Skip to comments.
Army questioning soldiers' plan to armor vehicles
bayarea.com ^
| Thu, Dec. 18, 2003
| DAVID A. LIEB
Posted on 12/18/2003 2:45:55 PM PST by 11th_VA
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. - Fearing roadside bombs and sniper bullets, the members of the Army Reserves' 428th Transportation Co. turned to a local steel fabricator to fashion extra armor for their 5-ton trucks and Humvees before beginning their journey to Iraq earlier this month.
But their armor might not make it into the war, because the soldiers didn't get Pentagon approval for their homemade protection.
(Excerpt) Read more at bayarea.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: humvee; iraq; miltech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
I heard a story a few months ago about a machinest that made a 50 cal (?) cradle for his son's humvee, that gave 360 degrees line of fire. The Army bought dozens of 'em ...
1
posted on
12/18/2003 2:45:56 PM PST
by
11th_VA
To: 11th_VA
They screwed up by asking if they could do it. It's easier to get forgiveness than permission.
To: Britton J Wingfield
It's easier to get forgiveness than permission. How Cintonesque, but true ...
3
posted on
12/18/2003 2:55:01 PM PST
by
11th_VA
(If you can read this IN ENGLISH - Thank a Veteran !!!)
To: 11th_VA
sounds to me like good old american can do type of thing above and beyond the course that kina of thing is what has made america great
4
posted on
12/18/2003 2:55:45 PM PST
by
al baby
(Ice cream does not have bones)
To: 11th_VA
"Army questioning soldiers' plan to armor vehicles" I'm hoping that the Pentagon will take a close look at some of the ideas that these guys have, take the best of those ideas, standardize them and take this effort forward. The guys probably know the basics of what needs to be done better than anyone. Lives could be saved here.
5
posted on
12/18/2003 2:55:45 PM PST
by
davisfh
To: 11th_VA; af_vet_rr; ALOHA RONNIE; American in Israel; American Soldier; archy; armymarinemom; ...
6
posted on
12/18/2003 2:56:15 PM PST
by
archy
(Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
To: 11th_VA
This is exactly the kind of Military Rumsfield is trying to transform the Brass into. Quick, mobile and responsive to the changing face of the new war Terrorism. They should promote the person who approved this and demote everyone above them right up to the Pentagon.
7
posted on
12/18/2003 3:00:22 PM PST
by
pwatson
To: 11th_VA
I remember putting sandbags in the floors of our gun-jeeps on the DMZ and fabricating wire cut bars mounted on the front bumpers - the North Koreans used wires and mines effectively before the
Official Army caught up with the frontline troops counter measures.
The soldiers in the field are normally ahead of Washington with life-saving innovations...
Hope the troops can keep trying....
8
posted on
12/18/2003 3:03:06 PM PST
by
Van Jenerette
(U.S. Army Infantry OCS Hall of Fame, Ft. Benning)
To: 11th_VA
During the Civil War, U.S. Grant often gave armies, corps, divisions, units etc. general directions on goals and marveled at the imagination and skill of ordinary private soldiers in fashioning means from chaos.
In Europe in WWII it became apparent that Sherman tanks were really no match for the panzers. Tank units did lots of things to try for an edge. They welded their own armor plates on wherever they could. They ties tree trunks all around the tanks to make buffers. They did the same with sand bags. For the life of me, I can't imagine even General Patton finding fault with that.
When commanders stop allowing the flow of creative juices in their ranks, they will be crushing what may be the best secret weapon the US military has used since the days of George Washington in defeating the bad guys.
9
posted on
12/18/2003 3:04:13 PM PST
by
stevem
To: 11th_VA
This story almost brought tears to my eyes not because of the Army's recalcitrance (that Angered me), but because I joined the Marines shortly after Operation Frequent Wind in South Vietnam. The attitude from Civilians at that time towards us and the Military in General was pretty poor.
Having lived through that and now seeing this and the other examples of our Families and non-related Americans stepping up to the bat to try and help in whatever way they can....
God Bless you, God Bless all of you.. each and every one of you who has written a letter, sent a cookie or a piece of chocolate, made a phone call, sent an air conditioner, visited a Vets home, thanked a Vet on the street, visited a Vet in the hospital..or.. tried to help outfit vehicles with added armor protection.
The outpouring of help from American Citizens in this war, DESPITE their Governments attempts to dissuade them, to me is absolutely mind blowing.
Thank you America I salute you
Sempr Fi
10
posted on
12/18/2003 3:11:31 PM PST
by
Leatherneck_MT
(Those who do not accept peaceful change make a violent bloody revolution inevitable.)
To: davisfh
I wonder how long it's been since the fat, arrogant, desk-jocky stuffed-shirt martini-sucking beauraucrat who "forbids" this sort of field innovation has ventured into a Combat Zone?
These jerks who put their sacred "rules" and "SOPs" before the lives of our brave young men and women putting their lives on the line in a faraway, hostile environment just rub me contrary to the natural lie of my fur!
I wish someone would yank their corpulent, haughty, pansy lard tushies out from behind that nice comfy desk in that cozy air-conditioned office and plop it down spat in a Humvee having to make that run from Baghdad to Tikrit every day!
A lot of those candy-arsed two-bit tin-horn brass-plated dictators are long overdue for a reality familiarzation course, PRONTO, IMHO.
Back in Vietnam they used to pack hot asphalt between the door panels of the trucks and between plywood panels on the floors, let it solidify, and lower the seats like a "low-rider" hot-rod car. And I don't think they asked any washington beauraucrat's bloody permsission to do it, either!
Where are the Gun-Trucks in these convoys, anyway?
Anyone remember those? Another example of American GI innovation - and I don't think they had to bribe any fat cat in Washington for permission to rig those up, by the way.
Somebody in that Pentagon had best wake the heck up!
11
posted on
12/18/2003 3:12:35 PM PST
by
Uncle Jaque
("We need a Revival; Not a Revolution;... a Committment; Not a New Constitution..." -S. GREEN)
To: 11th_VA
A classic example of theory versus reality.
To: 11th_VA
This is an old practice. We're not the British.
What's next, making them get rid of their non-issue body armor?
13
posted on
12/18/2003 3:14:18 PM PST
by
Justa
(Politically Correct is morally wrong.)
To: 11th_VA
In Vietnam, I was in the Army Engineers. We armored the cabs of our trucks with 1/4 inch thick steel plate. We didn't tell the brass, and they didn't yell at us for doing so.
To: 11th_VA
The Army, which is still developing its own add-on armor kits for vehicles, doesn't typically allow any equipment that is not Army-tested-and-approved, Maj. Gary Tallman, a Pentagon spokesman
Before deployment it could be a problem. Added armor thats not in the books would play hell with the load plans for both air and sea movement. The traditional way to do this was to pack it separate as a bulk load in a couple containers. It can be assembled after reaching the zone that way they are far away from the bean counters and those concerned with their kickbacks.
15
posted on
12/18/2003 3:18:52 PM PST
by
R. Scott
(It is seldom that any liberty is lost all at once.)
To: stevem
Not to mention the "beaks" added to some Shermans to help them plow through the hedgerows in Normandy, or the attachments spot-welded to Jeeps in Germany to break the wires the Germans would string across roads to decapitate unwary drivers.
16
posted on
12/18/2003 3:21:01 PM PST
by
Colonel_Flagg
(For the one who knows.)
To: davisfh
I'm hoping that the Pentagon will take a close look at some of the ideas that these guys have, take the best of those ideas, standardize them and take this effort forward.
And of course theyll have to have a multi million dollar study, arrange the quid pro quo for after retirement from service, triple the cost as a minimum and add a lot of unnecessary high tech.
17
posted on
12/18/2003 3:21:40 PM PST
by
R. Scott
(It is seldom that any liberty is lost all at once.)
To: davisfh
I'm hoping that the Pentagon will take a close look at some of the ideas that these guys have, take the best of those ideas... A jury-rigged contraption attached to tanks, though up by an American G.I., helped deal with the hedgerows of Noramandy that had previously stopped American armor.
Rhino Tanks
18
posted on
12/18/2003 3:23:11 PM PST
by
Polybius
To: 11th_VA
To: stevem
For the life of me, I can't imagine even General Patton finding fault with that. He wouldn't. He was a big proponent of GI's making any necesary mods. He himself tried time and again to get the Army make numerous changes on the Sherman and later tanks to no avail.
20
posted on
12/18/2003 3:25:09 PM PST
by
PsyOp
(Note to Jihadists: I profile and carry a gun.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson