Skip to comments.
Girl killed in park [Jackass] stunt.(Merry-go-round+rope+truck=dead)
http://www.appeal-democrat.com ^
| 1-19-04
| Daniel Witter
Posted on 01/19/2004 8:38:23 AM PST by OXENinFLA
Girl killed in park stunt
A 16-year-old Marysville girl died in a city park Saturday as she duplicated a movie stunt that involved a merry-go-round.
The victim, whose name was not released, died in S.J. Field Park on Rideout Way before 6 p.m., after she flew off a merry-go-round and hit her head on the street pavement, according to the Marysville Police Department.
According to witnesses, seven teenagers attached a rope to a truck and wrapped it around a merry-go-round, then watched it spin as the truck pulled the rope away from the ride. The stunt was previously performed in "Jackass: The Movie."
(Excerpt) Read more at appeal-democrat.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: California; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: jackass; stupid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 next last
To: Colonel Jim
What goes around comes around; tragically!& around,& around,& around,& around,...................
To: discostu
Was just teasing... I'm a fool for nostalgia myself.
102
posted on
01/19/2004 9:47:11 AM PST
by
Tijeras_Slim
(Death before dhimmi.)
To: dead
103
posted on
01/19/2004 9:48:46 AM PST
by
discostu
(and the tenor sax is blowing its nose)
To: Quilla
Since you're involved in hunting and shooting sports, I'd wager your kids have an excellent grounding in actions and their potential consequences. They probably don't hang out with idiots either.
104
posted on
01/19/2004 9:48:47 AM PST
by
Tijeras_Slim
(Death before dhimmi.)
To: Quilla
I couldn't agree with you more. The point of my response was to show how you can almost see the vultures circling.
Sadly, that's the reason why there are so many warning labels on every thing today. Next, merry-go-rounds will have labels: Do not exceed 15 RPM. Do not attach to automobile. Do not.....
Next thing you know, they'll ban Wily E. Coyote (my hero)
105
posted on
01/19/2004 9:49:35 AM PST
by
par4
To: Travis McGee
By 2020, everyone under the age of 18 will have to wear an approved helmet at all times outside of their homes. What kind of reckless talk is that? What if someone slips in the shower, or falls down the stairs? That helmet could have saved their life.
Just to be on the safe side, you're going to want to keep a suppy of helmets (and operating instructions in all major languages) next to your front door, so that in the event of visitors (or burglars) there will be enough helmets to go around.
106
posted on
01/19/2004 9:49:55 AM PST
by
Steel Wolf
("Inveniemus viam aut faciemus" - We will either find a way or make one.)
To: OXENinFLA
Yet another mere coincidence involving Jackass.
107
posted on
01/19/2004 9:50:42 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: bonfire
Actually, it sounds like the antics my husband and his 3 brothers pulled. They are all lucky to be alive!Over the years, most of my friends and I have come to the same conclusion.
Based on today's nanny state, none of us should have lived to age 5.
108
posted on
01/19/2004 9:56:39 AM PST
by
Elric@Melnibone
(Adventure is worthy in itself. - Amelia Earhart)
To: Tijeras_Slim
Their friends are indeed quite responsible, well mannered, and joys to be around. Last night my son had about 15 friends over and they cooked on the grill. One young man provided all the meat - a deer he had killed a couple of weeks ago. My only complaint - when they all cranked up their trucks to leave - it sounded like a Flowmaster convention. :-)
109
posted on
01/19/2004 9:57:20 AM PST
by
Quilla
To: big ern
When you outlaw merry-go-rounds,...I thought they had already been "outlawed". Don't think I've seen more than 1 on a playground in the last 5 years (at least) and that one hasn't been there for the last 2 years.
110
posted on
01/19/2004 9:58:24 AM PST
by
Elric@Melnibone
(Adventure is worthy in itself. - Amelia Earhart)
To: Travis McGee
"By 2020, everyone under the age of 18 will have to wear an approved helmet at all times outside of their homes."
Not everyone. Just those that are registered 'Democrat' . . .they're a danger to themselves and others in this country . . . .
Plus, they will be easier to pick out in a crowd . . . or targets in a crowd, whichever you please.
(Oh, and color the helmets 'Pacifist BLUE', the libs fav color.)
111
posted on
01/19/2004 9:59:09 AM PST
by
BluSky
(“Don’t make me come down there.”)
To: Pukin Dog
I told my wife if one of our neighbors goes looney, I will tell any reporter or interviewer that wants to hear, "I knew that guy just wasn't right. He was mean and spitefull and just plain evil. Did I imagine something like this happening? Hell, I'm shocked it didn't happen sooner."
112
posted on
01/19/2004 10:05:45 AM PST
by
dpa5923
(Small minds talk about people, normal minds talk about events, great minds talk about ideas.)
To: Tijeras_Slim
24 yards is pretty good. Assuming a weight of 120 for the victim, I'd love to see somebody do the math on what the rotational speed of that thing was.
Her weight shouldn't come into play -- much like a bullet fired horizontially from a gun will land on the ground at the same time one is dropped from your hand.
So figure the truck is the bullet and the speed of the bullet (Vh) is how fast the truck was going before she let go. The only other variable to consider is consider how high (H) off the ground she was when she let go.
She has two components of motion: tangenial to the merry go around (Vh, Ah = 0 where A == acceleration) and toward mean old earth (Av = 9.8m/s^2).
H = Vv * t + 1/2 * Av * t^2 where t == seconds aloft.
Since she had no downward velocity (Vv) to start off with this simplifies to H = 4.9*t^2. If the H = 1.5 meters that means she was aloft for (1.5/4.9)^0.5 = 0.55 seconds.
How far does this travel? That's D = Vh * t.
Since we know the distance of 24 yards = 9.1 meters:
9.1 meters = Velocity * 0.55 seconds
Or the velocity is 16.5 meters / s =
37 MPH
For the merry go round the velocity at an outside point is V = radius * radians / second = radius * RPM * 2*pi / 60
Pluging in 37MPH =
54 feet / second = 2 * radius * (RPM) * pi / 60 = Diameter * RPM / 19.1
Figuring a typical merry go round diameter of 10 feet that works out to be 54 ft / second = 10 ft * (RPM) / 19.1
100 revolutions per minute.
Keep in mind its been 10 years since I did anything with Excel so I could of screwed up somewhere. But 37MPH sounds about right if you have enough rope wrapped around the merry go round. Also I'm not accounting for things like wind resistance and the flailing of the individual.
113
posted on
01/19/2004 10:09:03 AM PST
by
lelio
To: r9etb
If we assume a radius of 4 feet for the merry-go-round, the ejection speed of 50 feet/second corresponds to an angular rate of 12.5 radians/second, or about 120 rpm.
Phew! Looks like I did my math right.
The next step is to figure out the acceleration of the truck and how many yards of rope they needs to wrap around the merry go round.
This should be given to the friends of the victim to do. Turn that frown upside down!
114
posted on
01/19/2004 10:12:13 AM PST
by
lelio
To: lelio
Also I'm not accounting for things like wind resistance and the flailing of the individual.CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS FOR THE CONTROL GROUP!
115
posted on
01/19/2004 10:13:28 AM PST
by
Tijeras_Slim
(Death before dhimmi.)
To: Thinkin' Gal
www.appeal-democrat.com???
Does this mean that now that she's dead she will be voting Democrat?
116
posted on
01/19/2004 10:18:16 AM PST
by
N. Theknow
(Be a glowworm, a glowworm's never glum, cuz how can you be grumpy when the sun shines out your bum.)
To: lelio
The next step is to figure out the acceleration of the truck and how many yards of rope they needs to wrap around the merry go round. If the rope was wrapped around the outside (which is likely), and the girl was hanging on near the outside of the merry-go-round, then the truck was going about as fast as the girl was -- about 35 mph.
They had a couple of ropes tied together -- figure 150 feet of rope. With a powerful truck, a stomp on the gas would get them them to 35 in 150 feet.
117
posted on
01/19/2004 10:32:05 AM PST
by
r9etb
To: N. Theknow
"Does this mean that now that she's dead she will be voting Democrat?"
Yep! And more evidence for the new democrat clause in the Voters Rights Act called the 'wouldof, couldof' amendment:
Any potential voter above the age of 12 shall have the right to express their vote in accordance with the rules and regulations of said state for what would be a given lifespan of 105 years (adjusted upwardly based upon updated average lifespans) in the event this person were to expire or unable to meet his obligations to cast their ballot based on numerous physical obstructions (as determined by the ACLU), handicaps or other less likely occurances as deemed only by the DNC, anytime prior to reaching 105 years of age. The council of the DNC shall deem that this amendment clause applys to only registered democrat voters, families of democrat voters, those that think they are democrat/liberals, those that think like democrats/liberals, environmentalist radicals, eco-terrorists and their families carte blanche and, their offspring to infinity and beyond. This amendment shall be final and/or amended only as the DNC see's fit and passed without representation into law. Votes cast in this regard shall be tabulated without question and counted towards satisfying the election of said democrat.
Examples follow:
. . . "Had she voted, she 'wouldof' voted for a democrat!"
. . . "Had they voted, he/she 'couldof' voted for a democrat!"
118
posted on
01/19/2004 10:55:43 AM PST
by
BluSky
(“Don’t make me come down there.”)
To: BallandPowder
Oh, yes. Defnitely in the running. Especially since she hadn't reproduced, yet.
119
posted on
01/19/2004 11:05:59 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: dpa5923
I told my wife if one of our neighbors goes looney, I will tell any reporter or interviewer that wants to hear, "I knew that guy just wasn't right. He was mean and spitefull and just plain evil. Did I imagine something like this happening? Hell, I'm shocked it didn't happen sooner."I'm dating myself, but back in the Eddie Murphy days of Saturday Night Live, they did a long-running sketch/series where Buckwheat was shot (I believe Alfalfa did it).
They would go around asking people that knew Alfalfa questions about his character. Kind of a "what do you think of Alfalfa?" and the person would respond "Alfalfa was a great person, real friendly and nice to the kids". It was followed by "Do you think he shot Buckwheat?" and the same person that just talked about how nice Alfalfa was, would respond "Oh yeah, I think he shot Buckwheat, that was all he ever talked about, was shooting Buckwheat". My memory is hazy, but you get the gist of it.
I've always wondered if anybody ever gave their honest opinion on these matters, like if they knew somebody was nuts or stupid, but yet when the cameras roll, they talk about how nice, smart, etc. they are.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson