Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Folks, Wesley Clark, not Howard Dean should be the focus of our scrutiny. He will be the Democratic nominee.
1 posted on 01/05/2004 9:33:01 AM PST by Solson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
Armed Forces - Pacific




10.00
1

Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

2 posted on 01/05/2004 9:34:32 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Solson
I think Clark's a bigger loony tune than Dean! Too bad he sucks in the polls!
3 posted on 01/05/2004 9:36:02 AM PST by Huck (This space available--monthly rates---great exposure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Solson
I agree 100 percent.
4 posted on 01/05/2004 9:36:46 AM PST by Howlin (Bush has stolen two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Solson
riding a gold-plated resume to the top tier of the Democratic pack

Wow! When I get that drunk I can hardly walk, much less write an article.

15 posted on 01/05/2004 9:50:02 AM PST by N. Theknow (Be a glowworm, a glowworm's never glum, cuz how can you be grumpy when the sun shines out your bum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Solson
Come on you West Pointers and other Military people, post what you have been telling me! A man who was not to be followed into combat, is hardly the man to lead this nation.
17 posted on 01/05/2004 9:52:11 AM PST by yoe (Mirror, mirror on the wall............the Clark mantra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Solson
Uh dude, this was written by Reuters. You know the press agency that mandated a couple of days after 9/11, that the terrorists shouldn't be called terrorists.
22 posted on 01/05/2004 9:57:17 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Solson
Wesley Clark lost his shine about 3 days after entering the race. I don't know why you consider him the favorite.
26 posted on 01/05/2004 9:59:21 AM PST by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Solson
While I'm a bit more worried about Clark than many seem to be, I can't see how one could currently think he's definitely going to be the nominee.

1. Clark got in late. Not even campaigning in Iowa.
2. Dean has far more money.
3. Dean has Gore's endorsement, 1 senator and like 13 reps. He's picking up Bill Bradley's today.
4. Dean has union endorsements.
5. Dean has by far the best organization of any of the Dems. His supporters are kooky, but numerous and dedicated.
6. Clark just isn't polished and it shows.
7. Dean has the highest name recognition.
8. If Dean wins IA and NH, he'll get a boost in fundraising and probably enough momentum to pull off a SC victory as well.

It's not impossible, but Clark is still a long shot. Bush will crush either of them in the general election.
37 posted on 01/05/2004 10:23:14 AM PST by zencat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Solson
Interesting headline from REUTERS. Five days into the new year, and Clark hasn't put a major foot into his mouth yet, if you don't count that "joke" about Dean the skier.

Give him a little more time.
38 posted on 01/05/2004 11:05:20 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Solson
He will be the Democratic nominee.

Doesn't matter. He's a nutcase as well.

His tax "reform" plan raises taxes. Bush will kill him with that.

And, he will likely be confronted by those in the military who know him well.

Bush's record speaks for itself. Dean and Clark are the two mental unstables in the race, and they're leading in the polls. What does that say about Democrats?

39 posted on 01/05/2004 11:13:06 AM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Solson
"It's going to be about facing down George Bush and his failure to perform his duties satisfactorily as commander in chief,"

This is lunacy on Clark's part. President Bush may have weaknesses but they are not military ones.

40 posted on 01/05/2004 11:16:03 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Happy New Year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Solson
Nope, nope, nope! The Dem nominee: Dean. Sit back and watch it happen.

-Dan
44 posted on 01/05/2004 12:04:46 PM PST by Flux Capacitor (FOUR MORE IN '04!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Solson
Please join me as a I laugh at Wesley Clark for crying "McCarthyism" in response to his former boss's remarks that he was relieved of duty for reasons of character and integrity. Inappropriate, glib use of the term "McCarthyism", use of "Hitler card", or "race card" automatically results in well informed people laughing at you until you learn not to do this.
45 posted on 01/05/2004 1:38:38 PM PST by jagrmeister (I'm not a conservative. I don't seek to conserve, I seek to reform.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson