Skip to comments.
Tomorrow you will watch the destruction of an American Aircraft Carrier
Northeast Intelligence Network ^
| 03/29/04
| Source
Posted on 03/29/2004 7:56:56 PM PST by Rightone
Edited on 07/27/2004 2:55:55 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Arabic posting:
(Excerpt) Read more at homelandsecurityus.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqueda; antiamericanism; antiwesternism; blowemup; bombthreat; hangon; idiots; islam; islamofascism; islamofascists; jihad; marines; military; muslims; nationalsecurity; navy; nedebkanetwork; notachance; osama; religionofpeace; religionofpeacetm; sheesh; shieldsup; terror; terrorism; terroristbombing; terrorists; threats; usskittyhawk; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360, 361-366 next last
To: Jeff Head
an email from a "friend" is a lot easier on the blood pressure than a "visit from a friend".
(:-|)
341
posted on
03/30/2004 9:43:20 AM PST
by
Robert_Paulson2
(the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
To: Poohbah
The "S**tty Kitty" is haze-gray and underway at the moment.
And I was leary about saying her real name(BG).
And we called the JFK the can-opener.
Jack
342
posted on
03/30/2004 10:07:25 AM PST
by
btcusn
(Giving up the right to arms is a mistake a free people get to make only once.)
To: btcusn
When I was on the Coral Sea in 1989, we joked that the Russians would do more damage to the ship if they used rust remover instead of explosives in their missiles :o)
343
posted on
03/30/2004 10:24:30 AM PST
by
Poohbah
("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
To: null and void
And note the mother of all disclaimers at the end of the "prediction":
"But if the leading target remains then the attack was expected and it will be postponed."
Translation: This will happen, unless it doesn't happen, in which case you will know that it did not happen, even though it was planned to happen.
To: HitmanNY
I know that, but how does an aircraft get close enough for a collision with an aircraft carrier and not get shot down?It doesn't. Within two hundred miles it would be looked over, warned off and /or destroyed.
345
posted on
03/30/2004 10:34:21 AM PST
by
JimRed
(Fight election fraud! Volunteer as a local poll watcher, challenger or district official.)
To: johnfrink
It happened, but that was before it didn't happen.
346
posted on
03/30/2004 10:34:59 AM PST
by
js1138
To: TopDog2
"Maybe the carrier's own crew? A muslim infiltrator setting off a nuclear weapon??"
This could happen.
You know, it is a shame that it would take something like THIS to get through the thick skulls of some of the idiots in this country.
To: Muzzle_em
And, unless they claimed responsibility, no one would ever know...
348
posted on
03/30/2004 11:14:46 AM PST
by
TopDog2
(Happy that I still have my job...)
To: js1138
Nuclear land mine bought from North Korea ?
To: Rightone
"Arabic posting: "Tomorrow you will watch the destruction of an American Aircraft Carrier"Real world translation: Tomorrow this Arabic source will be revealed as yet another in the endless stream of radical-Islamic liars.
They don't build cars. They don't build planes. They don't write professional software, and they don't tell the truth.
350
posted on
03/30/2004 5:25:30 PM PST
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Long Cut; Fitzcarraldo
That's interesting. I hadn't known that about today's torpedoes.
However, the initial posting was with regard to a nuclear device and, I didn't think about it until after my posting: I wonder if just the initial impulse from the explosion ('way before the bubbles got there to upset bouyancy) would kill the hull - water being a good low-freq coupling mechanism and the acceleration/impulse being so high and well distributed?
351
posted on
03/30/2004 5:28:24 PM PST
by
solitas
(sometimes I lay awake at night looking up at the stars wondering where the heck did the ceiling go?)
To: Rightone
Ahh, it feels so good to know that stupidity still reigns in terrorism.
You should only gloat until after you achieve your objective.
352
posted on
03/30/2004 5:31:35 PM PST
by
Paul C. Jesup
(The Motto: 'Live and let live' is a suicidal belief...)
To: Teacher317
That's USS Enterprise (CVN-65), not Kitty Hawk.
To: AntiGuv; Poohbah
Well, if I were trying to get a jetliner close enough to an aircraft carrier to crash it then I would charter a plane, submit a flight plan that would take it over the carrier, follow the flight plan until I'm overhead or close to it, and then just dive into the carrier at maximum velocity. There's one problem with that scenario...
It's called Phalanx, a nasty anti-aircraft defense system installed on carriers that slings 3,000 rounds per minute of 20MM AA rounds at any aircraft that gets close.
Not that any aircraft would get that close to a carrier at sea to begin with. They are surrounded by cruisers, destroyers, and frigates armed with thousands of very accurate anti-aircraft missles, plus air power.
For terrorists to take out a carrier, it will have to be an inside job.
To: solitas; Long Cut
Test: Umbrella
Time: 23:15 8 June 1958 (GMT)
11:15 9 June 1958 (local)
Location: Enewetak lagoon
Test Height and Type: Underwater, -150 feet
Yield: 8 kt
Umbrella was a DOD sponsored weapons effects test for a medium depth underwater explosion. A Mk-7 bomb was used for the test (30 inches in diameter, 54 inches long, device weight 825 lb.) in a heavy pressure vessel (total weight 7000 lb.). Very similar to the Wahoo device. The device was detonated on the lagoon bottom NNE of Mut (Henry) Island. An underwater crater 3000 feet across and 20 feet deep was produced.
To: solitas; Long Cut
http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Tests/Wigwam.htmlOperation Wigwam
Test: Wigwam
Time: 21:00 14 May 1955 (GMT)
13:00 14 May 1955 (PDT)
Location: Pacific Ocean
Test Height and Type: Underwater, -2000 ft
Yield: 30 kt
Operation Wigwam consisted of a single nuclear detonation, (both the operation and test are known as Wigwam), conducted 400-500 miles SW of San Diego, California(about 29 Deg N, 126 Deg W). It was a deep water test (the ocean is 16,000 feet deep at that point) to investigate the vulnerability of submarines to deep nuclear weapons, and the feasibility of using depth bombs in combat (there was considerable concern about problems with surface contamination). The test device was a B-7 (Mk-90) Betty depth bomb that was suspended by a 2000 ft cable from a barge. The dry weight of the bomb was 8250 lb, 5700 lb when submerged.
6800 personnel on 30 ships participated in Wigwam. A 6 mile tow-line connected the fleet tug, Tawasa and the shot barge. Suspended from this line at varying ditances from the barge were three "Squaws" - sub-scale submarine-like pressure hulls equipped with instruments and cameras.
The ships conducting the test were 5 miles upwind from the barge, with the exception of the USS George Eastman (YAG-39) and USS Granville S. Hall (YAG-40). These two ships were equipped with heavy shielding and were stationed 5 miles downwind. Both ships were contaminated by the base surge, but due to the relatively dilute radioactivity (since the shot was at such a great depth) and the heavy shielding kept exposures within the Operation Wigwam dose limit of 3.9 rems. Nearly all personnel were issued film badges to measure radiation exposure, and some 10,000 badges were processed. Only 3 personnel were measured as having doses exceeding 0.5 rems.
To: Fitzcarraldo
Very interesting pic. Question: Do you know what caused the contrails out in front of the blast? Is that some form of shockwave?
To: Hatteras; Fitzcarraldo; Long Cut
H: I thought they launched contrail-generating missiles just before a blast to try to map their distortion/movement as a result of the shockwave. You usually see vertical lines like those in the classic desert explosions.
F: Wow. Awesome. Thanks for the link! I plan on checking out THAT site pretty thoroughly. :)
358
posted on
03/30/2004 7:34:41 PM PST
by
solitas
(sometimes I lay awake at night looking up at the stars wondering where the heck did the ceiling go?)
To: Hatteras; Fitzcarraldo; Long Cut
359
posted on
03/30/2004 7:42:24 PM PST
by
solitas
(sometimes I lay awake at night looking up at the stars wondering where the heck did the ceiling go?)
To: USNBandit
More than once I've actually seen FB change by > 30 degrees within minutes after pushing from Marshall. Seems like they will find the only thunderstorm within a hundred miles just to make up for the fact they're dragging a screw and can only make 15 kts of wind without the assistance of convective activity.
360
posted on
03/30/2004 7:51:22 PM PST
by
Glock17
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360, 361-366 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson