Skip to comments.
VANITY: The best way to keep America a sovereign free nation is to keep the Democrats out of power!
Free Republic
Posted on 01/29/2004 5:54:35 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Will Bush solve the illegal immigration problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the government spending problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the campaign finance problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the drug war problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the nation's education problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called healthcare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called environmental problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the social security problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the medicare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush defend America from those bent on destroying her? You'd better bet your sweet bippy he will.
Will any of the Democrats defend America? Hell no they won't. They'd rather turn us over to the U.N. They'd surrender to the French Foreign Legion if given the chance.
Will Bush appoint conservative judges? Yup!
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, appoint conservative judges? Yeah, right. And hell will freeze over tomorrow.
Will Bush continue reducing taxes? Yup.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, raise your taxes as soon as they possibly can if given the opportunity and continue raising them until hell freezes over? Yup.
Will Bush defend the right to life? Check
Will Bush defend marriage between a man a woman? Check
Will Bush defend the right to keep and bear arms? Check
Will Bush say no to Kyoto? Check.
Will Bush say no to a world court? Check.
Will Bush say no to the U.N.? Check.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, remove our national sovereignty and subjugate America to world government? Just as quickly as they possibly can if given the opportunity.
Will any other person be elected to the Presidency in 2004 other than Bush (God willing) or a Democrat? Obviously not.
Doesn't make a lick of sense to me to allow the America hating, freedom hating Democrats back into power now that we've kicked them out.
Say yes to sovereignty for America and continued freedom for all Americans.
Say no to the RATS!!
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: electionpresident; gwb2004; jimroblist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 901-920, 921-940, 941-960 ... 1,261-1,271 next last
To: Grampa Dave
To: Nanodik; Admin Moderator
Oh Nanodik...you got Zapped.
Wonder why!!??!!
922
posted on
01/30/2004 2:51:42 PM PST
by
Neets
(Complainers change their complaints, but they never reduce the amount of time spent in complaining.~)
To: deport
Pretty much SOP for any President to replace all the political appointees including the Federal Attorneys in each district/region Replace them yes .. but normally they are not all fired at once like they were in Clinton's case
923
posted on
01/30/2004 2:51:43 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
To: Indy Pendance
Wisconsin lost Bush by 5,708 votes.
I remember the threads and the non-investigation. Far less scandalous than the conduct in Missouri. If only Ashcroft had 1/10th the interest in vote fraud as he has in the Patriot Act...
924
posted on
01/30/2004 2:52:35 PM PST
by
George W. Bush
(It's the Congress, stupid.)
To: Brad's Gramma
No but probably the same dna from too much in breeding with other A$$holes.
925
posted on
01/30/2004 2:55:02 PM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(GW is driving every rat in America into a deeper insanity, 24/7/365!)
To: Brad's Gramma
Nanodik got zapped.
He will return again to insult our president and pretend to be a great conservative.
926
posted on
01/30/2004 2:57:51 PM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(GW is driving every rat in America into a deeper insanity, 24/7/365!)
To: Grampa Dave
Hope he/she/it can at LEAST come up with a decent screen name this time.
Nanodik. I mean really.
To: George W. Bush
Do you know, once Missouri asked for an extension, all the libs were asking the same here. Then our liberal ag didn't do a thing, and smokes for votes was recorded by a news team.
We have a lot of work to get rid of the liberal mindset in this country. I've posted this several times, but check it out, especially the 75th congress. It's amazing we have any conservatives left. We have a long way to go. This isn't the 18th or 19th or 20th century anymore. Times have changed, and to change the mindset of the American people, we have a lot of work to do. Just look at the mess our public schools are in. Or the judges, or the press..... the list goes on an on. We can't expect Bush to change this country's mindset in three short years. Heck, we need to start with our senators and congress, and simultaneously, changing our state and local political atmosphere. There are just too many people who don't know, don't care, or want 'free' stuff from the government. It took Dems 70 years to do that. They had a boost though, with the great depression, WWII, etc. We have to think smart, use the republican party to advance conservative ideas, not unlike the socialists and commies are using the democrat party.
To: Indy Pendance
Do you know, once Missouri asked for an extension, all the libs were asking the same here.
It didn't go anywhere though.
The Bush administration has really done absolutely nothing about this problem. Hard to understand why. I consider this years' elections to be the most likely to have massive fraud due to the new severely flawed voting machines that have been bought in so many large states.
929
posted on
01/30/2004 3:35:08 PM PST
by
George W. Bush
(It's the Congress, stupid.)
To: George W. Bush
Missouri didn't go anywhere either. What problem didn't the Bush administration address? I lost your train of thought.
To: Jim Robinson
Jim, I'm in agreement with all you're saying. I do not want to elect any Dimocrat, President or any other ofice. [although Zell Miller could be an exception]. I have not advocated voting for any Dimocrat. Voting an for alternative choice to the two parties is not the same as trying to get a Dimocrat elected. I'm displeased and very disappointed, not stupid. I've been vocal but not traitorous.
My position has always been to try to get the message across that true Conservatives are displeased with some of Bush's policy initiatives or with excessive spending on policy that's acceptable. And of course the amnesty.
There's not much I can do beyond sending emails/faxes to the Republicans except withhold my vote and make sure they know why. Unless I deem some or all of the Georgia races to be too close to risk it, I'll vote 3rd party or write in where possible. At this point, the GA contests look to be comfortable for the R's.
They don't need my vote. They do need my message.
***an ex-Republican voter***
931
posted on
01/30/2004 3:40:32 PM PST
by
citizen
(Write-in Tom Tancredo President 2004!)
To: Mo1
Replace them yes .. but normally they are not all fired at once like they were in Clinton's case
I've forgotten the details of the event..... But I think it's normal/expected for all of them to tender their resignation to the new President. They do serve at the pleasure of the President. Anyway it doesn't matter now as that is history and I hope not to have to relive it anytime soon....
932
posted on
01/30/2004 3:40:59 PM PST
by
deport
(BUSH - CHENEY 2004.........)
To: My2Cents
But go ahead and vote LP, cause Bush to lose by a hair, and then let a Democrat nominate up to four Supreme Court judges who will serve for the next 30 years. You think we've heard the LP's scream at this point? If this were to happen, we ain't heard nothin' yet!
Prairie
933
posted on
01/30/2004 3:41:38 PM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
To: Indy Pendance
I mean that in Wisconsin, they only made the request. It wasn't honored. In Missouri, they kept the polling places open by the order of a (Dim) judge so they could commit even more fraud.
And despite evidence of massive fraud, Ashcroft did very little to prosecute any of them. I think there was a little wrist-slapping of that woman doing the votes-for-smokes scam in Wisconsin but mostly, as I recall, because she came in from out of state.
The vote thieves got away clean in 2000 except for a few.
934
posted on
01/30/2004 3:42:47 PM PST
by
George W. Bush
(It's the Congress, stupid.)
To: George W. Bush
Although Missouri's is Ashcroft's state, is it up to him or the individual state's AG to prosecute? The lady with the smokes was a millionaire from the NY DNC. Money talks. And I'm sure our AG got a little something for his trouble.
To: prairiebreeze
I recall years back looking over the LP website and they were bragging about how one of their ambitions was to get enough votes to be a spoiler in any given election between the two parties. The idea being that they would favor the more 'libertarian' candidate and make the two party establishments afraid of them.
They cited a few instances in local elections where they thought they had succeeded.
936
posted on
01/30/2004 3:46:33 PM PST
by
George W. Bush
(It's the Congress, stupid.)
To: Indy Pendance
I think the AG can intervene in election fraud of national candidates. But I can't cite a law to prove it.
937
posted on
01/30/2004 3:48:34 PM PST
by
George W. Bush
(It's the Congress, stupid.)
To: citizen
Sorry, but they're not going to hear your third party or non-voting message unless you get a few million otherwise Republican voters to go along with you. And if successful in that, you will simply be ushering the Democrats back into power and your reward will be watching the judiciary swing totally over to the left. Oh well. Forty more years of court enforced liberalism. No biggie. I'll be long dead before there's any hope of conservatives ever catching up again so guess it really doesn't matter.
If you want to send them a message, I suggest you send a telegram.
938
posted on
01/30/2004 3:59:23 PM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(I don't belong to no organized political party. I'm a Republycan.)
To: George W. Bush
Might be, I don't know either. I'm sure we can find out if we want to dig, be my guest...! Maybe because there were local elections they didn't pursue it further. Anyway, I'd rather have states rights than be dictated by the feds.
It will be interesting this next election. My gut tells me the dems are going to lose big time. I hope that is the case. We need to remove them from power, completely. That's been the biggest hurdle. Although we have a majority, the dems are using all the dirty tricks for filibustering etc. Calling on 2/3 majority when that is not in fact the case. We just have to have more conservatives elected in the house and senate. The dems have had too long a stranglehold on our country. We need to eliminate them from any source of power. Make them irrelevant. For too long this country accepted their ideas. It's going to take a lot to change the way people think. And it's going to be a long process, not a one or two term thing. They've almost destroyed this country, we have to stop them. It's going to be a slow process. All of us on FR want change now, but that's now how it works. Thank God our founding fathers thought of this, because if conservatives could make a dramatic change in three years, think what a liberal could do.
To: ohioWfan
--You don't see a problem with this 'ethic?'--
Nope. Just taking what stand I can out of the limited options I have.
940
posted on
01/30/2004 4:12:41 PM PST
by
citizen
(Write-in Tom Tancredo President 2004!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 901-920, 921-940, 941-960 ... 1,261-1,271 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson