Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why They Fear Us
The Rational Argumentator ^ | December 26, 2003 | Henry Emrich

Posted on 12/30/2003 10:29:35 AM PST by G. Stolyarov II

One of the most vexing problems that I have encountered in my experiences with Objectivism, is the fact that many people seem deathly afraid of our viewpoint – EVEN people with whom we should have most in common. They just don't seem to be able to understand it, even if we explain it patiently and calmly. Everything we say gets systematically distorted into something horrible. This used to bother me quite a lot, and still does to some degree. But I have come to a conclusion after a VERY long time thinking about it:

When people misunderstand what Objectivism is, and the things for which we stand, many of them are simply ignorant, NOT willfully antagonistic.

Take, for example, a situation that will doubtless be VERY common to most Objectivists: the issue of religion, and atheism. Whenever I would make statements to the effect that I didn't (and still don't), believe the Judeo-Christian mythology, everybody would go into emotional meltdown: their powers of reason would mysteriously disappear.

You can't really blame them, however. Most "Believers" (in whatever religion), simply don't understand, or think about, their religion very deeply. They are "religious" enough that atheism makes them nervous, but actually have very little understanding of the Bible, Koran, or whatever "holy book" they believe.

Most people don't really understand what Christianity means by "God". They have no idea that the concept makes no sense, as their religion teaches it. To them, "God" is somewhere between Santa Claus and Uncle Sam – a benevolent, strong, heroic Father figure "in the sky". Most of them have only a vague notion of heaven, and no interest in hell whatsoever.

When confronted with the works of Thomas Paine, Robert G. Ingersoll, or Ayn Rand, they honestly do not understand how those critiques of religion could apply to them. And can you REALLY blame them? After all, as we all know, most of the Christian Clergy THEMSELVES don't know half of how bloody and evil parts of the Bible are.

Most "Christians" in this country (and others) couldn't care less about the bible. The only parts of it they know halfway clearly are the "Christmas story", and the Easter thing. They understand the "ten commandments" in a very rudimentary, common sense way. They don't CARE that the "thou shalt not steal" thing is an injunction against stealing your neighbor's SLAVE. Most people honestly have no idea what the bible actually says, or what Christianity actually teaches.

They get terrified by "secular humanism" or "Godless atheists" because pretty much the only exposure to such things has been from socialists, communists, and suchlike. Hell, how do you think the destroyers of the United States were able to hoodwink people into putting "Under god" in the pledge of allegiance, in the first place? The sales-pitch was to make us different from the "Godless Commies". In the popular mind (controlled and shaped as it is by the "activists" and their social agendas), the concepts of Communism and Atheism were skillfully and secretly blended, so that the Common man can no longer tell one from the other.

This is part of what makes Conservatives useless, as I said. Most of them have no idea what their Bible teaches; nor will they listen. More often than not, when they DO find out, they get every bit as disgusted as we do, and worse: you ever wonder where all those preachy "born-again atheist" sites come from?

Same thing with capitalism: what most people in this culture mistakenly think of as capitalism is the lukewarm, state-entangled version: government-backed monopolies, licensing, franchises, tariffs, etc. Most of these people have never tried (as I have), to start a business, or create their own wealth. They've all bought into the mediocrity-mentality that says the only way to make it is as somebody else's "employee". The Entrepreneurial spirit is mostly dead in them, and they see "their jobs" as nothing more than a means to continue subsisting at the same mediocre level.

Reason? Too hard. Easier to watch TV, and give a half-hearted appearance of a religion you don't understand, every Sunday.

Purpose? Work, sleep, watch TV, breed the next generation of slaves, and die in a pool of your own urine.

They haven't learned any better. The government-controlled schools specialize in killing off every trace of the heroic impulse. Generations of potential Howard Roarks are systematically processed into docile, conformist Keatings, by schools, families, and 'peer pressure'.

But ask yourself: having never had self-made goals, how can they be expected to be creatures of "self-made soul?"

It's actually rather heartbreaking, to consider the masses of living zombies lock-stepping through life, their only goal to keep up with the Joneses, afraid to stand taller than the crowd because "what will the neighbors think." It's horrifying.

These poor fools equate "Altruism" with goodheartedness, human warmth, and private charity. They've probably never read Comte, Bismarck, Hegel, or Marx, and barely even heard their names.

So what's the answer?

PATIENCE. Those of us who know a better way MUST stand for it, and MUST reach out to them. Otherwise, this entire world is as good as dead.

So "professional philosophers" don't take Objectivism or Rand very seriously? Screw 'em. It's not ABOUT winning over Academia, in the long run. It's about reclaiming the Human Spirit from its destroyers, and getting people do understand that they DO have a right to exist, and they DO have a right to resist their Masters. We are a slave rebellion, friends: an "Underground railroad" of the Human Spirit.

Academia is a joke. Most so-called "philosophers" have deteriorated into gibbering wordplay, or convinced themselves they don't even exist. To think we're actually going to make headway there is wishful thinking at least, and suicidal at most.

The philosophical gangrene set in several centuries ago. We must ask ourselves: do we have 200 years to wait? Can we afford to let the wheels of history turn, and hope against all evidence that that the inhabitants of that time will still even be recognizably human in spirit and mind?

No. We don't have the time for that.

Even a cursory examination of history will reveal a pivotal fact; namely, that "paradigm shifts" – massive changes of gestalt thinking NEVER originate from WITHIN the old paradigm. In other words, history supports Miss Rand's premise that the "Mavericks" – the Roarks and Galts of the world – are the Atlas's who make the world turn.

So do not despair, friends. We must take up the torch, fight for all that is good and genuine and beautiful and true, and NEVER submit. "Second Renaissance" is eminently appropriate for an Objectivist bookstore's name, but it is ALSO – MUST be – our credo.

WE, and those of like mind, must be the heralds of a "new birth of freedom".

There's no other choice.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: altruism; aynrand; bible; bigotry; clergy; egoism; ignorance; objectivism; rand; reason; religion; routine; tradition; verbosity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-284 next last
Henry Emrich is a writer for SoloHQ and a contributor to The Rational Argumentator.
1 posted on 12/30/2003 10:29:35 AM PST by G. Stolyarov II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: G. Stolyarov II
Visit TRA's Yahoo! Group, the newest means of notification and communication for our subscribers. You can find it at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rationalargumentator

You can sign up by sending an e-mail to rationalargumentator-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

View all of the ardently rational material that TRA has to offer at its new Master Index at http://www.geocities.com/rationalargumentator/masterindex.html
2 posted on 12/30/2003 10:31:05 AM PST by G. Stolyarov II (http://www.geocities.com/rationalargumentator/index19.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G. Stolyarov II
Visit TRA's Yahoo! Group, the newest means of notification and communication for our subscribers. You can find it at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rationalargumentator

You can sign up by sending an e-mail to rationalargumentator-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

View all of the ardently rational material that TRA has to offer at its new Master Index at http://www.geocities.com/rationalargumentator/masterindex.html
3 posted on 12/30/2003 10:31:18 AM PST by G. Stolyarov II (http://www.geocities.com/rationalargumentator/index19.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G. Stolyarov II
" Most "Believers" (in whatever religion), simply don't understand, or think about, their religion very deeply."

This is the arrogant conceit of the Objectivists. This is THEIR belief. It's not true.

4 posted on 12/30/2003 10:31:39 AM PST by sauropod (Excellence in Shameless Self-Promotion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
"This is the arrogant conceit of the Objectivists. This is THEIR belief. It's not true."

Not true, why, Mr. Sauropod? An Objectivist will always provide his reasoning in discourse. Can you likewise furnish yours?
5 posted on 12/30/2003 10:33:17 AM PST by G. Stolyarov II (http://www.geocities.com/rationalargumentator/index19.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: G. Stolyarov II; hellinahandcart; Bobby777; DittoJed2; Thinkin' Gal; sheltonmac; Carry_Okie; ...
"They don't CARE that the "thou shalt not steal" thing is an injunction against stealing your neighbor's SLAVE. Most people honestly have no idea what the bible actually says, or what Christianity actually teaches."

Excuse me? What bible is this guy reading?

6 posted on 12/30/2003 10:33:30 AM PST by sauropod (Excellence in Shameless Self-Promotion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G. Stolyarov II
Absolutely.

It's not up to me to disprove an obvious lie.

7 posted on 12/30/2003 10:34:23 AM PST by sauropod (Excellence in Shameless Self-Promotion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: G. Stolyarov II
Most people don't really understand what Christianity means by "God". They have no idea that the concept makes no sense, as their religion teaches it.

I didn't get very far past this statement since it's obvious that Henry doesn't really know what Christianity teaches about G-d.

Speaking for myself, I know full well how bloody the Bible is, but the evil in it does not come from G-d. Mostly, it comes from man. And it is hard to match the evil done by atheistic men (which is not to say that theistic men haven't tried).

Shalom.

8 posted on 12/30/2003 10:35:28 AM PST by ArGee (Scientific reasoning makes it easier to support gross immorality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G. Stolyarov II
An Objectivist will always provide his reasoning in discourse

Your statement is demonstably false. In the posted article, the author arrogantly states that most Believers do not understand, or even think about their religion. Does he provide his reasoning? Facts? Statistics? Anything? No. He just states his opinion in an obnoxious manner. Try this one:

Most Objectivists do not understand the philosophy of Ayn Rand. Does this statement bother you?

9 posted on 12/30/2003 10:37:57 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (France delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ArGee; G. Stolyarov II
Further, the writer makes the assumption that us conservatives are not familiar with the objectivist analysis of altruism and the like.

I am. I read Peikoff's Ominous Parallels cover to cover and in general agreed with his analysis (in spite of his blindness when it comes to Christianity.).

10 posted on 12/30/2003 10:38:19 AM PST by sauropod (Excellence in Shameless Self-Promotion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Correctamundo.
11 posted on 12/30/2003 10:39:30 AM PST by sauropod (Excellence in Shameless Self-Promotion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: G. Stolyarov II
Interesting article. Going to check out the links you cited.
12 posted on 12/30/2003 10:39:58 AM PST by stanz (Those who don't believe in evolution should go jump off the flat edge of the Earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: G. Stolyarov II
Why They Fear Us
The Objectivists are now taking the 'phobe" page from the GLBT handbook? Ayn would be so proud ...
14 posted on 12/30/2003 10:40:21 AM PST by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastsider
GLBT?
15 posted on 12/30/2003 10:41:50 AM PST by cport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: G. Stolyarov II
We are a slave rebellion, friends: an "Underground railroad" of the Human Spirit.

This is good, you, like Ayn Rand, at least admit to the existence of a "Human Spirit". That Spirit is Real, It is conscious part of yourself, what Rand would call the "ego". This "spirit" is God's gift to us, it has a free will and a capacity for joy. Learn to listen to it. In the end, it is truly the one thing that no other Human can take from you.

16 posted on 12/30/2003 10:42:31 AM PST by morque2001 (Life is a trajedy for those who feel, and a comedy for those who think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G. Stolyarov II
The article says, "Those of us who know a better way MUST stand for it, and MUST reach out to them."

But all I see is a series of insults.

17 posted on 12/30/2003 10:42:51 AM PST by possible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
I think the entire article is written to support two theses, 1) that the Believers do not understand Objectivism, 2) that the big government advocates do not understand it. Mr. Emrich uses the remainder of the text as evidence to support his assertion via reference to general attitudinal trends among persons of either a Christian or a statist persuasion when approached with Objectivist ideas.

He is verifying his statements, if you examine the whole text of the work rather than just focus on the thesis snippets.
18 posted on 12/30/2003 10:43:21 AM PST by G. Stolyarov II (http://www.geocities.com/rationalargumentator/index19.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cport
G[ay]L[esbian]B[isexual]T[ransgender]
19 posted on 12/30/2003 10:43:53 AM PST by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: eastsider
Thank you. I figured it was somewhere along those lines...
20 posted on 12/30/2003 10:44:58 AM PST by cport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-284 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson