Skip to comments.
Limbaugh Law - Hypocrisy in the defense of liberalism is no vice.
National Review ^
| February 26, 2004
| Mark R. Levin
Posted on 02/26/2004 6:36:00 AM PST by wcdukenfield
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: wcdukenfield
Apparently, to the Palm Beach Post, Rush Limbaugh and his views are more dangerous than terrorists who seek to sneak into our country and unleash mass destruction. The left simply can't be logically consistent. If they tried, their little heads would explode.
To: wcdukenfield
It seems to me that Mr. Krischer has broke the law and should be investigated himself. the libs cheer these unethical goings ons now but what will thier reaction be when the tables are turned on them? this country is turning as lawless as the old west. its like a nightmare .
3
posted on
02/26/2004 6:44:46 AM PST
by
suzyq5558
(The demodemons are ANGRY at the administration? so pray tell what is new?)
To: wcdukenfield
To: mountaineer
Terrorism is a crime. Doctor shopping is a crime. The illegal purchase of 30,000 schedule C narcotics is a crime.
The existence of greater crimes does not render a lesser crime not a crime.
5
posted on
02/26/2004 6:52:50 AM PST
by
tcuoohjohn
(Follow The Money)
To: wcdukenfield
It takes a hypocrite to know a hypocrite.
6
posted on
02/26/2004 6:58:04 AM PST
by
Protagoras
(When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
To: wcdukenfield
If this investigation is believed to be purely political, then a political response would be appropriate - Governor Bush could just pardon Rush for any drug offenses and put an end to the whole thing.
If this investigation is not purely political, then the investigation should go forward.
7
posted on
02/26/2004 7:01:43 AM PST
by
Scenic Sounds
(Sí, estamos libres sonreír otra vez - ahora y siempre.)
To: tcuoohjohn
Terrorism is a crime.
Agreed, but has this statement to do with illegal seizure of private medical records?
Doctor shopping is a crime.
Agreed, but why were records seized illegally? To get a subpoena, the Constitution mandates certain conditions:
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The illegal purchase of 30,000 schedule C narcotics is a crime.
Given that this act is, indeed, a crime and all of the time and money the prosecutor has expended to date, why have there been no charges against Limbaugh? The logical answer would be that it appears that the prosecutor is incompetent or that there are no real grounds for any charges.
If the prosecutor is incompetent, then he should be summarily dismissed by the press and his constituency. If there are no grounds for the charges, the prosecutor should be summarially dismissed by the press and his constituency and prosecuted, himself, for abuse of office.
8
posted on
02/26/2004 7:14:46 AM PST
by
Lucky Dog
To: tcuoohjohn
...Doctor shopping is a crime. The illegal purchase of 30,000 schedule C narcotics is a crime. Then there's no evidence Rush is guilty of any of your charges...otherwise he'd be charged, lord knows they've tried...
9
posted on
02/26/2004 7:16:16 AM PST
by
lewislynn
(The successful globalist employee will be the best educated, working for the lowest possible wage.)
To: tcuoohjohn
When did you find time to count all those pills?
10
posted on
02/26/2004 7:17:57 AM PST
by
basil
(Pro2A Mother's Day Rally 2004. Washington DC--BE THERE! www.2Asisters.org)
To: tcuoohjohn
"Terrorism is a crime. Doctor shopping is a crime. The illegal purchase of 30,000 schedule C narcotics is a crime."
Good point. And, I'm sure that Rush would have been charged by now if he had committed any of these crimes. He's obvious, then, that he's innocent.
To: wcdukenfield
I really like Mr. Levin. What a guy.
12
posted on
02/26/2004 7:19:12 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: tcuoohjohn
"Doctor shopping is a crime. The illegal purchase of 30,000 schedule C narcotics is a crime."
Maybe I missed it...but when was Rush charged with these "crimes?"
13
posted on
02/26/2004 7:23:43 AM PST
by
cwb
(Kerry may have saved one man but he abandoned thousands of others)
To: b4its2late; Recovering_Democrat; Alissa; Pan_Yans Wife; LADY J; mathluv; browardchad; cardinal4; ...
14
posted on
02/26/2004 7:27:38 AM PST
by
Born Conservative
(Some mornings it just doesn't seem worth it to gnaw through the leather straps.)
To: wcdukenfield
read later
To: wcdukenfield
In the end, by allowing legal consequences to be avoided by liberals when they err, and hypocritically insuring that conservatives cannot avoid them, they are creating behavior on the part of liberals which nonetheless has sometimes even worse, though non-legal, consequences.
Note the number of Hollywood stars who simply cannot lick their addictions, why? They are protected from consequences. The liberal cocoon creates destructive behavior, and in the end, is its own punishment.
To: mountaineer
The left simply can't be logically consistent. If they tried, their little heads would explode.Or it forces them to become conservative. It's happened to many good folks that I know!
17
posted on
02/26/2004 7:38:12 AM PST
by
FormerLib
("Homosexual marriage" is just another route to anarchy.)
To: tcuoohjohn
Maybe the government should seize your medical records, publish the drugs you've been prescribed -- and the various ailments you've had -- and all under the general claim of doctor-shopping. You're not supposed to seize someone's records in search of a crime. Have you ever heard of probable cause?
To: wcdukenfield
My only criticism of Rush is this. Why in the world did he choose to live in the most leftist county in Florida?
Is it possible that he likes being near these people rather than the rednecks in the panhandle?
19
posted on
02/26/2004 7:45:43 AM PST
by
yarddog
To: wcdukenfield
Mark Levin is a true ethical attorney, a shining light in the otherwise benighted lawyer industry. Plus he is amazingly funny, with a brilliant razor sharp wit, as he skewers the logical and moral flaws of hypocrites and other liberal vermin. He has a fabulous evening drive time radio show here in the New York area.
I also have great respect for two other voice in the wilderness honest attorneys: Ann Coulter and Rush's brother David.
20
posted on
02/26/2004 7:50:30 AM PST
by
FormerACLUmember
(Man rises to greatness if greatness is expected of him)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-124 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson