1 posted on
03/04/2004 11:44:30 AM PST by
diotima
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: ConservativeGadfly; abner; DoughtyOne; Nick Danger; Bob J; Seeking the truth; MinuteGal; diotima; ..
ping
2 posted on
03/04/2004 11:45:44 AM PST by
diotima
(Free the Miranda Memos!)
To: diotima
Bump!
3 posted on
03/04/2004 11:51:10 AM PST by
aculeus
To: diotima; BigSkyFreeper; OXENinFLA; onyx; mrs tiggywinkle
Oh my my
5 posted on
03/04/2004 11:52:49 AM PST by
Mo1
(Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
To: diotima
Need more info....
6 posted on
03/04/2004 11:53:21 AM PST by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: diotima
It's not so much a coverup, but it is a glaring example of how the Democrats tried to spin an inadvertantly delivered email for partisan advantage. It's apparent that both parties play political hardball.
8 posted on
03/04/2004 11:55:45 AM PST by
Dog Gone
To: diotima
The memo nonsense has gotten a good amount of press. But what hasnt gotten any press... THE CONTENT OF THE MEMOS!!
Imagine a republican memo from the judiciary opposing a nominee because "hes hispanic." Resignations would be demanded.
9 posted on
03/04/2004 11:55:45 AM PST by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: diotima
Handwritten:
"We should see how we can put a message on the bottom of every email that says the message is privileged and/or confidential. Ideas?" Has this person ever heard of a "signature file"? Geesh! All my business email has one attached.
12 posted on
03/04/2004 11:57:39 AM PST by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2003, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: diotima
As to the staffer's handwritten note: You can. Just create the message in the signature line.
13 posted on
03/04/2004 11:57:56 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: diotima
So Hatch is undercutting the White House?
Looks that way to me.
A la Craig Livingstone?
Manuel tried to warn them that he would go nuclear if they tried to quash the investigation.
I would vote for this man for President. He's my hero.
15 posted on
03/04/2004 12:00:02 PM PST by
mabelkitty
(If Kerry is so "electable", then why are Democrats afraid of Nader?)
To: diotima
Holy cow! Thanks for posting this.
To: Alamo-Girl
Do that voodoo you do so well....
20 posted on
03/04/2004 12:02:26 PM PST by
TomServo
(Stay together cheeks....)
To: diotima
The Republicans are right. We do need Constitutional judges on the bench to aid the war on terror. A dictatorial Socialist, i.e., activist judge, does not have the best interest of our republic in mind.
The Democrats, on the other hand, seem to feel a Constitutional approach to terrorism is a bad thing.
24 posted on
03/04/2004 12:03:02 PM PST by
concerned about politics
( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: diotima
bump
To: diotima; Dog
Fabulous dio.
Dog, I agree with your assessments 100%.
26 posted on
03/04/2004 12:05:38 PM PST by
onyx
(Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Jeffrey Dahmer, and Timothy McVeigh)
My favorite part is where the Democrats complain about the Republicans focusing in on HOW the email was obtained rather than what is in them. OH THE IRONY!!!!!!!!
28 posted on
03/04/2004 12:06:24 PM PST by
diotima
(Free the Miranda Memos!)
To: diotima
Fox News had scroll across bottom just now.
34 posted on
03/04/2004 12:09:49 PM PST by
mathluv
(Protect my grandchildren's future. Vote for Bush/Cheney '04.)
To: diotima
Something for the archives...
To: diotima
Democrat "No Hispanic Judges" Memo update ---
Full article here Committee leaders "want to give out as much information as possible, but we don't want to hamstring a possible prosecution," said Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy, the panel's ranking Democrat.
Committee chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, said he planned to release a version of the report with portions deleted but was willing to hear arguments for a more limited release.
"Whether any criminal laws were broken, the improper access was wrong and unjustifiable," he said earlier. He blamed "two misguided former Senate staffers" for the computer intrusion.
In addition to the thousands of documents that Democrats say were reached, Hatch said more than 100 of his computer files were "improperly accessed and transmitted outside the Senate."
Democrats also want to know if the White House or the Justice Department got copies of the memos and used them to coach Bush's nominees for confirmation hearings.
"If you take things that do not belong to you, that is wrong and there is no way to whitewash that," Leahy said before the closed hearing.
44 posted on
03/04/2004 12:14:00 PM PST by
concerned about politics
( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: diotima
SHAME ON HATCH!!!!
Once more, the biggest RINO in the west screws up, folds like a cheap deck of cards, and cowers in astonishment at a Democratic attack.
SHAME!!!!
50 posted on
03/04/2004 12:19:55 PM PST by
ZULU
(God Bless Senator Joe McCarthy!!!)
To: diotima
The relationship between Leahy's press secy and Al Kamen of Washington Post should be scrutinized real closely and noted for future reference, like Kamen being the pitbull for Leahy and other demoncRATS. Anyone living in the D.C. metropolitan area knows that the Washington Post, has been, is and always will be the mouthpiece for the demoncRAT party.
52 posted on
03/04/2004 12:21:40 PM PST by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson