Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's the heart versus the Bible
townhall.com ^ | 3/16/04 | Dennis Prager

Posted on 03/15/2004 9:57:21 PM PST by kattracks

I recently interviewed a 26-year-old Swedish student about her views on life. I asked her if she believed in God or in any religion.

"No, that's silly," she replied.

"Then how do you know what is right and wrong?" I asked.

"My heart tells me," she responded.

In a nutshell, that's the major reason for the great divide within America and between America and much of Europe. The majority of people use their heart -- stirred by their eyes -- to determine what is right and wrong. A minority uses their mind and/or the Bible to make that determination.

Pick almost any issue and these opposing ways of determining right and wrong become apparent.

Here are three examples.

Same-sex marriage: The heart favors it. You have to have a hard heart not to be moved when you see many of the loving same-sex couples who want to commit their lives to one another in marriage. The eye sees the couples; the heart is moved to redefine marriage.

Animal rights: The heart favors them. It is the rare person, for example, whose heart is not moved by the sight of an animal used for medical research. The eye sees the cuddly animal; the heart then equates animal and human life.

Abortion: How can you look at a sad 18-year-old who had unprotected sex and not be moved? What kind of heartless person is going to tell her she shouldn't have an abortion and should give birth?

The eyes and the heart form an extraordinarily powerful force. They can only be overcome when formulating policies by a mind and a value system that are stronger than the heart-eye duo.

With the decline of Judeo-Christian religions, the heart, shaped by what the eye sees (hence the power of television), has become the source of people's moral decisions.

This is a potentially fatal problem for our civilization. As beautiful as the heart might be, it is neither intellectually nor morally profound.

It is therefore frightening that hundreds of millions of people find no problem in acknowledging that their heart is the source of their values. Their heart knows better than thousands of years of accumulated wisdom; better than religions shaped by most of the finest thinkers of our civilization (and, to the believer, by God); and better than the book that has guided our society -- from the Founders of our uniquely successful society to the foes of slavery to the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and most of the leaders of the struggle for racial equality.

This elevation of one's heart is well beyond self-confidence -- it is self-deification.

One of the first things you learn in Judaism and Christianity is that the eyes and heart are usually terrible guides to the good and the holy. " . . . (D)o not follow after your own heart and your own eyes, which you are inclined to whore after" (Numbers 15:39); "the heart is deceitful above all things . . . " (Jeremiah 17:9).

Supporters of same-sex marriage see the loving gay couple, and therefore do not interest themselves in the effects of changing marriage and family on the children they do not see. And since they venerate their hearts, the biblical ideal of male-female love, marriage and family is of no significance to them.

Animal rights supporters' hearts are deeply moved by the animals they see experimented on, not by the millions of people they do not see who will suffer and die if we stop such experiments.
Likewise, the hearts of the people who support PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) are so moved by the plight of slaughtered chickens that the organization has a campaign titled "Holocaust on your plate," which equates our slaughtering of chickens with the Nazi slaughtering of Jews.

For 25 years I have been asking high school seniors across America if they would save their dog or a stranger first if both were drowning. The majority has nearly always voted against the person. Why? Because, they say with no self-doubt, they love their dog, not the stranger. An entire generation has been raised with no reference to any moral code above their heart's feelings. They do not know, and would not care if they did know, that the Bible teaches that human beings, not animals, are created in God's image.

So, too, those who cannot call any abortion immoral are moved by what they see -- the forlorn woman who wants an abortion, not by the human fetus they do not see. That is why abortion rights groups are so opposed to showing photos of fetuses that have been aborted -- such pictures might move the eye and the heart of viewers to judge the morality of many abortions differently.

It is undeniable that many people have used their minds and many have used the Bible in ways that have led to evil. And some of these people have been truly heartless. But not one of the great cruelties of the 20th century -- the Gulag, Auschwitz, Cambodia, North Korea, Mao's Cultural Revolution -- came from those who took their values from the Bible. And the great evil of the 21st century, though religion-based, doesn't come from the Bible either.

Meanwhile, the combination of mind, Judeo-Christian values and heart has produced over centuries the unique success known as America. Reliance on the heart will destroy this painstaking achievement in a generation.

©2004 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

Contact Dennis Prager | Read Prager's biography



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dennisprager; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-199 next last
To: NutCrackerBoy
and people who only follow part of the Bible should be ashamed. But nice try.
21 posted on 03/15/2004 11:11:30 PM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker
when the people following Jesus were hungry... he did NOT teach them to fish.

he fed five thousand of them and gave no fishing lessons. He did that more than once.

now later when the professional fishermen could not catch any after laboring all night, he told them how to fish... "caste ye on the other side, and ye will find" and the "nets breaked".

I am not sure about your analogy about the heart being wrong, and the bible advocating "teaching to fish" as a test or proof of character... at least not in the Jesus and the fish incidents...
22 posted on 03/15/2004 11:12:39 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2 (the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: breakem
What quote?
23 posted on 03/15/2004 11:13:22 PM PST by I got the rope (I'm coming for you DUmmy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: breakem
That's why Jesus came breakem, so we wouldn't have to live under the law, it's impossible.
24 posted on 03/15/2004 11:14:35 PM PST by I got the rope (I'm coming for you DUmmy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: breakem
People who only follow part of the Bible should be ashamed.

Is that really what you think? Because if it is not, then you haven't expressed anything at all. If it is, you have a gross misunderstanding of the seriousness with which scholars and people of faith have struggled with all manner of important moral questions.

25 posted on 03/15/2004 11:15:28 PM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Animal rights supporters' hearts are deeply moved by the animals they see experimented on, not by the millions of people they do not see who will suffer and die if we stop such experiments.

*chuckle* All animals are equal. But some animals are more equal than others. Cute furry cuddly animals have more rights than slimy slithery animals with chitinous exoskeletons.

26 posted on 03/15/2004 11:15:58 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1 (Lock-n-load!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NutCrackerBoy; breakem; I got the rope
This is the third time in the last day or two that dear old breakem (break what, I wonder?) has posted this little nugget, put together by Liz Smith of the New York Post. He may have posted it more often than that, I happen to have run into it 3X so far.

So let's all throw away our linen and wool clothes.

Anyone who has an interest in ethics and morality knows that moral teachings about sexual behavior are essential and cross cultural lines. Sincere people also know that ancient cultural practices aren't always applicable, and that throwing the baby out with the bath water leads to what we have now:

Professional and university elites trying to normalize child/adult sex. I am sure that many people feel in their hearts that it's right.
27 posted on 03/15/2004 11:19:01 PM PST by little jeremiah (...men of intemperate minds can not be free. Their passions forge their fetters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
and animals with delicious, corn fed, loins and shoulders... are more equal to the task of fitting themselves into my freezer and then my barbeque grill... then the scrawny ugly tasting ones.

their primary purpose in life is to be about 1.125 inches thick, and resting about six or seven minutes on each side....

pass the garlic please.
and an ice cold... adult beverage.
28 posted on 03/15/2004 11:19:13 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2 (the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: breakem
More to the point, she quotes the old testament (with the exception of a misinterpeted passage from Mark's gospel) laws which were fulfilled by Christ's coming.

Why are liberals always so obsessed with sex and sexual matters? Could this be the reason they hate God so? Do they fear being called sexually sinful? If so, why?
29 posted on 03/15/2004 11:19:42 PM PST by cartoonistx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
If you don't want to keep marriage true to Biblical values just say so and drop all the smoke.
30 posted on 03/15/2004 11:20:34 PM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: breakem
? and ?
31 posted on 03/15/2004 11:21:22 PM PST by little jeremiah (...men of intemperate minds can not be free. Their passions forge their fetters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
With the decline of Judeo-Christian religions, the heart, shaped by what the eye sees (hence the power of television), has become the source of people's moral decisions. This is a potentially fatal problem for our civilization. As beautiful as the heart might be, it is neither intellectually nor morally profound.

Give it up Dennis, You don't need Christianity to be moral and I would recommend you actually read the Bible before writing such a self righteous piece of tripe.

My Heart tells me Pedophillia, Genocide, Slavery and Human Sacrifice are bad things, Yet they are not only condoned in the Bible but in many cases encouraged by God (See The Book of Numbers Chapter 31 it covers them all.)

Abortion, I have no idea where they get this notion that the Bible is against Abortion, From what I've seen it seems to be all for it.

Hosea

9:14

Give them, O LORD: what wilt thou give? give them a miscarrying womb and dry breasts.

9:15

All their wickedness is in Gilgal: for there I hated them: for the wickedness of their doings I will drive them out of mine house, I will love them no more: all their princes are revolters.

9:16

Ephraim is smitten, their root is dried up, they shall bear no fruit: yea, though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the beloved fruit of their womb.

Hosea

13:16

Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.

And of course how to be happy according to the Bible

Psalms

137:9

Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.

32 posted on 03/15/2004 11:21:45 PM PST by qam1 (Tommy Thompson is a Fat-tubby, Fascist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cartoonistx
I don't know why liberals are obsessed with sex. But many here use the old testament to excoriate homosexuals. So I merely suggest they be consistent. Simple and to the point.
33 posted on 03/15/2004 11:21:49 PM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
I think he is saying that "he who is guilty of breaking one law is guilty of breaking all of them." So, if you strive to be under ANY of the law, the rest of the law, that you claim to be keeping, will rise up and condemn YOU in the end.


34 posted on 03/15/2004 11:25:21 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2 (the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
'It's the heart versus the Bible'

I'll take the Bible.
35 posted on 03/15/2004 11:27:43 PM PST by VaBthang4 (-He who watches over Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: breakem
Many here use the old testament to excoriate homosexuals. So I merely suggest they be consistent.

OK you've explained yourself. But you smeared this thread with crap from a different argument instead of responding thoughtfully to what was written.

36 posted on 03/15/2004 11:34:33 PM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: breakem
Then leave the Bible out and use logic. What is the purpose of having both male and female human beings. Why do they have sex organs? Using your vast powers of observation...what is the "form and function" of the male and female in our ecology?



37 posted on 03/15/2004 11:36:09 PM PST by I got the rope (I'm coming for you DUmmy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: breakem
I agree that the use of O.T. Hebraic code should not be the basis for condemnation of sexual sins today. After all, we should not be advocating the stoning of sinners (God's decree to the Jews) if Christ has redeemed in fact. But the unnatural and sinful state of homosexuality should not be celebrated as normal or encouraged by the granting of civil marriage either.
38 posted on 03/15/2004 11:39:55 PM PST by cartoonistx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
No. He is saying that Christians should follow the law and condemn homosexuals to death. BUT, since they were not condemned (according to him) in the New Testament, then we should accept this form of behavior.

39 posted on 03/15/2004 11:40:14 PM PST by I got the rope (I'm coming for you DUmmy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The heart or the Bible. No room for the mind in there someplace?
40 posted on 03/15/2004 11:41:05 PM PST by Salman (Mickey Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-199 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson