Skip to comments.
2004 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 2/23/2004
TradeSports.com ^
| Monday, February 23, 2004
| Momaw Nadon
Posted on 02/23/2004 1:35:06 PM PST by Momaw Nadon
State |
% Chance of Bush Winning |
Bush Electoral Votes |
Dem Electoral Votes |
Alabama |
95.0 |
9 |
0 |
Alaska |
94.0 |
3 |
0 |
Arizona |
75.0 |
10 |
0 |
Arkansas |
70.0 |
6 |
0 |
California |
18.0 |
0 |
55 |
Colorado |
80.0 |
9 |
0 |
Connecticut |
20.0 |
0 |
7 |
Delaware |
35.0 |
0 |
3 |
District of Columbia |
2.0 |
0 |
3 |
Florida |
68.0 |
27 |
0 |
Georgia |
90.0 |
15 |
0 |
Hawaii |
13.0 |
0 |
4 |
Idaho |
95.0 |
4 |
0 |
Illinois |
30.0 |
0 |
21 |
Indiana |
87.0 |
11 |
0 |
Iowa |
42.0 |
0 |
7 |
Kansas |
91.5 |
6 |
0 |
Kentucky |
88.0 |
8 |
0 |
Louisiana |
80.0 |
9 |
0 |
Maine |
39.0 |
0 |
4 |
Maryland |
17.5 |
0 |
10 |
Massachusetts |
4.0 |
0 |
12 |
Michigan |
47.0 |
0 |
17 |
Minnesota |
41.0 |
0 |
10 |
Mississippi |
94.0 |
6 |
0 |
Missouri |
65.0 |
11 |
0 |
Montana |
91.0 |
3 |
0 |
Nebraska |
95.0 |
5 |
0 |
Nevada |
65.0 |
5 |
0 |
New Hampshire |
58.0 |
4 |
0 |
New Jersey |
16.0 |
0 |
15 |
New Mexico |
58.0 |
5 |
0 |
New York |
15.0 |
0 |
31 |
North Carolina |
85.0 |
15 |
0 |
North Dakota |
95.0 |
3 |
0 |
Ohio |
65.0 |
20 |
0 |
Oklahoma |
93.0 |
7 |
0 |
Oregon |
39.0 |
0 |
7 |
Pennsylvania |
49.0 |
0 |
21 |
Rhode Island |
5.0 |
0 |
4 |
South Carolina |
87.0 |
8 |
0 |
South Dakota |
95.0 |
3 |
0 |
Tennessee |
85.0 |
11 |
0 |
Texas |
93.0 |
34 |
0 |
Utah |
95.0 |
5 |
0 |
Vermont |
7.0 |
0 |
3 |
Virginia |
85.0 |
13 |
0 |
Washington |
35.0 |
0 |
11 |
West Virginia |
47.0 |
0 |
5 |
Wisconsin |
49.0 |
0 |
10 |
Wyoming |
95.0 |
3 |
0 |
Totals |
|
278 |
260 |
TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Unclassified; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2004; bush; election; electionpresident; electoral; electoralvote; electoralvotes; georgebush; georgewbush; gwb2004; president; presidentbush; presidential; vote; votes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
I went to
TradeSports.com which is a futures market in which people bet on the outcomes of various things.
According to the current trading prices of the futures contracts, an estimate can be found of what traders are betting will be the outcome of 2004 Presidential Election.
If the traders are correct, President Bush would receive 278 Electoral Votes and the Democratic candidate would receive 260 Electoral Votes.
Opinions and commentary are welcome.
To: Momaw Nadon
2
posted on
02/23/2004 1:35:26 PM PST
by
Momaw Nadon
(Goals for 2004: Re-elect President Bush, over 60 Republicans in the Senate, and a Republican House.)
To: Momaw Nadon
I guess the reason why Bush has a 2% chance of winning DC is because you can't be positive how people on crack will vote.
3
posted on
02/23/2004 1:37:52 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Momaw Nadon
Do this calculation.
For each state, take the EV times the percentage chance of winning. Example. Bush has 85% chance to win State X with 10 EV. Bush gets 8.5, Kerry gets 1.5.
I realize each state (except ME/NE) is winner-take-all. This method gives an overall likely EV count that will fluctuate a little, since Bush will win some states projected <50% and will lose some state projected >50%.
4
posted on
02/23/2004 1:40:21 PM PST
by
PetroniDE
(Kitty Is My Master - I Do What She Says)
To: Dog Gone
Don't forget the lead they have found in the drinking water.
5
posted on
02/23/2004 1:40:46 PM PST
by
bmwcyle
(<a href="http://www.johnkerry.com/" target="_blank">miserable failure)
To: Dales; Neets
Ping!
6
posted on
02/23/2004 1:41:43 PM PST
by
Momaw Nadon
(Goals for 2004: Re-elect President Bush, over 60 Republicans in the Senate, and a Republican House.)
To: Dog Gone
If Bush, or any Republican, ever won DC, I would fully expect to see 4 men on horses in the sky.
To: Momaw Nadon
Bush has gone from 355 ECVs to 278 in a month. Hope he's hit the bottom...
8
posted on
02/23/2004 1:43:29 PM PST
by
11th_VA
(Don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining ...)
To: Momaw Nadon
It's turned into a squeaker since the Jan 21 projections.
Florida at 68% with 27 EV is a nail biter again.
9
posted on
02/23/2004 1:43:55 PM PST
by
NautiNurse
(Missing Iraqi botulinum toxin? Look at John Kerry's face)
To: Momaw Nadon
The only changes from 2000 are New Mexico going for Bush and West Virginia going for the Dem (5 votes each way). Bush's electoral vote total is higher than in 2000 due to the shift of Congressional seats toward the Sun Belt, reflected in the last census.
Lowest probability states for Bush currently in his column:
New Hampshire (4 electoral votes) and New Mexico (5), both at 58%. If he lost both and the rest went the same as predicted, it's a 269-269 tie (though states' House delegations vote based on one vote per delegation and Bush would win that).
After that we have Missouri (11) 65%, Nevada (4) 65%, Ohio (20) 65%, Florida (27) 68%.
Methinks the Dems make a huge push in Missouri and Ohio, either one of those could decide the race if it's close.
To: Momaw Nadon
Changes from last week's forecast:
Bush loses Michigan (-17 electoral votes)
Bush loses Pennsylvania (-21 electoral votes)
Bush loses West Virginia (-5 electoral votes)
To: Momaw Nadon
Assume he loses NH as well, and squeeks by with 274 votes, but with two FEWER states than he won in 2000 (WV & NH). Man, the DU would go crazy, riots in the streets, I think that's gonna happen if Bush wins anyway...
12
posted on
02/23/2004 1:48:12 PM PST
by
11th_VA
(Don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining ...)
To: PetroniDE
Another, quicker way to see that Bush's electoral votes are holding up nicely (at this v early stage) is the fact that in 6 states totalling 70 electoral votes Bush needs a swing of less than 10% to win,whereas he has such a slender lead in only two states (NH and New Mexico) totalling 8 electoral votes.
ScaniaBoy
To: Momaw Nadon
It looks like all but 1 of the close (within about 5 points) percentages are blue states. Not a bad sign.
Honestly, I think Kerry has pretty much topped out. To me, he is less electable than Gore and not even Gore could manage an Electoral College majority.
To: Dog Gone
No, the reason Bush has a 2% chance of winning DC is because you can't be positive how people on crack participating in a futures market simulation will bet.
To: PetroniDE
Do this calculation. For each state, take the EV times the percentage chance of winning. This method gives an overall likely EV count
According to this calculation, I get 55.42% X 538 = 298.14 Bush Electoral Votes.
16
posted on
02/23/2004 1:51:18 PM PST
by
Momaw Nadon
(Goals for 2004: Re-elect President Bush, over 60 Republicans in the Senate, and a Republican House.)
To: So Cal Rocket
Then it's probably more accurate since I do not see Bush winning Michigan or Pennsylvania at this point anyway. If we had even a shot at winning either one of them, I'd say Pennsylvania but it will probably go Dem.
WV, I call it a toss-up.
To: Momaw Nadon
Bush loses Ohio and/or Missouri:
IF not on the issue on Jobs, Jobs, Jobs,
then, probably,
on the issues of God, guns, gays and abortion (ie. IF Dubya does not move right enough on these).
18
posted on
02/23/2004 1:51:24 PM PST
by
MagnusMaximus1
(True conservatives: Neo-conned into a war that may lead to Dubya's loss)
To: Momaw Nadon
This race is going to go down to the wire, as I expected all along, and that will be because of economic issues. Bush is about out of time on that. And sending Mankiw and Snow out to shoot their mouths off and shoot themselves in the foot won't help things. The memory of 9/11 will be long gone from the (somewhat vacuous) minds of most of the electorate. Those who were predicting a blowout for Bush only a few weeks ago might as well have been on crack. Look for OH or MO to be the FL of this election. And keep an eye on vote fraud elsewhere. The Rats will do ANYTHING to beat Bush this time around.
19
posted on
02/23/2004 1:54:47 PM PST
by
chimera
To: MagnusMaximus1
Ohio and Missouri will indeed be the battleground states.
This means the Dems will put together a Kerry/Gephardt ticket.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson