|
||||
Posted on 01/05/2004 9:33:00 AM PST by Solson
By John Whitesides, Political Correspondent
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Retired four-star Gen. Wesley Clark (news - web sites) made a splashy but late entrance into the 2004 White House race, riding a gold-plated resume to the top tier of the Democratic pack before a series of early missteps sent him tumbling.
|
|
||||||
But Clark, a quick study as a Rhodes scholar and the top cadet in his class at West Point, has since found his voice on the campaign trail and says he is tailor-made for a race against President Bush (news - web sites) in which national security and foreign policy will play prominent roles.
"This is an election that's going to be about national security," Clark, a former NATO (news - web sites) commander who directed the 1999 bombing campaign in Kosovo, said in a December debate with his eight Democratic rivals in the first primary state of New Hampshire.
"It's going to be about facing down George Bush and his failure to perform his duties satisfactorily as commander in chief," he said. "I'm the only candidate ... who can take that fight to George W. Bush."
Clark, spurred on by a well-organized Internet campaign that tried to draft him into the Democratic race, declared his candidacy with a burst of publicity on Sept. 17.
An early critic of the war in Iraq (news - web sites), he stumbled on his first campaign trip over whether he would have supported a congressional resolution authorizing military action. He initially told reporters he probably would have, then switched his stance 24 hours later.
His Democratic rivals also questioned his party credentials, noting he had voted for Republican Presidents Ronald Reagan (news - web sites) and Richard Nixon and praised Bush at a Republican fund-raiser in 2001.
Even though Clark quickly shot near the top of many national polls, he drifted down over the next few weeks. His campaign staff went through several shake-ups, and he decided in October to skip Iowa's party caucuses on Jan. 19, calculating he did not have the organization to compete there.
With a more seasoned staff in place, many taken from the failed campaign of Florida Sen. Bob Graham, Clark has focused on doing well enough in the New Hampshire primary on Jan. 27 to position himself for a breakthrough in the seven more moderate Southern and Western states that hold contests on Feb. 3.
He gave a series of policy speeches to flesh out his sometimes sketchy stands on foreign and domestic issues, proposing guaranteed health care coverage for all children, calling for an army of civilian domestic volunteers and laying out steps to expand international involvement in Iraq and mend relations with Europe.
GRABBING THE FLAG
By December, Clark's stump speech blended tough criticism of Bush as a commander in chief with reminders of his own service, including a decorated stint in Vietnam in which he was wounded.
At a convention of Florida Democrats in early December, he dramatically grabbed a flag from the back of the stage and planted it at the podium, holding it with one hand as he declared it "our flag."
"We'll never let George W. Bush, Tom DeLay or John Ashcroft (news - web sites) tell us we don't have this flag," he said, referring to the House Republican leader and the attorney general. "America must do better than this president."
Clark, a native of Arkansas like former Democratic President Bill Clinton (news - web sites), has been aided by several members of Clinton's administration and won praise from Clinton, who appointed him NATO commander.
Described as a brilliant, hard-working but thin-skinned perfectionist while at NATO, he has been criticized by some of his former military colleagues -- most notably Hugh Shelton, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who raised questions about his character and integrity.
Clark called the comments, never explained by Shelton, modern-day "McCarthyism" prompted by disagreements over policy while Clark was heading the military campaign in Bosnia.
"He's the man for the job," a senior Pentagon (news - web sites) official said of Clark when he was named NATO commander. "Clark is bright, scholarly and affable. And he can negotiate with presidents and governments as well as dealing with military counterparts."
By the time he left in 1999, Clark had antagonized Pentagon superiors with what they viewed as a self-promoting style and with his arguments in Kosovo that preparing ground attacks and an invasion was the only way to convince the Serbs that NATO was determined to do what was necessary to win.
A senior member of the U.S. team that helped broker the 1995 Dayton peace accords on Bosnia, Clark testified in The Hague (news - web sites) in December at the war crimes trial of former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic (news - web sites), calling it "a very, very satisfying experience."
He acknowledged during the campaign he made a mistake in a 1994 meeting with Bosnian Serb Gen. Ratko Mladic, posing for pictures with him, exchanging hats and accepting a bottle of brandy and a pistol. Mladic, an indicted war criminal, is accused of slaughtering thousands of civilians.
The 59-year-old Clark, who speaks Russian, has one son with his wife, Gert.
| Rank | Location | Receipts | Donors/Avg | Freepers/Avg | Monthlies | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Armed Forces - Pacific |
|
|
|
|
|
10.00 |
1 |
|
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
The right needs to wake up a bit and understand what is happening.
http://www.rnc.org/Newsroom/RNCResearch/pollwatch.htm
Clark does almost as well as Rev. Al in SC depending which poll you look at. LOL. Sorry, Solson. Polling 2nd or 3rd in most states means LOSING in most states. Clark is toast. Has been since day one.
I am not betting my butt on that.
Wow! When I get that drunk I can hardly walk, much less write an article.
The Left knows that a new candidate must come forth, and the current leading candidate must be pushed down. It's not much of a hope, but it's all they have.
I see that as a concerted effort to have content for their publications. They can highlight his strong points, his negative points, round in circles all they want. I don't see a conspiracy. Just journalism.
The Left knows that a new candidate must come forth, and the current leading candidate must be pushed down. It's not much of a hope, but it's all they have.
I don't know if they do know that. I am sure SOME believe that, and since not a single vote has been cast, they can hope all they want. But when the votes are counted, it ain't gonna be Clark. He's a bigger psycho than Dean, and he proves it quickly. Watch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
