Posted on 01/29/2004 5:54:35 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Will Bush solve the illegal immigration problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the government spending problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the campaign finance problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the drug war problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the nation's education problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called healthcare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called environmental problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the social security problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the medicare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush defend America from those bent on destroying her? You'd better bet your sweet bippy he will.
Will any of the Democrats defend America? Hell no they won't. They'd rather turn us over to the U.N. They'd surrender to the French Foreign Legion if given the chance.
Will Bush appoint conservative judges? Yup!
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, appoint conservative judges? Yeah, right. And hell will freeze over tomorrow.
Will Bush continue reducing taxes? Yup.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, raise your taxes as soon as they possibly can if given the opportunity and continue raising them until hell freezes over? Yup.
Will Bush defend the right to life? Check
Will Bush defend marriage between a man a woman? Check
Will Bush defend the right to keep and bear arms? Check
Will Bush say no to Kyoto? Check.
Will Bush say no to a world court? Check.
Will Bush say no to the U.N.? Check.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, remove our national sovereignty and subjugate America to world government? Just as quickly as they possibly can if given the opportunity.
Will any other person be elected to the Presidency in 2004 other than Bush (God willing) or a Democrat? Obviously not.
Doesn't make a lick of sense to me to allow the America hating, freedom hating Democrats back into power now that we've kicked them out.
Say yes to sovereignty for America and continued freedom for all Americans.
Say no to the RATS!!
We've heard the objections to some of Bush's policies, and we've debated them. Fair enough.
But it's an election year. And unless we prefer to throw away all the accomplishments and the progress we've made under Bush I'de say it is definitely time for a "Republican Party feel-good rabble-rouser."
Unless of course you would prefer a liberal Dem in the White House.
You started out saying "Just how long have you lived in America, you Canadian transplant ?", then proceeded to claim Canadians speak out of both sides of their mouth. That's pretty clearly an attack.
You self appointed yourself toATTACK those you disagree with, who posted to those THEY disagree with and who,BTW, are diametrically opposed to the vast majority of the members of this site and its owner. Jim is here, I'm certain that the Mods are too, and YOU are not needed here,pretending that you are some kind of "peace officer ". Take your smarmy,supercilious, pompous postings someplace else.
First I'll point out that now you're attacking me (but that's okay). Second I'll point out that the Lead Moderator him/herself has encouraged self policing on the part of posters. That's all I'm attempting here. No "smarmy, supercilious pompous" manner intended. Sorry you took it that way.
As far as going somewhere else, I'll be going to bed soon, so I guess in that respect I'll be obliging your offer. You have a nice night.
Actually, I do. However, it seems to be distracting people who are easily distracted. Therefore, to faciliate communication, I'll take it off.
So the want it?? ... No
However, Do you think a Dem President will have the balls to fight and prevent it??
The way they are talking about getting a permission slip from the French .. Just shows they have no balls
Sadly, I wouldn't have had a say. I'm a girl.
You think that Bush hewing to socialist and unconsitutional ideas is silly.
I view it as more tragic than silly.
Neets has taken care of that
Yep, Neets listed a bunch from the nauseating litany.... puts it into perspective!
What a strange comment. I couldn't care less what gender you are, although folks like yourself continue to try and make it an issue on this thread. All I'm interested in is good conversation - I've seldom bothered myself with finding out poster's demographics.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.