Skip to comments.
United Nations ponders Net's future
CNET News ^
| 03/26/2004
| Declan McCullagh
Posted on 03/26/2004 10:23:53 AM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
The title alone should send chills down your spine!
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
The United Nations wants a big piece of the Internet.Yep, now that Oil for Food's gone, they need a replacement source of bribe money.
3
posted on
03/26/2004 10:25:52 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(Howard, we hardly knew ye. Not that we're complaining, mind you...)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
If China wants more addresess, let them build their own internet.
4
posted on
03/26/2004 10:26:27 AM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Resolve to perform what you must; perform without fail that what you resolve.)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Ponder all they want, My puter is a UN free zone.
5
posted on
03/26/2004 10:28:15 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Aye, fight and you may die, run, and you'll live...at least a while)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
If I have a choice between spam and the UN getting involved in my internet, I would choose spam hands down.
And I HATE spam.
6
posted on
03/26/2004 10:28:25 AM PST
by
Skooz
(My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
The UN is looking at sources for a WORLD TAX, and thinks
the internet may be a way to accomplish that.
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
And, of course, they will want to impose a 'reasonable' fee structure...say, $0.01 per hit....
8
posted on
03/26/2004 10:28:52 AM PST
by
boris
(The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Internet standards are set and domain names are handled, a process currently dominated by the United States, Canada, Europe and Japan.
Couldn't be because, uhhhh....the United States, Canada, Europe and Japan developed it? So Koffie wants to give authority over to Tutuland, Fruitloopistan, and such similar nations.
Last year, the UN was wanting to tax the net.
Now, they want to steal it. After all, what contributions have the UN made in its development?
9
posted on
03/26/2004 10:29:37 AM PST
by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
ICANN started this mess with FR yesterday. After what FR and FReepers went through the past 24 hours, I don't want any international agency anywhere near us. The UN would no doubt limit free-speech to whatever is PC according to them. Everything else could be considered "spam" and subject to censorship.
10
posted on
03/26/2004 10:31:16 AM PST
by
CedarDave
(Election 2004: When Democrats attack, it's campaigning; when Republicans campaign, it's attacking.)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Here we go again. The U.N. is angry because the greedy old USA is denying hut dwellers in Mozambique Internet service.
11
posted on
03/26/2004 10:31:31 AM PST
by
ServesURight
(FReecerely Yours,)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
The United Nations hastily backed away from that proposal, however, after prominent members of the U.S. Congress slammed it as a "bureaucracy looking to get its greedy mitts on the Internet through new taxes." Yeah, don't let those greedy bureaucrats get their mitts on the internet through taxes - that's a job for Congress! Sheesh.
12
posted on
03/26/2004 10:31:31 AM PST
by
general_re
(The doors to Heaven and Hell are adjacent and identical... - Nikos Kazantzakis)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Does this say anything about the UNs priorities?
13
posted on
03/26/2004 10:31:43 AM PST
by
MJM59
To: TomGuy
Well...the UN does have a pretty good retirement program.
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
Dozens of delegates from developing nations echoed Annan's remarks throughout the rest of the day, arguing that their governments do not have a voice in the way the Internet is operated and that more money and investment from richer nations is the only way to end the so-called digital divide.And so we see the real agenda. It's just another way for the third world to plunder productive countries.
To: TomGuy
That's the way socialists ALWAYS operate.
They are parasites on the producers and developers of the world.
"You make it, we'll steal it."
sounds like a democrat.
16
posted on
03/26/2004 10:32:08 AM PST
by
MrB
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
criticizing the current system through which Internet standards are set and domain names are handled, a process currently dominated by the United States, Canada, Europe and Japan. Such structures "must be made accessible and responsive to the needs of all the world's people," Annan said. Right. Typing dot-UN is much more accessible and responsive to the world's people than .com or something. I'd have more respect for this idiot if he just came out and said "I want total control of the Internet".
17
posted on
03/26/2004 10:34:11 AM PST
by
CaptRon
(Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
To: Constitutionalist Conservative
The internet was invented and implemented with the tax revenues from U.S. taxpayers. DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). The U.N. and its member countries have no right to attempt to wrest our technology. Third world countries can participate when their economies grow sufficiently to justify the telecommunications infrastructure required. Until then, they need to focus on getting their act together. Prosperity is not a gift to be confiscated from successful nations and bestowed upon "poor" nations. The U.N. wants to play G_d and decide who gets to keep the fruits of their own labor. Screw them.
18
posted on
03/26/2004 10:36:59 AM PST
by
Myrddin
To: Myrddin
The U.N. wants to play G_d and decide who gets to keep the fruits of their own labor. Screw them. No wonder the democRats love the UN.
And screw them, too.
19
posted on
03/26/2004 10:38:37 AM PST
by
MrB
To: Skooz
I can delete spam. Now... if I could only delete the U.N.
20
posted on
03/26/2004 10:40:56 AM PST
by
TLI
(...........ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA..........)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson