Media chiefs back Kerry campaign

The Guardian (UK) ^ | Feb 10, 2004 | Owen Gibson

[M. Thatcher]

Fresh from his latest win in Maine, the favourite to challenge George Bush for the US presidency has secured the financial support of some of the most powerful media moguls in the world.

As John Kerry's campaign to secure the Democrat nomination - and with it a crack at the White House - continues to gather pace, it has emerged that it is being bankrolled by key executives from News Corporation, MTV-owner Viacom and Sony.

The victory in Maine, Mr Kerry's 10th out of the 12 primaries in the opening weeks of the Democrat selection campaign, confirmed his position as overwhelming favourite to take on President Bush in November's presidential election.

Unsurprisingly, the donation from News Corp's boardroom came not from chairman Rupert Murdoch, a committed Republican, but from the company's chief operating officer, Peter Chernin.

Mr Chernin, one of Mr Murdoch's most trusted lieutenants, is among several media chiefs who have pledged to raise between $50,000 and $100,000 to support the Vietnam war veteran's campaign for the White House.

Others who have pledged to raise more than $50,000 include the Viacom chief executive, Sumner Redstone, and Sony chairman Howard Stringer, whose name has recently been linked with the vacant chairmanships at ITV and the BBC.

Most of the money raised from these contributors will have to be raised through business associates, relatives and friends as individuals can only give a total of $4,000 each to presidential candidates - $2,000 during the primaries and another $2,000 during a general election.

US political commentators have speculated that Mr Kerry has enjoyed the support of the media community in an effort to head off the challenge of Howard Dean, who has fallen back in the race despite being the frontrunner before the primaries began. Mr Dean made statements last year about wanting to break up media conglomerates.

New figures compiled by the Federal Election Commission, correct up to the end of December 2003, show that Mr Chernin and the president of the Motion Picture Association of America, Jack Valenti, both gave the maximum $2,000 to Mr Kerry's campaign.

Mr Redstone gave $1,000 to Mr Kerry, $3,000 to the re-election bid of the senate minority leader, Tom Daschle, and $5,000 to the Democratic senatorial campaign committee. Mel Karmazin, the chief operating officer at Viacom, also gave $4,000 to Mr Daschle.

Mr Murdoch, meanwhile, contributed $2,000 to the re-election as senator of Republican John McCain, who is chairman of the influential senate commerce committee, which regulates the media.

Contributors to president George W Bush's re-election campaign included the Time Warner chief executive, Richard Parsons, who handed over $2,000, and the Clear Channel chief executive, Lowry Mays.

Other noteworthy media executives who contributed to party funds include the cable mogul and Liberty Media chief executive, John Malone, who gave $2,000 to the Republican National Committee last year, and Disney's under-fire chief executive Michael Eisner, who gave $5,000 to the National Republican Congressional Committee.

MediaGuardian.co.uk © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004

[ABG(anybody but Gore)]

Disney's under-fire chief executive Michael Eisner, who gave $5,000 to the National Republican Congressional Committee.

Aside from the fact that I'm shocked Eisner would contribute to the GOP, they should return the contribution on general principle.

[Piquaboy]

Gee! What a big surprise. Suddenly the are all Vietnam war fans also.

[anniegetyourgun]

Figgers.

[jmcclain19]

Not surprised that Clear Channel or Time Warner heads have donated to President Bush. Look at the quality of programming of the two.

The Cartoon Network against MTV.

[WinOne4TheGipper]

Fox ping.

[nutmeg]

Thanks for the ping... I'll ping my FoxFan list in a few minutes.

[nutmeg]

As John Kerry's campaign to secure the Democrat nomination - and with it a crack at the White House - continues to gather pace, it has emerged that it is being bankrolled by key executives from News Corporation, MTV-owner Viacom and Sony...

...Unsurprisingly, the donation from News Corp's boardroom came not from chairman Rupert Murdoch, a committed Republican, but from the company's chief operating officer, Peter Chernin.

Mr Chernin, one of Mr Murdoch's most trusted lieutenants, is among several media chiefs who have pledged to raise between $50,000 and $100,000 to support the Vietnam war veteran's campaign for the White House.

FoxFan ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[lainde]

bttt

[areafiftyone]

Looks like Murdoch supported Gore in 2000 too.

[cwb]

Corporations are pragmatists. Unlike liberal special interests who generally give overwhelmingly to Democrats, corporate America still must live and operate under the prospects of one party or the other. While Republicans may reap a majority of these contributions, Democrats receive their fair share as many businesses still spread their wealth in effort to insulate/protect themselves from adverse policy and policy makers. Some people call it buying influence...others call it paying to be left alone.

Compare this to the narrow-mindedness of liberal groups (Unions, lawyers, etc) who put all their eggs in one Democratic basket...and then moan when they don't get the things they want when their party losses. It's the same narrow-mindedness you see within the black community...were instead of supporting and trying to influence both parties, they bet on one horse and bitch when their horse doesn't pay off. It's the sad reality of politics...but unless you diversify, there's a good chance you're going to lose. Just ask those institutions (Micorsoft, Tobacco, etc) that didn't pay enough for protection:)

[Salvation]

**the donation from News Corp's boardroom came not from chairman Rupert Murdoch, a committed Republican, but from the company's chief operating officer, Peter Chernin.**

Does Murdoch need to get a new CEO?

Is this the reason Fox has been going downhill?