| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 02/24/2004 11:47:52 AM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
Thread 4. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1084291/posts |
Posted on 02/05/2004 8:31:17 PM PST by Mossad1967
Edited on 02/09/2004 3:20:18 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
SANAA, Yemen, Jan. 24 (UPI) -- A purported statement by al-Qaida in Yemen warned Saturday of a "major strike" soon in the United States.
The statement, distributed by the Yemeni Tagamoo Party for Reforms, said: "A major strike, a big event will take place in America soon," reminiscent of the Sept. 11 attacks.
Nuclear fallout for Pakistan
By Pervez Hoodbhoy
Many in Pakistan have rallied to defend the country's bomb-makers (needlessly and incorrectly called "scientists" although they are technologists and have not created any new science). This is even after abundant proof that they have freely spread nuclear weapons secrets and equipment around the globe.
Some vociferously argue that, by not having signed the NPT, the bomb-makers are blameless since they broke no law or treaty by sharing nuclear secrets with other parties. But this legalistic argument is weak, unconvincing, and insufficient to prevent serious damage to Pakistan.
For over 15 years Pakistan had repeatedly assured the world that it was a responsible nuclear power whose nuclear weapons were solely aimed at deterring nuclear India.
It rejected accusations of having proliferated nuclear weapon technologies. These angry denials coincided, as we now know, with the surreptitious activities of our bomb-makers.
In other words, we were all taken for a ride. The enormous credibility gap this creates will surely be a handicap for all leaders of Pakistan, present and future.
The transfers to North Korea are relatively prosaic. Having developed the bomb, Pakistan needed missiles to deliver them. North Korea was willing to supply them, for a price. Like the URENCO centrifuges, all Kahuta had to do was put them together and stick a star and crescent on them.
But the real problem is considerably more serious. For years, Pakistan's powerful Islamic parties have openly embraced the bomb, chanted slogans in praise, and even paraded cardboard replicas through the streets.
For them, it is more than just a means to defend Pakistan's national frontiers - it belongs to the entire Muslim ummah. In doing so, they borrowed from the prison notes of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the first person to have written of the need for an Islamic Bomb.
The notion of sharing the 'bomb' for ideological reasons has caused more alarm than the profit motive, as has been ascribed to explain the activities of Dr. A.Q. Khan and his cohorts.
From the inception of the bomb programme, the Pakistani establishment sought to turn its nuclear successes into larger gains. For one, it wanted - and gained - the support of hundreds of millions of the Muslims the world over by claiming to provide a Muslim "success story" (that this involved replicating a sixty-year-old technology for mass destruction is a sad commentary on the state of the Muslim world).
For another, it enabled Pakistan to enjoy considerable financial and political benefits from oil-rich Arab countries. Among others, Libya reportedly bankrolled Pakistan and may even have supplied raw uranium.
After Pakistan successfully tested in May 1998, the Saudi government gave an unannounced gift of four billion dollars worth of oil spread over a period of five years to help Pakistan tide over difficulties caused by international sanctions.
Whatever utility such a strategy may have had in previous years, to promote an Islamic bomb in the post-9/11 world is both military folly and a political suicide. Unfortunately, some pan-Islamists and those who work in the country's nuclear establishment seem incapable of realizing this.
While it is inconceivable that any Muslim country will request Pakistan for nuclear weapons, there is little doubt that some non-state actors are more enthusiastic.
One recalls that two years ago highly placed members of the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission wanted to play their role in the jihad against America. In a fit of Islamic solidarity they went to Afghanistan and met Osama bin Laden and the Taliban. It is difficult to believe that they were the only ones so inclined.
For the moment the efforts of some Pakistani bomb-makers to peddle nuclear secrets appear to have been stymied. But merely by having tried to do so, and invoking solidarity with the ummah, they have put Pakistan in mortal danger.
This could have horrific consequences. Imagine, for example, the situation arising from an atomic explosion in some American city. A superpower, blinded with grief and rage, would be sure to exact a terrible price.
Mere suspicion might form the basis of action. It is quite possible that the Americans would bomb Pakistan first - perhaps with nuclear weapons - and look later for justifications.
Iraq stands as a reminder of America's genocidal fury and the desire to avenge 9/11. The subsequent non-discovery of weapons of mass destruction has been shrugged off by George Bush and his neo-con cabal.
The fallout from the escapades of Dr. Khan and others is certain to affect the level of secrecy and opacity that Pakistan's nuclear establishment has tried so hard to maintain.
Editorials and articles published in influential US newspapers suggest that intense pressure will surely be applied by the US government. The demands would likely include on-site inspection and monitoring of Pakistani fissile material production at the enrichment facility at Kahuta and elsewhere, the plutonium production reactor at Khushab, and all centres where nuclear materials are processed and stored.
Pakistan is certain to strongly resist this demand and, for the moment, may even partially succeed. However, as a compromise between allowing some transparency and avoiding the accusation of having sold out to the Americans, it is possible that the government may secretly allow the installation of cameras and various sensing devices in nuclear installations and an audit of fissile materials.
In the longer term one can expect more direct pressures. This could include economic sanctions - or even military action - if the political situation changes dramatically.
This could happen if Pakistan's cooperation with the US in fighting Al Qaeda falters, or if an Islamic group is successful in eliminating General Musharraf and his replacement is considered to be an Islamic radical. One must then expect a determined effort to put Pakistan's nuclear weapons under international (read: United States) control.
It is time to give up the fantasy of a Bomb for the ummah, and time to rein in Pakistan's bomb-makers. Their illegitimate nuclear commerce has created a nightmare for the reputation, safety, and security of their own country.
It is difficult to know what Dr. Khan meant when he said he had acted out of "good faith". One wonders what kind of faith allows for putting instruments of mass murder on sale in the open market.
The writer is professor of physics at Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad.
Once the pursued man's car wrecked and stopped the pursuer stepped out of his car with a machine gun and shot up the car and the man being pursued. It was unbelievable. It sounded as if we were in Iraq, the noise and the vibration from the gun. A young boy about age 10 that lived in the house where the car wrecked was outside and stated that a bullet went through one of their front windows and out one of their back windows.
A mail person (female) was in the process of delivering the mail. She is now a witness.
As I stated at first I don't know where the confrontation started but there are two crime scenes roped off. After further investigation (being noisy) I found out that there were a couple of other mail trucks in the area, one of which got shot up during the chase. The first crime scene had # placing counting over 40 bullet casings. The second crime scene (where the pursuee was shot) was not numbered but I saw multiple casings.
The female mail person was so visibly shaken. I think she must have smoked 10 cigarettes in 30 minutes.
I am going to try to catch my local news tonight. There were a couple of tv news crews at the scene.
Needless to say I am glad to be back home.
I don't know if it was because of the size and type of gun that was used but there was a couple of law enforcement officers there that had jerseys on that had bomb squad logo on the backside.
My bet is that khan's actual motivation was fueled by old fashioned greed and his conviction that Pakistan shouldn't represent the only muslim nation with nuke capability.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridhwan Al-Saqqaf
The US-donated gunboats will be used to monitor Yemen’s coasts and stop any infiltrations. (YT photo)
Yemeni Coast Guard Authority in Aden on Monday received seven American gunboats offered to Yemen for security purposes off the Yemeni coast and the Gulf of Aden. Forces of the Yemeni Coast Guard have conducted a sea survey of the areas where the boats are to be deployed in southern areas of the Red Sea, Miyoun Island, the Bab el Mandab Strait and the Gulf of Aden to secure those coasts and to watch shipping in the Bab el Mandab Strait as part of the security plan for fighting terror.
Yemen Times has learned that the United States will deliver to Yemen a second batch of interceptor gunboats under a plan to supply the Yemeni Coast Guard with such boats to protect its ports and territorial waters.
Military training operations are scheduled for the next few days, focusing on the use of the Coast Guard gunboats against possible acts of terrorism. The Coast Guard Authority trained a number of officers and soldiers in the United States in late 2003.
The Commander of the American forces in the Horn of Africa last month attended the graduation ceremony of a group of Coast Guard personnel and witnessed anti-terrorism military maneuvers by Yemeni Special Forces and some American experts, in addition to forces of the Yemeni Coast Guard.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yemen Times Staff
RIYADH, Feb 17 (Reuters) - The leaders of Saudi Arabia and Yemen met on Tuesday in a bid to resolve tensions over a barrier being built by Saudi Arabia on their common border aimed at curbing a flow of weapons fuelling militant violence.
More than 50 people were killed in suicide bombings of residential compounds in Riyadh last year blamed on Saudi-born Osama bin Laden’s militant Islamist al Qaeda network. Much of the militant arsenal is believed to have been spirited across the Yemeni border.
The official Saudi Press Agency said Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh met King Fahd and de facto ruler Crown Prince Abdullah in Riyadh for discussions. It gave no details but sources close to the talks said they focused on efforts to overcome tension over the barrier which conservative Saudi Arabia says must stem an influx of weapons.
Diplomats say Yemen claims the barrier violates a 2000 border accord which set up a 20 km (13 mile) demilitarised zone on either side of the border reserved for livestock grazing.
Ministers, defence and security officials from both sides were continuing discussions late into the night. “So far the talks are going well,” a source from one delegation said, without giving details.
Saudi Arabia and Yemen, who finally agreed the exact line of their border less than four years ago after decades of dispute, have played down the latest discord.
“Cooperation between the two countries will be reinforced in all spheres including security,” Saleh said in a statement on arrival in Riyadh.
The head of Saudi Arabia’s border guard Talal Anqawi said last week the barrier, a raised, concrete-filled pipeline which he called a security “screen”, was being built on Saudi soil but did not specify exactly where.
He also dismissed comparisons in some Yemeni opposition newspapers between the Saudi barrier and Israel’s barrier through the West Bank, which Arab states have condemned. “What is being constructed inside our borders with Yemen is a sort of screen...which aims to prevent infiltration and smuggling,” he said. “It does not resemble a wall in any way.” Yemeni sources have said the barrier extends for around 75 km along the 1,300 km border.
Well, would that be one of our mountain ranges?
I am not from the show me state, but I will be satisfied once the capture of old Osama Bin Laden is announced by President George W. Bush, or Donald Rumsfeld, or the capture is televised liked Saddam's capture. Until then I have to admit I will remain skeptical.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.