Skip to comments.
Conservative groups break with Republican leadership
The Washington Times ^
| 1/16/2004
| Ralph Z. Hallow
Posted on 01/17/2004 2:58:56 PM PST by Ricardo4CP
National leaders of six conservative organizations yesterday broke with the Republican majorities in the House and Senate, accusing them of spending like "drunken sailors," and had some strong words for President Bush as well...
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: amnestyforillegals; armey; beckner; bush; bush43; constitution; cpac; healthcare; hispander; panderer; pandering; party; pork; prescriptiondrug; socializedmedicine; spending; weyrich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 441-457 next last
To: jimkress; All
You can't expect people to take you seriously with a list of patently false crap like that.
221
posted on
01/17/2004 5:22:33 PM PST
by
NewLand
(Gore speech on global warming cancelled due to record cold!)
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
The Constitution Party isn't so virtuous. I remember Howard Philips ads before the 2000 election. He was running against Bush, not Gore. I realized then Philips was no different than any other candidate. He was doing it for his own ego. They got less than one percent of the vote in 2000. They are egotists just like Buchanan. They are spoilers and nothing more.
To: jgrubbs
At least your Congresscritter has the motivation to reply back to you. Every single one of mine (Republican and Democrat) largely ignore my correspondance.
To: Willie Green
I was pretty riled up as we can all get from time to time, but civility is an absolute necessity. United we Stand, Divided we Fall.
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
I am quite aggressive. My only fault is, I come off as hateful. LOL :)
To: BigSkyFreeper
So your going to hang Bush for it, and let your Congresscritter get off so easily as to say he could care less what you think?That brand of Congressman wouldn't get my vote from that point on, I don't care which party he/she belonged to. He won't get my vote, I told him, "I would remember how he voted the next time I vote". I'm not hanging Bush for it, I just see him supporting and promoting the spending bills and other liberal agenda's. He is the first President in quite a long time to NOT veto any spending bills.
226
posted on
01/17/2004 5:24:21 PM PST
by
jgrubbs
To: jimkress
"Save America from the tyranny of Republican/Democrat hegemony. Support the Constitution Party." LOL. How many millions of members have you signed up now? How many states will the Constitution Party win in '04? Will they win a single electoral vote? Or seat a single Senator or Congessman?
227
posted on
01/17/2004 5:24:45 PM PST
by
Jim Robinson
(I don't belong to no organized political party. I'm a Republycan.)
To: sauropod
I believe you will find my post respectful.I am not a boot licker,I don't think Bush's policies are all OK,I don't like the immigration proposal with no stick.
I do support Bush for President.I don't believe the dems are good for this country.We are in a very serious time in history.I trust Bush.I would love your vote for Bush for President,too.
228
posted on
01/17/2004 5:26:14 PM PST
by
MEG33
(We Got Him!)
To: normy
That is what it looks like, maybe that is not what he is doing, but it sure looks like he would much rather cozy up to the demo rats and leave his base at home.
Much like the demo rats do to the blacks.
Cause where are the conservatives going to go, to a third party candidate or stay at home?
229
posted on
01/17/2004 5:26:22 PM PST
by
dts32041
("Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed" RAH)
To: Jim Robinson
LOL. How many millions of members have you signed up now? How many states will the Constitution Party win in '04? Will they win a single electoral vote? Or seat a single Senator or Congessman?Those are probably the same kind of questions they were asking about the Republican Party when it came on the scene as a new "third party" back in the 1800's.
230
posted on
01/17/2004 5:27:08 PM PST
by
jgrubbs
To: BigSkyFreeper
Read it, study it, memorize it, I don't care. If it bothers you that much, so be it. It should bother you, not me.
231
posted on
01/17/2004 5:27:45 PM PST
by
eskimo
To: Columbine
They got less than one percent of the vote in 2000. They are egotists just like Buchanan. They are spoilers and nothing more.Yup. Truth is, we're all human beings. There is no perfect candidate. We must go for the best we can get and Bush is a heck of a lot better than any Dumbocrat.
To: jgrubbs
I am sure you will find voting for Bush will be better for now.
233
posted on
01/17/2004 5:29:51 PM PST
by
MEG33
(We Got Him!)
To: Jim Robinson
Democrats or Republicans, the results are the same. Sad to see you admit you are in favor of the welfare state and a destruction of our Liberty since that's what you'll get with either of your selections.
234
posted on
01/17/2004 5:30:30 PM PST
by
jimkress
(Save America from the tyranny of Republican/Democrat hegemony. Support the Constitution Party.)
To: RJCogburn
Okay...in the last three "we" have grown the government more than at any time since LBJ.In the last three years "we" (with no help from you) have put Al Qaeda on the run, captured hundreds of them, captured Saddam Hussein, put the Taliban out of business, and thwarted several AQ attacks, liberated the Afghanis and the Iraqis, freed Iraqi children from prison, stopped the mass murder and torture -- not to mention outlawed PBA, took a stand against joining the ICC, got a good conservative Judge in the Fifth Circuit, received several tax cuts, just for starters.
235
posted on
01/17/2004 5:30:38 PM PST
by
alnick
(The American people would rather reach for the stars than reach for excuses why we shouldn't.)
To: dts32041
I hope you will consider voting for Bush for President.
236
posted on
01/17/2004 5:31:06 PM PST
by
MEG33
(We Got Him!)
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
We must go for the best we can get and Bush is a heck of a lot better than any DumbocratDon't you mean, who has the best chance of winning, not the best candidate. Remember how the conservatives stabbed McClintock in the back to support the liberal Schwarzenegger.
237
posted on
01/17/2004 5:32:05 PM PST
by
jgrubbs
To: MEG33
I do support Bush for President.I don't believe the dems are good for this country. The only difference between the Republicans and the Democrats is that the Democrats want the US ruled by a combination of national and international despots while the Republicans will settle for tyranny by just national despots. The end result is the same - the destruction of our freedom.
Given the objectives of both parties are the same, how can anyone justify supporting either party?
238
posted on
01/17/2004 5:32:17 PM PST
by
jimkress
(Save America from the tyranny of Republican/Democrat hegemony. Support the Constitution Party.)
To: B Knotts
...but it's about time some of these groups did something like this to get the GOP's attention.Yeah, by joining together to exert some real clout. Fragmenting Conservatives across the Republican, Constitution, Libertarian, and other assorted Parties, as suggested by some on the "Right," is a formula for disaster.
239
posted on
01/17/2004 5:32:24 PM PST
by
Consort
To: jimkress
I believe in this country.I love this country.I'll be voting for Bush,the best choice.
240
posted on
01/17/2004 5:33:46 PM PST
by
MEG33
(We Got Him!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 441-457 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson