Posted on 05/20/2004 7:08:38 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln
There wasn't an outcome and that was the problem. I'm glad you tripped over my in-u-end-o.
Yes, the liberals are idiots on this, but...are you asserting that only the US can produce DDT for the 3rd world? There is no reason they cannot produce it for themselves. Now it is true that the liberals try to use the UN to prevent 3rd world countries from doing so, but considering they can produce drugs, guns, and anything else that is restricted or banned I see no reason why they can't make as much DDT as they want.
ONE....Nobody can screw all of us, and theirself, as well as one liberal.
Q: HOW MANY LIBERALS DOES IT TAKE TO SCREW IN A LIGHT BULB?
None, because liberals don't know how to screw things IN
they only know how to screw things UP
Permission to use this one?
Lookie ! Uncle Fester ! :^)
Two! ;O)
Hi, (((Meekie)))!
"Consider that if/when there is a WMD attack they'll just BLAME BUSH no matter what his policy is."
This is why they never think anything through - why should they - they'll just blame the GOP when their next policy fails.
It's not usually a life and death issue so they've been given a pass for decades to pursue their course of issues/but no workable solutions.
"HOW MANY LIBERALS DOES IT TAKE TO SCREW IN A LIGHT BULB? "
None.
They would prefer not to use electricity because electric plants pollute the atmosphere. They would probably feel the same way about fires.
I guess they would collect a bunch of fireflies and put them a glass bottle or use moon light.
Absolutely
Well I want to know now.
How many supply-siders does it take to change a lightbulb?
#39
Howdy !
You know the title of this thread is a REALLY LOADED question, LOL!
Of course they also said nothing when the Vietcong massacred thousands after we pulled out.
That's the key benefit to being a leftist! All that matters is your intentions. The results really don't matter. And of course, since leftists are the ones that are supposed to report those results (in the media), if it doesn't reflect well on their agenda, then why bother reporting it in the first place... They meant well, didn't they?
You've sited two major examples... Another would be oxygenated gas, specifically, MBTE in gasoline, for cleaner air... Never mind that it's poisoning the water!
Mark
This is the most inane comment I've ever heard. DDT was banned because it was found to have horrible environmental effects, namely the threat it posed to birds and their eggs. It has nothing to do with malaria. People have been dieing from malaria for millions of years and DDT clearly does not provide any solution. The problem with malaria is that because it is in predominately poor regions, pharmaceutical companies do not have any financial incentive to research for a cure.
It's interesting that you say that liberals are hard-headed and it's impossible to reason with them. Because the same could easily be said about conservatives from the liberal stand point. The fact of the matter is that both sides are so entrenched in their moral and political views that they rarely listen to the other side. Liberals and conservatives alike. When confronted about their views, both sides refuse to acknowledge any other ideas but their own.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
