Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lesbian Moms a Growing U.S. Phenomenon (shameful attempt at mainstreaming alert)
Yahoo! News ^ | May 25, 2004 | Teresa Carson

Posted on 05/25/2004 2:04:59 PM PDT by El Conservador

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: El Conservador
Many lesbian couples also consider their children's well-being before they conceive, including the impact of not having a male role model in the home.

THIS IS PURE BRAVO SIERRA!!! The only thing these selfish, sexually depraved people think about is THEMSELVES!! They want to prove so badly that they can be "normal" that they will mess up the lives of children (who are nothing more than window dressing!)!

Couples also worry that their children would be teased at school or the playground.

Right! If they really cared about that, these sexual psychopaths wouldn't have the children! This wouldn't be an issue if they could bear their OWN children (without the use of a THIRD PARTY like they MUST do!)!

21 posted on 05/25/2004 2:47:32 PM PDT by Sister_T (Democrats AND The Partisan Press are the REAL enemies to freedom in the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
I'm so glad I stopped watching ER! 'His other mother'? How the heck does that work?

Me too. I had to check in to see what became of Dr. Ross' kids, but after that, I checked out. The show became a oh-so-diverse bed-hopping stew that bashed gun owners and pro-lifers, and I don't understand what the purpose was of whacking the arrogant doc's arm off.

22 posted on 05/25/2004 2:49:26 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EdReform


Make SURE you know your child's friends and meet their parents before you allow them to go home with them. We can no longer trust that everyone's lifestyle is like our own.


23 posted on 05/25/2004 2:50:12 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador

Can't wait till these little freaks (the children of gay "couples") grow up and start tellin' their maladjusted tales. Ain't enough Ritalin in the world to keep the truth from coming out, and it ain't gonna be pretty.


24 posted on 05/25/2004 2:55:17 PM PDT by searchandrecovery (Socialist America - diseased and dysfunctional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
Got one in my office. She adopted a child from China. She lied on the application in doing it. Answered a question about her marital status by saying she was single, but was not opposed to marriage in the future. What she forgot to state was that said marriage would be when she could marry her female partner. But, of course, the Chinese did not care, they wanted the money and rid of a female child.

Any doubt in your mind that that child is better off now?

I say, God bless anyone who adopts an unwanted child.

25 posted on 05/25/2004 2:55:41 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
I say, God bless anyone who adopts an unwanted child.

While there's certinly something in what you say, most lesbian couples are highly disfunctional compared to hetero couples. Domestic violence is greater, as is the incidence of other mental problems. Like lying to get the kid.

The only lesbian couple with a kid that I had extended contact with could in no way be decribed as normal. The biological mother was relatively normal, if a little smug. The butch was more macho than any three guys I know, always punching you on the arm, talking about how tough she was and how much she could press, etc. The poor little girl was sullen, silent and almost invisible.

I think giving a child to a lesbian couple is a very poor choice, in general. Especially a male child.

26 posted on 05/25/2004 3:10:29 PM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jimt
I think giving a child to a lesbian couple is a very poor choice, in general. Especially a male child.

Compared to leaving him in China?

27 posted on 05/25/2004 3:14:02 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
CHOOSING A DONOR

I heard of a scam in the Asheville area several years ago. Some homosexual women would seduce a man with a well paying job and get pregnant, then they would sock him for child support to support the homosexual "couple" raising the child.

28 posted on 05/25/2004 3:30:59 PM PDT by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius


"Totally ridiculous. History is full of women (sisters, mothers and grandmothers, friends, etc.) bringing up children alone because the children's fathers had died or left the family to go to war, or even because they were away at sea for decades."

Not ridiculous at all. It has been shown that children KNOW THE DIFFERENCE between a tragedy that can't be helped and a situation that flows from the parents selfishness.

"It is normal for children to be brought up by women. In traditional Christian and Jewish practice, it is also normal for a man to be part of this, but as a providing parent rather than a nuturing parent."

For most of the history of the world children had two parents. Your understanding of history doesn't go back to before the American century despite the fact that you cite Jewish history. The sad truth is that the feminist revolution took woman away from their kids but the forgotten part is that the Industrial Revolution took dad. Before that dads were very much a part of their kids world. Your placing greater emphasis upon the mothers role is a modern delusion.

"I am not saying there is anything wrong with a male parent who is more involved in the life of his kids. What I am saying is that these gay "activists" are trying to take a biological predisposition (women bring up children) and turn it into something sexual, which it is not and never had been."

I've read and re-read this last para and can make no sense of it at all.



29 posted on 05/25/2004 3:49:32 PM PDT by TalBlack ("Tal, no song means anything without someone else....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul

"Check this sh!t out" ping.


30 posted on 05/25/2004 3:50:57 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium . . . sed ego sum homo indomitus")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop; MHGinTN

ping


31 posted on 05/25/2004 3:54:39 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TalBlack

What I am saying is that women usually bring up children - it is only in this generation - which paradoxically probably has the most "single mothers" ever - that we have decided that the male parent is the nuturing parent and the female parent should be a providing parent, and that male and female parents are interchangeable.

I'm not saying that children should not have two parents of different sexes. What I am saying is that it is frequently women who bring up children after the men have died, left, or had some other disaster befall.

Sometimes they do it alone, but if they are lucky, they have help from other (female) relatives or friends.

It is only our generation that has converted this into something sexual.


32 posted on 05/25/2004 4:00:15 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel; El Conservador

Kids don't need pervert pseudo-parents or their plan to put all child custody in the hands of the government.

Kids need two parents--a father and a mother who is not rebellious against the old tenets of marriage.

Feminism/homosexual activism has been filthy from its beginnings. To the divorced mommy lobby and all its adherents: they all know where to go.

The truth about early feminism
http://familyops.us/anthonyproject/


33 posted on 05/25/2004 6:07:46 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell

"Some homosexual women would seduce a man with a well paying job and get pregnant, then they would sock him for child support to support the homosexual "couple" raising the child."

...which doesn't surprise me, either. Both political parties voted in favor of legislation like the Child Support Act and the VAWA to violate the constitutional rights of men and destroy the family. What draws politicians and influential constituents to cowtow to the witches? ...that smell, of course.


34 posted on 05/25/2004 6:13:10 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador

This has been the case in NYC for some time now. You see many lesbos with children, but very rarely do you see gay men with children.


35 posted on 05/25/2004 6:22:02 PM PDT by Clemenza (Strolling along country roads with my baby...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

Lesbians are 200% more likely to divorce than heterosexuals and gay men according to a survey in Sweden where gay marriage is legal.


36 posted on 05/25/2004 6:24:39 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
I have a master's degree in child development and I had to prove I was a fit parent. I had to sit there with this caseworker and tell her what we feed Dewey (their daughter) for breakfast," Gelnaw said.

She named her daughter Dewey? I guess that leaves Huey and Luey for the next kids, unless the Dewey has to due with a decimal system.

37 posted on 05/25/2004 6:27:53 PM PDT by Bernard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bernard
tell her what we feed Dewey ...

She named her child Dewey and then worries about the other kids making fun of her?

38 posted on 05/25/2004 7:51:36 PM PDT by jscd3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping - back on the job, I'm gone for a few hours and look what happens!

I'll read them all later tonight -

Open for comments!

Let me know if anyone wants on/off this pinglist.


39 posted on 05/25/2004 8:44:35 PM PDT by little jeremiah ("Gay Marriage" - a Weapon of Mass. Destruction!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
I don't understand what the purpose was of whacking the arrogant doc's arm off.

I think it was so ER could officially "jump the shark."

40 posted on 05/25/2004 8:50:08 PM PDT by Samwise (Kerry For President of France)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson