Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2004 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 2/23/2004
TradeSports.com ^ | Monday, February 23, 2004 | Momaw Nadon

Posted on 02/23/2004 1:35:06 PM PST by Momaw Nadon

State % Chance of Bush Winning Bush Electoral Votes Dem Electoral Votes
Alabama 95.0 9 0
Alaska 94.0 3 0
Arizona 75.0 10 0
Arkansas 70.0 6 0
California 18.0 0 55
Colorado 80.0 9 0
Connecticut 20.0 0 7
Delaware 35.0 0 3
District of Columbia 2.0 0 3
Florida 68.0 27 0
Georgia 90.0 15 0
Hawaii 13.0 0 4
Idaho 95.0 4 0
Illinois 30.0 0 21
Indiana 87.0 11 0
Iowa 42.0 0 7
Kansas 91.5 6 0
Kentucky 88.0 8 0
Louisiana 80.0 9 0
Maine 39.0 0 4
Maryland 17.5 0 10
Massachusetts 4.0 0 12
Michigan 47.0 0 17
Minnesota 41.0 0 10
Mississippi 94.0 6 0
Missouri 65.0 11 0
Montana 91.0 3 0
Nebraska 95.0 5 0
Nevada 65.0 5 0
New Hampshire 58.0 4 0
New Jersey 16.0 0 15
New Mexico 58.0 5 0
New York 15.0 0 31
North Carolina 85.0 15 0
North Dakota 95.0 3 0
Ohio 65.0 20 0
Oklahoma 93.0 7 0
Oregon 39.0 0 7
Pennsylvania 49.0 0 21
Rhode Island 5.0 0 4
South Carolina 87.0 8 0
South Dakota 95.0 3 0
Tennessee 85.0 11 0
Texas 93.0 34 0
Utah 95.0 5 0
Vermont 7.0 0 3
Virginia 85.0 13 0
Washington 35.0 0 11
West Virginia 47.0 0 5
Wisconsin 49.0 0 10
Wyoming 95.0 3 0
Totals   278 260


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Unclassified; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2004; bush; election; electionpresident; electoral; electoralvote; electoralvotes; georgebush; georgewbush; gwb2004; president; presidentbush; presidential; vote; votes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
I went to TradeSports.com which is a futures market in which people bet on the outcomes of various things.

According to the current trading prices of the futures contracts, an estimate can be found of what traders are betting will be the outcome of 2004 Presidential Election.

If the traders are correct, President Bush would receive 278 Electoral Votes and the Democratic candidate would receive 260 Electoral Votes.

Opinions and commentary are welcome.

1 posted on 02/23/2004 1:35:07 PM PST by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Previous projections:

2004 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 2/16/2004
2004 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 2/9/2004
2004 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 2/2/2004
2004 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 1/26/2004
2004 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 1/21/2004

2 posted on 02/23/2004 1:35:26 PM PST by Momaw Nadon (Goals for 2004: Re-elect President Bush, over 60 Republicans in the Senate, and a Republican House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
I guess the reason why Bush has a 2% chance of winning DC is because you can't be positive how people on crack will vote.
3 posted on 02/23/2004 1:37:52 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Do this calculation.

For each state, take the EV times the percentage chance of winning. Example. Bush has 85% chance to win State X with 10 EV. Bush gets 8.5, Kerry gets 1.5.

I realize each state (except ME/NE) is winner-take-all. This method gives an overall likely EV count that will fluctuate a little, since Bush will win some states projected <50% and will lose some state projected >50%.

4 posted on 02/23/2004 1:40:21 PM PST by PetroniDE (Kitty Is My Master - I Do What She Says)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Don't forget the lead they have found in the drinking water.
5 posted on 02/23/2004 1:40:46 PM PST by bmwcyle (<a href="http://www.johnkerry.com/" target="_blank">miserable failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dales; Neets
Ping!
6 posted on 02/23/2004 1:41:43 PM PST by Momaw Nadon (Goals for 2004: Re-elect President Bush, over 60 Republicans in the Senate, and a Republican House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
If Bush, or any Republican, ever won DC, I would fully expect to see 4 men on horses in the sky.
7 posted on 02/23/2004 1:43:19 PM PST by GiveEmDubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Bush has gone from 355 ECVs to 278 in a month. Hope he's hit the bottom...
8 posted on 02/23/2004 1:43:29 PM PST by 11th_VA (Don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
It's turned into a squeaker since the Jan 21 projections.

Florida at 68% with 27 EV is a nail biter again.

9 posted on 02/23/2004 1:43:55 PM PST by NautiNurse (Missing Iraqi botulinum toxin? Look at John Kerry's face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
The only changes from 2000 are New Mexico going for Bush and West Virginia going for the Dem (5 votes each way). Bush's electoral vote total is higher than in 2000 due to the shift of Congressional seats toward the Sun Belt, reflected in the last census.

Lowest probability states for Bush currently in his column:

New Hampshire (4 electoral votes) and New Mexico (5), both at 58%. If he lost both and the rest went the same as predicted, it's a 269-269 tie (though states' House delegations vote based on one vote per delegation and Bush would win that).

After that we have Missouri (11) 65%, Nevada (4) 65%, Ohio (20) 65%, Florida (27) 68%.

Methinks the Dems make a huge push in Missouri and Ohio, either one of those could decide the race if it's close.
10 posted on 02/23/2004 1:46:02 PM PST by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Changes from last week's forecast:

Bush loses Michigan (-17 electoral votes)
Bush loses Pennsylvania (-21 electoral votes)
Bush loses West Virginia (-5 electoral votes)

11 posted on 02/23/2004 1:47:49 PM PST by So Cal Rocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Assume he loses NH as well, and squeeks by with 274 votes, but with two FEWER states than he won in 2000 (WV & NH). Man, the DU would go crazy, riots in the streets, I think that's gonna happen if Bush wins anyway...
12 posted on 02/23/2004 1:48:12 PM PST by 11th_VA (Don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PetroniDE
Another, quicker way to see that Bush's electoral votes are holding up nicely (at this v early stage) is the fact that in 6 states totalling 70 electoral votes Bush needs a swing of less than 10% to win,whereas he has such a slender lead in only two states (NH and New Mexico) totalling 8 electoral votes.

ScaniaBoy
13 posted on 02/23/2004 1:48:23 PM PST by ScaniaBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
It looks like all but 1 of the close (within about 5 points) percentages are blue states. Not a bad sign.

Honestly, I think Kerry has pretty much topped out. To me, he is less electable than Gore and not even Gore could manage an Electoral College majority.
14 posted on 02/23/2004 1:49:28 PM PST by GiveEmDubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
No, the reason Bush has a 2% chance of winning DC is because you can't be positive how people on crack participating in a futures market simulation will bet.
15 posted on 02/23/2004 1:51:00 PM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PetroniDE
Do this calculation. For each state, take the EV times the percentage chance of winning.

This method gives an overall likely EV count


According to this calculation, I get 55.42% X 538 = 298.14 Bush Electoral Votes.

16 posted on 02/23/2004 1:51:18 PM PST by Momaw Nadon (Goals for 2004: Re-elect President Bush, over 60 Republicans in the Senate, and a Republican House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
Then it's probably more accurate since I do not see Bush winning Michigan or Pennsylvania at this point anyway. If we had even a shot at winning either one of them, I'd say Pennsylvania but it will probably go Dem.

WV, I call it a toss-up.
17 posted on 02/23/2004 1:51:19 PM PST by GiveEmDubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Bush loses Ohio and/or Missouri:
IF not on the issue on Jobs, Jobs, Jobs,
then, probably,
on the issues of God, guns, gays and abortion (ie. IF Dubya does not move right enough on these).
18 posted on 02/23/2004 1:51:24 PM PST by MagnusMaximus1 (True conservatives: Neo-conned into a war that may lead to Dubya's loss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
This race is going to go down to the wire, as I expected all along, and that will be because of economic issues. Bush is about out of time on that. And sending Mankiw and Snow out to shoot their mouths off and shoot themselves in the foot won't help things. The memory of 9/11 will be long gone from the (somewhat vacuous) minds of most of the electorate. Those who were predicting a blowout for Bush only a few weeks ago might as well have been on crack. Look for OH or MO to be the FL of this election. And keep an eye on vote fraud elsewhere. The Rats will do ANYTHING to beat Bush this time around.
19 posted on 02/23/2004 1:54:47 PM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MagnusMaximus1
Ohio and Missouri will indeed be the battleground states.

This means the Dems will put together a Kerry/Gephardt ticket.

20 posted on 02/23/2004 2:00:18 PM PST by So Cal Rocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson