Skip to comments.
DISNEY FORBIDS DISTRIBUTION OF MICHAEL MOORE FILM THAT CRITICIZES BUSH
The Drudge Report ^
| 5.4.04
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 05/04/2004 7:38:07 PM PDT by mhking
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: Pukin Dog
WE SHOULD DEMAND THAT IT BE SHOWN FOR THE PARTISON TRIPE THAT IT IS.
Correct. However, we should actually buy tickets to see "michael moore hates America" as per Layout Guru's post.
61
posted on
05/04/2004 8:21:47 PM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: CzarNicky
Wow! That's full of visuals......Ever consider a film gig? From what I've seen, the work is easy and has very little in the way of standards.
62
posted on
05/04/2004 8:21:47 PM PDT
by
blackdog
(I feed the sheep the coyotes eat)
To: blackdog
"From what I've seen, the work is easy and has very little in the way of standards."
I am not sure there is a market for watching the death throws of foodstuffs. However, Michael Moore has proven there is an audience to watch the results of all that eating.
63
posted on
05/04/2004 8:28:33 PM PDT
by
CzarNicky
(The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
To: mhking
Splendid! I have further thoughts about M Moore, but they are not appropriate for a public forum.
64
posted on
05/04/2004 8:30:20 PM PDT
by
Annie03
(donate at www.terrisfight.org)
To: ikka
There would be massive boycotts of Disney properties, and they know it. I think the Walt Disney Company Board of Directors may have seen a near-final cut of Fahrenheit 9/11 and suddenly realized they could be a target for a MASSIVE consumer boycott of every Disney property--movies, theme parks, TV networks, publishing, and so on. That would definitely hurt the bottom line in a big way, and Michael Eisner and his cronies would be out in a New York minute. Hey, even in the liberal-leaning entertainment industry money talks.
I'm sure that the Disney folks saw the horrible PR fiasco with The Reagans miniseries from last year that scared the daylights out of CBS. I can guess in hindsight the biggest reason why CBS pulled the plug on showing the miniseries on CBS was the very fear they would suffer a boycott of the Super Bowl and the advertisers that bought ads during the Super Bowl broadcast--a potentially massive financial bloodbath, to say the least.
To: Psycho_Bunny
Because it mentions Michael Moore, I want you all to know about the book "Hollywood, Interrupted". It's a must read - and Free Republic has a few paragraphs in the www.wehatehollywood.com chapter. It's a disturbing and humorous critique of MM and his ilk. Makes me double happy we have decided to cancel directv and get the trash out of our house and away from our kids.
66
posted on
05/04/2004 8:34:51 PM PDT
by
Annie03
(donate at www.terrisfight.org)
To: CzarNicky
He'll console himself with an endless plate of ding dongs. Ding Dongs? I thought Moore would more have gone for a case of Ring Dings instead. Oh well, maybe it would be a case of Ding Dongs for breakfast and then a case of Ring Dings for lunch.
67
posted on
05/04/2004 8:45:11 PM PDT
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Any day you wake up is a good day.)
To: Colonel_Flagg
His most recent movie, "Bowling for Columbine," took in about $22 million in North America for United Artists.What's that, about three weeks worth of revenue for "Passion Of The Christ"?
That's less than the domestic revenues of the crappiest SNL-spinoff flick. This writer is an idiot.
To: Slings and Arrows
This writer is an idiot. This writer has an agenda. As the saying goes, though, "A difference that makes no difference is no difference."
69
posted on
05/04/2004 8:52:05 PM PDT
by
Colonel_Flagg
("You can observe a lot by watching." - Casey Stengel)
To: Petronski
70
posted on
05/04/2004 8:52:28 PM PDT
by
Sender
(I actually voted for inconsistancy before I voted against it.)
To: Colonel_Flagg
["Bowling for Columbine," took in about $22 million in North America for United Artists.] What's that, about three weeks worth of revenue for "Passion Of The Christ"?
Heck, PotC made $22 million or more in ONE DAY -- five different times (2/25, 2/27, 2/28, 2/29, 3/6).
To: Ichneumon
I knew someone, sooner or later, would pitch in with the correct figures. My thanks, and apologies for underestimating Mel :)
72
posted on
05/04/2004 8:57:45 PM PDT
by
Colonel_Flagg
("You can observe a lot by watching." - Casey Stengel)
To: jmstein7
Gotta love how anybody who doesn't toe the line and help fuel their propaganda machine is part of a secret GOP operation.
73
posted on
05/04/2004 8:59:43 PM PDT
by
Sofa King
(MY rights are not subject to YOUR approval http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/index.html)
To: ikka
Ummm, ding dongs are a kind of snack food.
To: Colonel_Flagg
Quite true.
To: ikka
There would be massive boycotts of Disney properties, and they know it. Roger that! The Disney execs understand who has the disposable income to spend on Disney products, and it is not the uneducated, ill-kept, tie-dyed lunatics that suckle upon Moore's Leninist nonsense. Looks like Disney may have finally figured out why Gore and Dean crashed and burned. Perhaps, the success of "The Passion" also provided a clue.
76
posted on
05/04/2004 9:03:02 PM PDT
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Any day you wake up is a good day.)
Isn't Sam Nunn on Disney's board of directors?
Eisner and Nunn will make it so that Disney distributes this movie.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I completely agree, with one exception: the shareholders are EXTREMELY pissed. This is a great market-oriented correction for the undue influence that the radical Left has had on the media for many years. Let Disney's collapse be the first of many to come.
78
posted on
05/04/2004 9:12:38 PM PDT
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Any day you wake up is a good day.)
To: mhking
It would be idiotic for Disney to associate themselves with a poisonous work like that, but did you notice? Moore's agent is blaming a Bush conspiracy.
79
posted on
05/04/2004 9:15:48 PM PDT
by
Starve The Beast
(I used to be disgusted, but now I try to be amused)
To: Ichneumon
NYT always looking for the bright side for the Left, ignoring the storm that approaches them.
80
posted on
05/04/2004 9:17:00 PM PDT
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Any day you wake up is a good day.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson