of going straight to the heart of darkness and ripping it out?
Several thousand would probably get their attention. Equally likely, attacks that threaten us all, bombings at shopping centers, restaurants, trains, buses, even with more limited casualties.
Of course once the left's attention is focused, you shouldn't assume you'll like their solutions. Likely more appeasement.
Excellent article. I just sent a letter to the WH regarding the latest kidnapping. We've got to start responding and making the Muslim terrorists - and, unforunately, the ignorant populations that support them - realize that this is no longer permissible.
They're kidnapping and killing Americans in the Middle East now. Having gotten away with it for several years, soon they'll be kidnapping and killing us in Europe, as well. Unless we respond, they will achieve their goal of making the world unsafe for Americans. (Or for non-Muslims, ultimately.)
ping for later
bttt
It can't be too much of VDH.
Victor Davis Hanson BTTT!
Victor Davis Hanson ping.
Although the name is very familiar
I regret to say
I don't know who is Victor Davis Hanson.
Is he someone famous?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.