Black Conservatives need to ensure a complete defeat Democrats

myself ^ | 01 January 2004 | trueblackman

[Trueblackman]

Black Conservatives need to start banding together in this new year to with a winnable game plan that will ensure the complete defeat of the Democrat Party.

The year 2004 is a banner year for black conservatives as it has been ten years since the Republican Revolution, but not to be overlooked by any means it has been ten years since the worst ethnic cleansing since World War 2 was allowed to happen.

Most black conservatives have never held the Congressional Black (Democrat) Caucus responsible for the part it played in the needless deaths of nearly one million of our closest brothers and sisters in the nation of Rwanda in the winter of 1994.

The Congressional Black (Democrat) Caucus simply stood idly by as a Democrat Congress and President refused to deploy troops to help our brothers and sisters and would not even allow the incident to be classified as ethnic cleansing on the fear that public outcry would force their hand.

Black Conservatives, now have the moral duty and high ground to ensure that our Black Democrat/Liberal Counterparts and their Presidential Nominee, who they have endorsed is completely defeated in this election some 10 years later.

The defeat of selected members of the Congressional Black (Democrat) Caucus is also a must, since they are nothing more than a bunch of “stepping and fetching” socialists and the bought and paid for blackened sock puppets of the Democrat Party.

Never has this group of complete sellouts stood up for blacks in America or has never held members of their party responsible for their treatment and general racism towards blacks.

The Congressional Black (Democrat) Caucus allows themselves to be paraded across the political stage of American Liberal Politics, while parroting whatever dribble that the party’s all white leadership pours into their heads and the money they stick in their back pockets.

The Congressional Black (Democrat) Caucus has always been given the illusion of influence and power with in the Democrat Party, just like the NAACP Rainbow/Push and the whole host of other so-called black activists have in the past.

The nation of Rwanda found out how much influence and power that this groups of “porch monkeys” had when not one American/NATO/United Nations Peacekeeper arrived in the 100 days of ethnic cleansing as they did in Bosnia and Kosovo years later.

Black Conservatives must end the reign of terror of these con artists, sellouts and porch monkeys in our community since it has been our community worldwide that has suffered under the banner of phony liberation, pan-Africanism and social strife.

Black Conservatives have stood by and allowed these fools to scapegoat us as the reason, why the black community has failed to obtain equal footing in America. When it is they who are suppose to be the quote unquote black leaders in America and worldwide.

Black Conservatives have a duty in 2004 to see that the foreign policy of Bill Clinton’s Democrat Party and the United Nations shall never arise to see the light of day again, since it would be a blood sun if it were allowed to once more with a Democrat Presidential Nominee elected to the presidency.

You don’t have to take my opinion for it just as any Rwandan teenager, who lost both his/her parents and arms for their opinion on the influence of Black Liberal Democrats.

[Trueblackman]

Your opinions on this rough of an Op-Ed Piece

[Luke Skyfreeper]

I don't even have to read it. I approve of anything you write.

How's that? 8-)

[CWOJackson]

Personally, I would take the word Conservative out for two reasons.

1) The word Conservative will cause a lot of black people to NOT read the article and also be used to try and disqualify it, and

2) this should be a concern for all blacks.

Myself, I would outline the issues, problems and failures of the Democrats, then offer the alternatives.

[goodnesswins]

I agree with CWO about removing "conservative." Also, I know this is a "ROUGH" draft, but I'm wondering if you are going to link some of the one sentence paragraphs together. And, in addition, you might want to mention where else in the world Blacks might live better. Just my 2 cents.

Good job. Looking forward to the final product.

[Right_Handed_Writer]

Another Op-Ed that shares your viewpoint, I believe.

http://www.deanesmay.com/archives/000132.html

[Tailback]

My opinion is that if I ever said some of these words to a black person I'd get my butt kicked. Maybe you could mention that the CBC was never given any real power seats within the DNC. In other words, play up the fact that the DNC, while counting on an overwhelming majority of Black Americans to vote for them, don't let them partake in the political power structure of the Democrat party.

[farmfriend]

Kevin, Carry_Okie is working on some stuff that would really help in this endeavor.

[farmfriend]

ping

[marron]

Separate issue, but I always think of Rwanda whenever anyone demands that the UN be placed in charge of Iraq, or when they demand the internationalization of the force there.

The UN was on the ground in Rwanda, and essentially threw down their guns and left in a panic. I read an interview with a Norwegian peacekeeper who was undergoing psychiatric therapy as a result of what he witnessed there, rapes and ax-murders so close that his uniform was sprinkled with the blood, and him with a full magazine and no orders to intervene, so what was he to do...

It makes me ill, of course.

Saw an interview with the Canadian general who commanded the UN force there, he claims he reported what was about to happen and asked permission to move, to seize weapons caches and arrest militia members but was denied permission by Kofi Annan who was his direct superior at the time... He also is haunted by what he witnessed there, he couldn't get through the interview without tears rolling down his face, but the fact remains that he was there, with armed troops, and did nothing.

The UN is in the Congo, where a few French and Uruguayan troops huddle in their encampments through each long night while the slaughters go on right outside their fence line, and then go out at day-break to count the dead. Its disgusting.

[OldFriend]

Did you know that Rwanda was in Wesley Clark's purview?

Said they talked about it but made no decision on what if any action ought to be taken.

To say nothing of the UN standing idly by while africans are starved, slaughtered, sold, and bartered.

And yet, American blacks appear to subscribe to the idea that the UN ought to be deciding how we provide national security for America.

[WFTR]

The only issue that you really raise in this commentary is Rwanda, and I just can't see Rwanda as a great rallying point for either American blacks or conservatives.

As a conservative, I don't support intervention around the world when there is no American interest at stake. In Iraq, we are fighting Muslim terrorism and jihad. Defeating these enemies is a legitimate national interest. In Kosovo, we not only didn't have an interest, but our interest should have been with the other side. The KLA (the Albanians) was an ally of Al Qaeda. While we didn't know all that Al Qaeda would do at that time, we shouldn't have been supporting Muslim terrorists. I'm more sympathetic to the Croats and Muslims in Bosnia, but we had no interest there. We shouldn't have been involved.

I'm not black, so I can't say how blacks really feel about Rwanda. However, I suspect that most of them have no interest in tribal conflicts anywhere in Africa. They may use an interest in Africa as a rhetorical ploy, but I don't see any evidence that a connection with Africans is really a part of their daily sense of well-being. If one party campaigns on making things better for people in Africa and the other party campaigns on maintaining policies that give them advantages in the job market over here, most will vote for the party that maintains their job market advantages. I'm not criticizing this attitude except for when someone postures about Africa hypocritically. I'm just saying that I don't see Rwanda as an issue that will change many votes. I don't know whether you can use the Rwanda issue to show the hypocrisy of those who use Africa for rhetoric but don't really care. However, I think you'd need more examples to make that case in this commentary.

Resolving for 2004
Bill

[FormerACLUmember]

Most black conservatives have never held the Congressional Black (Democrat) Caucus responsible for the part it played in the needless deaths of nearly one million of our closest brothers and sisters in the nation of Rwanda in the winter of 1994.

Or their silence about slavery of blacks by muslims thoughout the islamofascist world.

Or the deaths of 12 million blacks by abortion since 1973 (40% of all abortions)

[Polybius]

The Congressional Black (Democrat) Caucus allows themselves to be paraded across the political stage of American Liberal Politics, while parroting whatever dribble that the party’s all white leadership pours into their heads....

Don't forget how Black Democrat Congressmembers allow themselves to be paraded around the Cuban Communist political stage by Fidel Castro while not even realizing that the Cuban Communist Party leadership is almost all lilly-white.

Official Cuba might as well have a sign on the doors of power saying “Whites Only.”

[whereasandsoforth]

We disagree on one issue. I do not believe the Black caucus is a puppet of White democrats. This group of Black folks know exactly what they are doing. In fact, I would not be surpised to find out they pull a few strings that make the White folk dance.

It is gratifying to see that we have come to a day in America when Blacks and Whites can be equally evil in their desires and their means to the end.

[marron]

Bush senior and Colin Powell of course resisted pressure to intervene in Bosnia, and I always believed that their decision to intervene in Somalia was in part to deflect criticism from the Saudis and other arabs for this refusal. The drumbeat from the middle east at the time was that America only cares about muslims with oil... and presto, the marines landed in Mogadishu.

The initial landing was massive, and instantly pacified the country allowing the humanitarian agencies to operate there in safety.

Clinton entered office and immediately shifted the focus back to Bosnia. He had little interest in Somalia and the results are what they are. I actually don't disagree with the final decision to put the US Army in Bosnia, though, the UN's management of it was shockingly incompetent, they were merely providing the various factions with blue-hatted hostages and blue-hatted witnesses to slaughter, rather than actually doing anything to stop it.

The killing stopped the day the US rolled in, and I don't think we should apologize for that.

The situation in Kosovo was similar, again the UN was hopeless and pulled its people the moment there was a threat to their safety. We then fought a war in which our planes killed as many refugees as the Serbs did, and delivered a safe haven to Europe's premier heroin dealers. I don't think we can be nearly as proud of our performance in Kosovo where the killing has yet to stop.

But the worst humanitarian disasters in the world go on every day in Africa. I would love to see us develop some kind of a plan to help, the current helps are not very effective. The British finally landed in Sierra Leone to try and stop the slaughter there, we organized an all-African force to land in Liberia to stop the killing there.

The situation in the Congo is out of control, where a fictional country called "Congo" is being eaten by its neighbors. Whatever results may eventually be more viable than what was before but millions are dying in the meantime and the current UN force there does nothing more than provide some non-African witnesses to a tiny slice of the whole while doing nothing at all to stop it.

It may be that in the end there is nothing to be done, Africans are the ones acting there and their fellow Africans are the victims. The Congo is a country the size of western Europe with few paved roads, so unless the West is prepared to land a considerable force, there isn't much they will be able to do except wait until the killing is over.

That wasn't the case in Rwanda, a much smaller country, whose militia were trained and armed by the French, and where the killing might have been stopped had a slightly more pro-active cowboy been the UN commander on the ground, rather than a Canadian. But we will never know. In the end, people are responsible for what they themselves do, and if this means that we get to throw stones at the feckless UN peacekeeping organization, and the French who profiteered from misery, it also means that Hutu are responsible for Hutu killings, and Congolese and Zimbabwean and Ugandan militaries and warlords are responsible for what they do.

This is a subject that will be trivialized if it becomes hostage to US racial politics. It is too important for that. It merits a reasoned and realistic and pragmatic discussion, by interested and disinterested parties who are prepared to act, and this has yet to happen.

I don't claim to have a solution, by the way.

[lainde]

bttt

[JLAGRAYFOX]

You are right on! I pray for the day when American Blacks stop being held in socialist economic slavery by the Democrat Party and they fully and finally assimilate themselves in the the general American society. I want American Blacks to have the same opportunites and be treated equally as all Americans should and must be. Their misguided loyalty to the Democrat Party and their so called Black leaders has kept them in a bondage worse than chattel slavery. Please take a walk around south Dallas (Martin Luther King Boulevard, to begin with) and tell me with a straight face that fifty years of undying loyalty to the Democrat Party has bettered their lot one iota. I am so happy that real progress is being made by thousands and thousands of Blacks that are now fully assmilated and accepted in USA society. That is their God given and birthright as free Americans. I only wish all Blacks would come to recognize the hosing they have suffered at the hands of the Democrat Party. I ask only one question. How many high paying jobs has Bill Clinton brought into Harlem, NY? Answer: Zero! End of story!

[Saundra Duffy]

since they are nothing more than a bunch of “stepping and fetching” socialists and the bought and paid for blackened sock puppets of the Democrat Party.

L I B . . . M R Ducks

[bert]

It is framed as a black foreign policy piece with overtones of domestic involvement and responsibility within the Black power structure. It's ok among friends. For broader publication, lighten up on the name calling.

"the whole host of other so-called black activists have in the past."

What part do black churches play in supporting and endorsing the Democrat party agenda? Are churches and individual pastors and deacons a political force? Is Reverend a religious or a political title?

[FITZ]

I don't support intervention around the world when there is no American interest at stake.

I think the way Reagan did it in Latin America was right --- supply arms to the good side, insist they have elections. There is an American interest in having more stability in the world and less Communism being spread. In Africa when there is a Christian and more progressive people being wiped out, we should send them arms and weapons to defend themselves.