Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The end of 'Christianity lite' is near
Edmonton Sun ^ | December 21, 2003 | TED BYFIELD

Posted on 12/21/2003 3:46:23 PM PST by nickcarraway

Forgive me for playing prophet, but I think this will be the last Christmas of the 20th century. Yes, I know that the 20th century actually ended a few years ago, but I'm thinking of it as an era. This Christmas a certain era will end.

Call it the era of Christianity lite. Much popular religion of the century descended into mere feel-goodism. Gone was all serious reference to sin, repentance, suffering, atonement, evil, anything unpleasant.

God was in heaven and all was rosy. Say your prayers, try not to hurt anybody, never be "judgmental," and everything will come out right. Business will go well. The kids will behave. You'll never get sick. You'll acquire lots of "stuff." The Father in heaven became a Grandfather in heaven.

Christmas was similarly sterilized. When we were given anything beyond Santa Claus, coloured lights and canned carols, we might actually see a baby, a manger or a star. But Herod's massacre of the children in Bethlehem was certainly never mentioned, nor the dire warning to Mary: "A sword will pierce your soul also" (Luke 2:35).

It was rarely acknowledged that all this unrelieved sweetness and light was much at odds with the Christianity of the New Testament or the actual experience of Christians through much of their history or what ordinarily happens to us ordinary people. Business did not always go well, kids did not always behave, people did in fact get sick (and died, too) and along with all the "stuff" came credit card bills that are now, we're told, astronomical. So 20th century people gradually slipped away from the churches on the sufficient grounds that what they were saying seemed utterly unreal. Such was the era of Christianity lite.

There is convincing evidence now, however, that the era is over, and that the 21st century will see some fundamental changes. I don't mean a massive return to the church, but rather a massive turn of the churches away from Christianity lite.

The after-effect of 9-11 has been a general decline in the credibility of what's called "post-modernism," the belief there are no such things as moral truths. You have your moral truths, I have mine and no version whatever can claim to be really true. This means that the people who deliberately murdered 3,000 innocent civilians had just as good a claim to be right as those who thought otherwise. Nobody, apart perhaps from professors of "ethics," can swallow that line any more, and this has thrown the whole post-modern phenomenon into doubt.

The continuing probability of terror, wrought in the name of an Islamic God, will spur more and more thought about who or what God actually is.

A "spiritual" awakening is going on. According to a recent cover story in Time, Canadians are flocking into prayer groups that meet outside of churches, though they're often sponsored by churches. Such a ferment has preceded every major religious revival. They begin as strictly non-institutional, but they rarely remain that way. Genuine "spirituality" makes people want to do things for God. So corporate action follows and some sort of institution becomes necessary. "Spirituality," in other words invariably turns into "religion."

This may sound extreme, but I think it will happen. Mel Gibson's movie, The Passion, will prove to be the most attended Hollywood movie ever made. (This excludes, of course, the Campus Crusade movie Jesus which is already and by far the most attended movie ever made, but it is not usually considered a Hollywood product.)

The Gibson production is emphatically not Christianity Lite. It portrays the crucifixion for what it was, "a bloody, dusty, sweaty and sordid business." That is, it follows the New Testament account. Never has a movie received so much advance attention - an 18-page review in the New Yorker, columns in every major American newspaper, sophisticated Washington crowds openly weeping. It will hit very hard.

So consider this the last Merry Christmas in the age of Christianity lite. The new century will see a new Christianity which in fact is the old one. And a very different Christmas. Less sugary, but far more real. And it's about time.


TOPICS: Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: New York
KEYWORDS: campuscrusade; canada; catholiclist; christian; christianity; christianitylite; christmas; melgibson; religion; revival; secularism; september12era; society
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-209 next last
To: Brandybux
Who or what is Scofield?

Read this:
Scofield's Bible exists for one basic purpose

21 posted on 12/21/2003 4:43:18 PM PST by A. Pole (pay no attention to the man behind the curtain , the hand of free market must be invisible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: Brandybux
Who or what is Scofield?

And this: Seven Age Dispensationalism

23 posted on 12/21/2003 4:45:39 PM PST by A. Pole (pay no attention to the man behind the curtain , the hand of free market must be invisible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Interesting article. Thanks for posting.

I was thinking just the same thing the other day, for some reason: that the time of sitting on the fence is over, and that many Christians are going to have seriously ask themselves what it is that they really believe. (Starting with some in the hierarchy, I hope!)
24 posted on 12/21/2003 4:46:41 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Gamecock; CCWoody; Dr Warmoose; OrthodoxPresbyterian; ...
So Ricky warren wants to play with the big boys? Bad idea that! For the record, my pastor finds Warren shallow at best, heretical at worst. Could you get some confirming links? I know a pastor who would be very interested! Warren sounds more and more like a cult leader every day!
25 posted on 12/21/2003 4:55:26 PM PST by CARepubGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: livius
You may want to read this excerpt about Scofield Scofield: The Man Behind the Myth
26 posted on 12/21/2003 4:55:32 PM PST by Zipporah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CARepubGal; P-Marlowe
Some of our friends will disagree with the premise of this article.


27 posted on 12/21/2003 5:00:01 PM PST by Gamecock (Day 2 of the Pope Piel Death Watch....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: CARepubGal
Oh great. An excellent article about a timely subject requiring deep introspection about the Gospel of Jesus Christ and the last days Church becomes a if-you-don't-agree-with-my-pastor-you-must-be-a-cult bash-a-thon.

Geez. The devil has to do very little of his dirty work.
29 posted on 12/21/2003 5:22:00 PM PST by Skooz (If everyone knew everything about everyone, no one would have anything to do with anyone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
I find Ricky Warren shallow, superficial and more like Jim Bakker or Swaggart. Sorry bub! Saddleback is a cute trend and his "let's all be just like me" game is somewhat cultish. But YOU are sooooo much more "spiritual" since you paid the $$ and bought the horrid book! :)
30 posted on 12/21/2003 5:25:50 PM PST by CARepubGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
See Post 29. The screaming beginneth! Incidentally Warren hates denominations. Some one else felt that way too! Guess who it was?
31 posted on 12/21/2003 5:27:22 PM PST by CARepubGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The middle ground is dissapearing. Churches that try to stay 'Chrsitian-lite' are being pulled off the fence, mostly towards the radical homosexual activist side. As someone much wiser than I said, no man can serve two masters.
32 posted on 12/21/2003 5:28:53 PM PST by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CARepubGal
I haven't read the book. And there's no need to be smug and condescending. I just find it distressing that Christians tend to bash one another so incessantly over a jot or tittle of doctrine when much of what we believe (NOT the basic tenants of faith, but the more or less extraneous volume of denominational doctrine) is subjective.

It's much easier to construct our Byzantine maze of pharisitical "thou shalt not believe XYZ" than to love one another with Christ's love, as He commanded.
33 posted on 12/21/2003 5:31:49 PM PST by Skooz (If everyone knew everything about everyone, no one would have anything to do with anyone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
Man, do you sound like a guy with an axe to grind! :)

(Perhaps rightfully so).

I go to a church influenced by the Willow Creek Syndrome and have done a bit of research into it's origins - perhaps you could pass on some of the info you've found.
34 posted on 12/21/2003 5:36:17 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Skooz; Gamecock
What besides the "happy verses" do you believe then? Having learned about that kind of Christianity then falling for a cult thanks to the improper teachings I received (in all fairness, the resources were not as accessable but still there was no meat taught to me and the cult sounded like another group o' Christians to my ignorant ears). Would you Christians that can say what they believe and why or cult fodder?
35 posted on 12/21/2003 5:36:30 PM PST by CARepubGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: CARepubGal
What besides the "happy verses" do you believe then?

The whole thing. All 66 books. The "happy verses" and the verses requiring repentence and subjection to the Word of God. All of it.

Would you Christians that can say what they believe and why or cult fodder?

You might have to re-write that sentence. I cannot understand it. :0)

36 posted on 12/21/2003 5:39:44 PM PST by Skooz (If everyone knew everything about everyone, no one would have anything to do with anyone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Rastifratz
Right here...

"Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off." Rom 11:22

The modern church wants to talk about the goodness of God but not the severity.
37 posted on 12/21/2003 5:39:46 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; anniegetyourgun; Canticle_of_Deborah; No More Gore Anymore
'"Spirituality," in other words invariably turns into "religion."'

That is the only statement with which I disagree in that article.

There is definitely a division taking place in this country.
God is separating His people from the chaff, but I'm not sure that translates into more religion, per se, just a desire to be closer to God through urgings of the Holy Spirit.

One of the hallmarks of this "Christianity Lite" was, and to a large extent still is, the belief that church is a social gathering place whereby mere presence and a ten percent tithe guarantees one a place in Heaven.

"They profess that they know God; but in works they deny Him." Tit 1:16.

God knows our hearts.
Our worship of Him on Sunday morning doesn't constitute our spirituality unless we follow that with His work.

"Ye shall know them by their fruits....." Mt 7:16.

I am thankful to the Holy Father for this time of choosing.
We must either be for Him or against Him.

"I know thy works, that thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot.
So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee from my mouth." Rev. 3: 15, 16.

38 posted on 12/21/2003 5:41:59 PM PST by TexasCowboy (COB1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
"I just find it distressing that Christians tend to bash one another so incessantly over a jot or tittle of doctrine "...

I wasn't bashing Christians.. it has to do with doctrine.. and when doctrine contridicts scripture...

39 posted on 12/21/2003 5:43:14 PM PST by Zipporah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
Your statement is correct, Christ did command us to love.

But He also commanded us...

"Take heed that no man deceive you." Matt 24:4

The Christian is under an obligation to follow ALL the teachings of Christ.
40 posted on 12/21/2003 5:44:55 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-209 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson