Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Support for Bush, Iraq war dropping (Kerry 49% W 44% Nader 6%-W approval @ 46%)
cnn.com ^ | 05/14/04 | cnn.

Posted on 05/14/2004 2:00:26 PM PDT by KQQL

That development appears to be helping Sen. John Kerry, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee. He wins the support of 51 percent of likely voters, compared to 46 percent for Bush. In February, Bush was ahead of Kerry by two percentage points.

If Independent Ralph Nader is among the choices, Kerry gets 49 percent, Bush 44 percent and Nader 6 percent.

Bush's overall job approval rating fell from 49 percent to 46 percent since the last CNN/Time poll on April 8, while his disapproval rating rose from 47 percent to 49 percent -- the first time that more people disapproved of Bush's job performance than approved.

The poll was conducted by telephone Wednesday and Thursday.

The margin of error for the total sample of 1,001 adult Americans is 3.1 percentage points

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; cnnpollpuuleez; commienews; invalidsource; polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 321-324 next last
To: onyx; KQQL

I've been wondering if Soros has been buying up oil futures.....

Cavuto said that OPec is going to increase supply?


141 posted on 05/14/2004 2:53:57 PM PDT by ambrose (AP Headline: "Kerry Says His 'Family' Owns SUV, Not He")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

The bet is on to the first 5 who will take it.


142 posted on 05/14/2004 2:54:59 PM PDT by John Lenin (Never trust a traitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Carter had the "stagflation" and "misery index" albatrosses, as well as hostages in Iran and a rather pointed lack of scintillating, optimistic personality. Remember the "malaise" speech? He might as well just have shot his foot off right then and there. We just didn't want to hear that kind of wallowing from our supposed "leader".

But you're right, it's stupid to vote on the basis of gasoline prices. I know full well that's not under Bush's control, nor should it be. I'm just saying I hear people complaining about it, and when people complain, you can be sure the Rats will be right there to exploit that misery to their advantage. They're like vultures in that sense.

143 posted on 05/14/2004 2:56:29 PM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: onyx; ambrose

saudis are useless


144 posted on 05/14/2004 2:57:18 PM PDT by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Yeah, his panel (a combo of libs and us)
all seemed to agree that OPEC is fixing
to open the spigets.

Not only THAT, but every darn one of 'em
praised the ecomomy and think Bush is in
for another 4 years.


145 posted on 05/14/2004 2:57:45 PM PDT by onyx (Rummy's job is winning the war, not micro-managing some damn prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: ambrose; AntiGuv

MONDAY POLLS WILL SHIFT SLIGHTLY BACK TO BUSHIE !
WHY .

SAME SEX MARRIAGES IN MASS !


146 posted on 05/14/2004 2:58:34 PM PDT by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin; Texas_Dawg

Well, if I ever decide that I think Kerry will win the election I'll be sure to let you know. LOL! And Texas Dawg too, he's got a standing bet offer as well.


147 posted on 05/14/2004 2:58:51 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

Arrogant works.


148 posted on 05/14/2004 2:58:52 PM PDT by onyx (Rummy's job is winning the war, not micro-managing some damn prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: KQQL

I have NO love for the Saudis.
NONE.


149 posted on 05/14/2004 2:59:33 PM PDT by onyx (Rummy's job is winning the war, not micro-managing some damn prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

More from Matthew Dowd

"In addition to approval numbers, pundits and Democrats will place an emphasis on re-elect numbers. Again it is important to have an understanding of historical precedent. Throughout 1995 President Clinton's re-elect hardly ever got above 40%. In a Battleground poll in April, 1995, Clinton's re-elect was 21%. The highest point Clinton's re-elect reached in 1995 was 43% in a poll due in December 1995 for Associated Press. In spite of the low re-elect number, President Clinton ending up winning re-election comfortably.


More recently, in 2002, every major statewide candidate with a re-elect of 45% or higher --- won! The average actual result on election day 2002 showed incumbents finishing 5 to 10 points above their re-elect numbers. It is no longer accurate to suggest that a candidate is vulnerable based solely on an incumbent having a re-elect number under 50%. "

read the whole thing http://www.gop.com/news/read.aspx?ID=3050

also to win Kerry needs Iraq to stay in the tank ... and the economy to go into the tank ... if both of those improve then he is done ...


150 posted on 05/14/2004 3:00:39 PM PDT by cohokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

FWIW, I will remind you in case you didn't notice that I spent all of last year and through about February of this year predicting a Bush landslide of 57%+. I'm as surprised as anyone that the polls are clearly pointing toward a Bush defeat at this juncture.

I have always had a weakness for historical patterns, BTW. It's very disconcerting to me when they clash like they're doing now.. =)


151 posted on 05/14/2004 3:01:28 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

You have no confidence, so hold your tongue about all this so called momentum swinging Kerrys way. The only one worse than Kerry was Dean and the RATS almost got stuck with him. Kerry is the most pathetic candiate I have seen in a long time. Don't forget we are using electronic voting this election, the RATS can't rig those machines.


152 posted on 05/14/2004 3:02:52 PM PDT by John Lenin (Never trust a traitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

You have the brainpower of a moth.

------

It takes one to know one


153 posted on 05/14/2004 3:02:56 PM PDT by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: cohokie
But, you keep bringing up numbers from the year before the year of the election (e.g., 1983, 1995, 2003). It is routine for the incumbent to post weak numbers in that year..
154 posted on 05/14/2004 3:04:05 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: KQQL

I study people for a living, you are somewhat suspect.


155 posted on 05/14/2004 3:04:35 PM PDT by John Lenin (Never trust a traitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

Oh, I have 100% confidence that the momentum is currently swinging Kerry's way.


156 posted on 05/14/2004 3:04:51 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Except Bush SR who was behind to a massachusets liberal until the republican convention ... or did you not read that ...


157 posted on 05/14/2004 3:05:08 PM PDT by cohokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: cohokie

to me approval numbers are more important then re-elect numbers.


158 posted on 05/14/2004 3:05:10 PM PDT by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
What a waste, they deserve Ketchupman!

I don't deserve a Ketchupman for my president. I plan to do all that I can to defeat Kerry the Ketchupman.

I urge all concerned Americans to do the same. Fight back! Get involved! Posting complaints on this board is not enough to ensure victory for our side

159 posted on 05/14/2004 3:05:13 PM PDT by Rooivalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: cohokie

Bush Sr was running for an open seat. Open-seat elections follow a whole different patterning than do incumbent reelection campaigns.


160 posted on 05/14/2004 3:06:01 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 321-324 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson