Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ArGee; G. Stolyarov II
Further, the writer makes the assumption that us conservatives are not familiar with the objectivist analysis of altruism and the like.

I am. I read Peikoff's Ominous Parallels cover to cover and in general agreed with his analysis (in spite of his blindness when it comes to Christianity.).

10 posted on 12/30/2003 10:38:19 AM PST by sauropod (Excellence in Shameless Self-Promotion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: sauropod
I am.

Good for you.

For myself, I tried to understand Richard Dawkins. I could not get through 3 chapters of The Blind Watchmaker without coming to the conclusion that he had proven the precise opposite of what he was attempting to prove. So I put the book down.

We all interpret the world according to our prejudices. What I often find about "objectivists" (I won't say it's true of all) is they don't admit there prejudices.

I freely admit mine. I know G-d knows more than I do and I trust to His opinions.

Shalom.

27 posted on 12/30/2003 10:50:03 AM PST by ArGee (Scientific reasoning makes it easier to support gross immorality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson