You owe me.
Posted on 06/13/2004 1:31:13 PM PDT by Pikamax
Row over Kidman's film romp with youngster 10:31 BST, Sunday 13th June 2004 -- by Neil Wilkes Nicole Kidman has been caught up in a row over a new film which features her kissing a ten-year-old boy while naked.
In the movie, called Birth, Kidman plays a widow who believes the boy to be a reincarnation of her husband.
Two scenes in particular have come under fire; in both, Kidman and the boy - Canadian child actor Cameron Bright - are "completely naked and caressing each other." In one of them, there is a close-up of " a very passionate kiss" as they sit in the bathtub together.
"The last thing on earth Nicole needs is a movie which is going to be jumped on by sickos and used in some perverse way to promote paedophilia," a source told the Daily Star Sunday today. "But truth is, the publicity department is already describing the movie as a nightmare. The producers, director and Nicole herself are likely to face a lot of flack."
It will cost film studo New Line around $50 million if they decide to axe the movie altoegther.
I stand in profound agreement
Now I'm starting who wonder who was covering who in that relationship.
Hint #3: "mutual."
Are you trying to say that Nicole is, shall we say, more comfortable in the company of her "sisters."
Yes. As is Mr. Cruise's first wife.
You owe me.
Ah. "You don't scratch my back, I won't scratch yours."
Exactly.
Where and when did you hear that Kidman was a "rainbow girl?" I am not questioning the data, I merely curious as to when/where this information came to light since this is new to me. This due in large part to the fact that I do not much, if any, attention to the lives of Hollweird folks.
Shep Smith is 10 years old?
The actor who played the son was 21 and looked it. So the film was not that bad, more shocking was that Bebe did it with her best friend's son.
There was no phony hypocritical bull...from the films producer that assorted weirdos may misuse the movie
As usual, Hollywood makes me puke. I hope the producers lose BIG BUCKS on this trash.
Indeed, I hope they aren't called "Rainbow Girls." I was also a member of the Order of Rainbow for Girls growing up.
Do you know if yours still exists? My lodge went dark a few years back. Sadness.
Oh, very sorry. Since you were a member of the real Rainbow Girls, I apologise for the use of the term in an alternate meaning. How do you feel about the term "special sisters?"
To be honest, I did not that Tom had been married prior to Nicole. In reference to a prior post (re: "mutual"), were you stating that they were "masters of their domain" with one another? Or have I misread the meaning of your statement. BTW, what would we do without references to Seinfeld? :-)
Are these people idiots. Have they no sense of morals at all? Good grief. If the reports are true, there should be jail time over this.
Yup. Forget the niche markets - volume, volume, volume!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.