Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stevem
For the life of me, I can't imagine even General Patton finding fault with that.

He wouldn't. He was a big proponent of GI's making any necesary mods. He himself tried time and again to get the Army make numerous changes on the Sherman and later tanks to no avail.

20 posted on 12/18/2003 3:25:09 PM PST by PsyOp (Note to Jihadists: I profile and carry a gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: PsyOp
He wouldn't. He was a big proponent of GI's making any necesary mods. He himself tried time and again to get the Army make numerous changes on the Sherman and later tanks to no avail.

He was also a driving force behind the aquisition of the undergunned and underarmored Sherman because he preferred mobility. It meant his tankers suffered roughly 5 to 1 losses. Thank god we had the skies.

35 posted on 12/18/2003 5:25:52 PM PST by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: PsyOp; Steven
I can't imagine even General Patton finding fault ...

Heard Patton was the guy who slowed down deployment of the the Pershing Tank, which was available in 1943 and was more than a match for any German tank. He evidently was madly in love with the Sherman's speed.

Any truth detectors on this?

61 posted on 12/19/2003 8:48:26 AM PST by Kenny Bunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson