Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Help Block The Rove Amnesty Plan In Congress, Contact These Congressmen
Pubbie | 1/04/04 | Pubbie

Posted on 01/04/2004 8:16:18 PM PST by Pubbie

Fellow Freepers, we need to try to block the Bush Amnesty Proposal that is being prepared to be released on Wednesday, by Freeping the GOP members of the House Judiciary Committee:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A52647-2004Jan3.html

The gist of the Washington Post story is that Bush will propose 3 major components on Wednesday:

1) Give an amnesty to an unspecified amount of Illegal Aliens (Probably a little less than 500,000 people.)

2) Give some sort of Social Security benefits to Illegal Aliens.

3) Create some sort of Guest Worker program.

I believe that if we put enough grass roots pressure on the GOP House Judiciary Committee members (who are listed below) we can have parts 1 and 2 completely removed from any bill in the House, and have part 3 considerably watered down if a large amount of us protest by Phoning/Faxing/E-Mailing the GOP members of the House Judiciary Committee and demanding that they reject the Amnesty (Below is a list of how to contact all members of the GOP House Judiciary Committee memebers).

Now the Buchananites here on FR will no doubt say "The GOP doesn't listen to us/There is no difference between the two parties/ blah blah blah...". But they are wrong, there is considerable opposition within the House GOP to any amnesty for Illegal immigrants.

In August 2001 the House GOP was ready to rebel against the President and kill off the original Bush Amnesty proposal, until the 911 attacks buried the plan.

All GOP politicians (With the apparent exception of Bush and Rove) know very well that illegal immigrants won't vote for Republicans.

Think about it, all politicians absolutely MUST know who is and isn't going to vote for them.

The GOP has studied the 2000 and 2002 Election Exit polls in excruciating detail, and there is no evidence whatsoever that the GOP got any headway in the Latino vote in 2002. Furthermore polls show that no headway will be made by the GOP in the 2004 election.

That is why a number of major Republican politicians in November and December of 2003 have publicly said that there was major hostility to any Amnesty program within Congress.

For Example:

* Texas Governor Rick Perry said (during a meeting with Vicente Fox no less) that there was no support for any sort of Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants in Congress.

* Arizona Senator John Kyl said the McCain/Kolbe Amnesty bill, and other Illegal Immigrant bills, would be impossible to pass in 2004.

* Texas Congressman Lamar Smith (Who sits on the Judiciary Committee) said after the Ridge Trial balloon for Amnesty to all Illegal Immigrants:

"I don't see a substantial change in immigration policy in an election year," said Rep. Lamar Smith, R-San Antonio, a House immigration subcommittee member who has expressed concern that an amnesty program for illegal immigrants could harm national security."

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dallas/nation/stories/121203dnnatimmigration.76a1.html

* And Finally Tom Tancredo said in the same article:

"We have enough support on our side to stop them from liberalizing immigration law," said Mr. Tancredo, R" Colo. "And on the other hand, I don't think I have enough [support] to advance our agenda. So, that's why I think we are sort of at loggerheads."

What we Freepers need to do is, instead of voting for the Constitution Party:

1) Phone up the below members of the GOP House Judiciary Committee Members (Who are all listed below) to complain about this Amnesty plan and tell them not to pass it.

2) Fax these Congressmen to tell them to reject the plan.

3) Email these Congressmen to reject an amnesty.

If enough of us complain, it will help block the major portions of the White House's plan in the House where most Republican Congressmen are already very leary of an Amnesty plan.

PS: In your letters/phone calls/E-mails to the below Congressmen, do NOT use any vulgarity.

Regards,

Pubbie

***REPUBLICAN HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE MEMBERS***

*Chairman Of The Committee, James Sensenbrenner*

Washington, D.C. Office To write about issues pending in Congress, internships, flags, or tours, contact: 2449 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515-4905 Telephone: (202) 225-5101

My e-mail address is sensenbrenner@mail.house.gov. If you contact me through e-mail, please include your postal mailing address.

*Henry Hyde*

Washington D.C. 2110 Rayburn House Office Building Washington D.C. 20515 Phone: (202) 225-4561 Fax: (202) 225-1166

*Howard Coble*

Washington, DC 2468 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515-3306 Phone: 202.225.3065 Fax: 202.225.8611

EMAIL: howard.coble@mail.house.gov

*Lamar Smith*

Washington D.C. Office 2231 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 202-225-4236 202-225-8628 fax

*Elton Gallegly*

Office of Congressman Elton Gallegly 2427 Rayburn HOB Washington, DC 20515-0523 Phone: (202) 225-5811 FAX: (202) 225-1100

*Bob Goodlatte*

Washington, DC Office: 2240 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 (202) 225-5431 (202) 225-9681 fax

*Steve Chabot*

Washington Office

129 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515

(202) 225-2216 (202) 225-3012 (fax)

*Bill Jenkins*

Congressman Bill Jenkins 1207 Longworth Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Phone No. (202) 225-6356 Fax. (202) 225-5714

*Chris Cannon*

Washington Office 118 Cannon House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Phone: (202) 225-7751 Fax: (202) 225-5629 Email: cannon.ut03@mail.house.gov

*Spencer Bachus*

Washington, D.C. Office 442 Cannon Building Washington, D.C. 20515 202 225-4921 phone 202 225-2082 fax

*John Hostettler*

Washington, DC Office 1214 Longworth House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 TEL: (202) 225-4636 FAX: (202) 225-3284

Email- John.Hostettler@mail.house.gov

*Mark Green*

Congressman Mark Green 1314 Longworth Bldg. Washington, D.C. 20515 Phone: (202) 225-5665 Fax: (202) 225-5729

Mark.Green@mail.house.gov

*Ric Keller*

Washington Office:

419 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Phone (202) 225-2176 Fax (202) 225-0999

*Melissa Hart*

Washington, DC Office 1508 Longworth House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Ph. 202-225-2565 Fx. 202-226-2274

*Jeff Flake*

Washington, DC Office Address:

424 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515-0301

(202) 225-2635 - phone (202) 226-4386 - fax

*Mike Pence*

In Washington DC 1605 Longworth HOB Washington, DC 20515 (202) 225-3021 office (202) 225-3382 fax

*J. Randy Forbes*

WASHINGTON DC OFFICE 307 Cannon House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Phone: 202-225-6365 Fax: 202-226-1170

*Steve King*

Washington, D.C. Office Office of Congressman Steve King 1432 Longworth Office Building Washington D.C. 20515 (202) 225-4426 Fax: (202) 225-3193

*John Carter*

Washington, D.C. Office 408 CHOB Washington, D.C. 20515 (202) 225-3864

*Tom Feeney*

Washington, D.C. Office

323 Cannon House Office Building Washington DC 20515 phone:(202) 225-2706 fax:(202) 226-6299

*Marsha Blackburn*

509 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 202-225-2811 202-225-3004 fax


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Free Republic; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; immigration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-233 next last
To: Howlin
"If that offends you, go somewhere else."

It doesn't bother me that much that most of their workers appear to be mainly Spanish speakers. What bothers me is that there appears to be a bit of segregation (whether self-segregation or not) going on.

I've gone to the El Pollo Locos (http://elpolloloco.com/) in Atwater and Glendale dozens of times. I might have seen one or two "Anglos," one or two blacks, and the aforementioned Armenian, working there. That's it. Why is that? Don't whites or blacks apply to work at those locations? Are they discouraged from applying? Do they find it difficult to work there for, oh, one reason or another?
81 posted on 01/04/2004 9:40:03 PM PST by lonewacko_dot_com (http://lonewacko.com/blog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael
The extension of 245i was merely a procedural issue, it was never pushed through. It involved a change in the penalty for being here illegally.

The point is that few here are asking themselves why all the suddenly the left (Washington Post) is so hot to trot on an issue that they seldom paid any attention to in the past?

Could it possibly have something to do with the upcoming elections?

I know some illegal immigrants as well, and lots and lots of native-born Americans who think worse of this country than any one of the illegal immigrants do.

All in all, the solution to this issue is complex, and the roots of the problem are not advertised.

Americans overall want less legal immigration, yet, we are giving birth at way below the replacement rate, and killing a million fetuses yearly to boot.

We also want low taxes, low prices on consumer goods, and tons of services.

Our population is aging, just like in Europe. There, they are repopulating themselves with Muslims, we have Mexico, and the Hispanic Americas. I'll take Hispanics over Muslims any day of the week.

One last thing.

The baby boomers are starting to retire at an astounding rate, we cannot maintain the worker to retiree ratio needed to float the SSA any longer, and the birth facts listed above are adding to our inability to maintain these ratios at pre-millenium levels.

If these figures continue at their predicted rates, we could feasibly allow the entire working age population of Mexico into the U.S. by the year 2050, and still not maintain the SSA viable vis a vis the current worker to retiree ratio.

Eye opening reading material.

Most here like to call me a troll, but I insist that until we understand the roots of this issue, we will never find a solution.

82 posted on 01/04/2004 9:43:41 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
"Racist"?

This proposal only impacts people who have returned to Mexico!

Why the hell do I even bother?

83 posted on 01/04/2004 9:45:03 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: WilliamofCarmichael
For what it's worth, here are some organized thoughts on the subject of illegal immigration.
84 posted on 01/04/2004 9:47:36 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
Tancredo is a nut.

Tancredo is NOT a nut. He will get my write-in vote for President.
85 posted on 01/04/2004 9:49:22 PM PST by Travelgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie

86 posted on 01/04/2004 9:50:36 PM PST by dagnabbit (Suport Amnesty 2007 ! For illegals arriving after Bush's 04 amnesty. It's never too early to care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Before you do anything, you should actually SEE the proposed actions, not take the word of an virulently liberal, anti-Bush rag like the Compost.

We did that with campaign finance reform and then it was too late. We don't want to take that chance on amnesty.
87 posted on 01/04/2004 9:52:19 PM PST by Travelgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Really. This is ridiculous. Perhaps we should wait and hear the actual proposal.

An amnesty can make sense, if certain other actions are taken first.
88 posted on 01/04/2004 9:56:19 PM PST by TheDon (Have a Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Travelgirl
I think writing in Tancredo is vitally important in the Republican primary and caucus season.

While Bush is obviously going to be the nominee, a noticable vote against his craven open-borders pandering, may help drive the point home that the base ain't happy with his antics.

89 posted on 01/04/2004 10:01:48 PM PST by dagnabbit (Suport Amnesty 2007 ! For illegals arriving after Bush's 04 amnesty. It's never too early to care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
""Racist"?
This proposal only impacts people who have returned to Mexico!"

Anything that the Norteamericanos do that's not what Vicente wants will be portrayed as racist/mean-spirited/dog-kicking by Vicente's friends in the CA legislature, the Spanish-language media, the L.A. Times, and at various institutions of higher learning.

See, for instance, some of the quotes at www.vdare.com/awall/saltillo.htm

“Xenophobia divides the legislators” - newspaper headline

"Another Chihuahua legislator, Victor Hugo Estala, called U.S. immigration policy “xenophobic, de-humanizing and racist.”"

Many more examples can be provided on request.
90 posted on 01/04/2004 10:08:02 PM PST by lonewacko_dot_com (http://lonewacko.com/blog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
An amnesty can make sense, if certain other actions are taken first.

Other actions:

  1. Pitch the Constitution in the trash.
  2. Rename country "North American Central Zone"
  3. Flag redesign and "Zone" anthem contests
  4. Public relations media campaign describing latin-american-style corruption and chaos as "diversities to be celebrated"
  5. Prepare for permanent Democratic Party majority as Dem-voting hispanic numbers skyrocket (check out TX in the 2000 county-by-county election map).
  6. Kiss remaining decent public school districts goodbye.

91 posted on 01/04/2004 10:13:22 PM PST by dagnabbit (Suport Amnesty 2007 ! For illegals arriving after Bush's 04 amnesty. It's never too early to care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
RE: Our population is aging, etc.

Very, very well stated -- and points up exactly IMO the problem in this whole issue.

Honesty.

This "migration" is not just happening. There is a reason, many reasons actually. My displeasure is not so much with the ILLEGALS (though letting it get out of hand angers me) -- it's with our ruling class of both Parties. They are not honest about this.

One reason for both Parties support is certainly concern for who is going to pay the taxes? I remember news of studies from both Parties that said the young would be paying more than 80 percent in taxes. Fat chance. So why can't the politicians come out and state frankly what you have said?

The other reasons are a bit uglier such as preventing revolution in Mexico, forced migration by a corrupt government, our businesses' insatiable appetite for cheap, docile labor, and more plus the small number of Aztlan nuts.

I don't think the W-P is trying to stir up anything, Dem rats would go even further that the President.

I would oppose any attempt to lessen the requirements of citizenship for those who choose to become Americans.

92 posted on 01/04/2004 10:21:26 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: dagnabbit
Thanks, best laugh I've had in a long time, though the hole in my chest wishes you hadn't.
93 posted on 01/04/2004 10:45:00 PM PST by JackelopeBreeder (Proud to be a loco gringo armed vigilante terrorist cucaracha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
" The point is that few here are asking themselves why all the suddenly the left (Washington Post) is so hot to trot on an issue that they seldom paid any attention to in the past?"

The WP article-(without any sources,just Republican "officials") was just a rehash of the Washington Times article a few weeks ago. But,what both articles had in common,was that nowhere in either article was there any mention of amnesty. Maybe one is required to wear special 3 D type glases to see the hidden messages about amnesty in the articles. This quote from Tom Ridge, from his Q&A, always gets overlooked in the white hot fever to accuse President Bush of granting amnesty to illegal aliens -

''I'm not saying make them citizens,'' Ridge said. ``They violated our laws to get here. You don't reward that kind of conduct.''

94 posted on 01/04/2004 11:26:20 PM PST by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Of course there are guidelines, and proof MUST be offered before qualifying for payment.

How do you proved you stold a Social Security number 30 years ago --- and what if 5 other guys are claiming that it was they who stold it -- not you? If 6 people get together and claimed each one worked only 2 years for a stolen Social Security number that was used illegally 12 years by only one --- how do you prove they didn't? If someone claims that they stold your Social Security number and it was really them working some of that time when it never really was stolen and only you used it --- that can't be proven ---- especially if you are a dead guy when this happens -- you won't be there to deny it.

There was massive fraud in the 80's amnesty ---- because the undocumented really have no proof.

95 posted on 01/04/2004 11:27:24 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: dagnabbit
LOL! Good one.
96 posted on 01/04/2004 11:29:21 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
I say they forfeited their claim when they made no effort to help keep the illegals out.

Facilitating a felony IS a felony, so facilitating this invasion should also have consequences.

At the least we must subtract the cost of pandering to, and incarcerating, the invaders from the potential funds.
If we do that Mex. will owe US billions!
97 posted on 01/04/2004 11:37:29 PM PST by Richard-SIA (Nuke the U.N!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
just like in Europe. There, they are repopulating themselves with Muslims,

The Muslims in Europe are there illegally?

98 posted on 01/04/2004 11:48:32 PM PST by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Americans overall want less legal immigration, yet, we are giving birth at way below the replacement rate, and killing a million fetuses yearly to boot.

I'm against abortion and all that -- but I don't think we're way below replacement rate --- I think we reached an equilibrium. We're the fastest growing country now by far in population growth --- because of immigration --- but do we need cities like Los Angeles, New york, Chicago, Houston growing rapidly? Do we need all our small towns turned into big cities?

High birth rates haven't helped some countries --- like Mexico for example and many of the African countries. It seems that China with it's one-child policy ---- that's way below replacement rate --- is the country that's pulling ahead the fastest.

99 posted on 01/04/2004 11:50:23 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
But,what both articles had in common,was that nowhere in either article was there any mention of amnesty. Maybe one is required to wear special 3 D type glases to see the hidden messages about amnesty in the articles.>>>>>>>

Don't know which 'Times 'article you refer to but in this W-P it looks like they *spin* amnesty into "mechanism". Any illegal that is allowed to remain in the USA & become *legal* (or *whatever* they're calling it that day) is receiving an amnesty. This also allows then to *legally* line-jump ahead of those waiting to imm. here legally.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A52647-2004Jan3.html

(from W-P article)"It also includes a mechanism for some undocumented residents to continue working in the United States and get on a path to legal status."
100 posted on 01/04/2004 11:50:58 PM PST by txdoda ("Navy-brat")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-233 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson