Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: An Open Message to the Republican Party Cheerleaders on this Forum...
12-10-03 | Vanity

Posted on 12/10/2003 7:39:21 PM PST by ambrose

Vanity:

An Open Message to the Republican Party Cheerleaders on this Forum...



TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 1sogo3rdpartyalready; ambrosethepitbull; assbrose; backstabbing; brainwashedgop; bushforpresident; bushisarino; bushisliberal; bushscotuscfr; callingrossperot; catsanddogs; cfr; chat; cratroll; daschlenotrepublican; deanbotsunite; dutroll; getoveryourself; gop; goplemmings; grumpyoldman; lessexclamationpkm; liberalrepublican; lies; mccain; mcclintocklost; omission; oughtabeinchat; paleossuck; peroutka2004; pompomgirlsunite; postfordean; purityordeath; republicans; rinosbetterthanrats; thirdpartieslose; thisischat; tombot; zotcandidate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 661-672 next last
To: oceanview
I wouldn't be surprised to see some artificial hearts go into one or two of the liberals.


First time they'd have hearts.....
101 posted on 12/10/2003 8:30:29 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
As a unified force we can achieve the electoral extinction of the democrat party as a political force. Once they are extinct, so to speak, we can have a factioning of the republican party into CONSERVATIVE parts. In other words, the "divisions" which presently exist will inevitably become more pronounced by the elimination of the democrats.

However, we have to have the first goal first.
102 posted on 12/10/2003 8:31:49 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
Amen.
103 posted on 12/10/2003 8:31:57 PM PST by Jim Robinson (All your ZOT are belong to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Yeah, that's it, we're all just liberal "Bush haters."

Just remember to march in line, and don't ask any questions.

Pop quiz: Conservative or Liberal?

- Largest increase in non-defense government spending in a generation.

- Largest increase in Medicare since its inception.

- Massively expanded the power of the federal government at the cost of the states (No Child Left Behind, PB Abortion Ban, and several other bills).

What's next from Bush? A guaranteed minimum income?
104 posted on 12/10/2003 8:31:59 PM PST by TheAngryClam (Don't blame me, I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518
The country is moving to the cat loving, bed weting left.

Hey, I resemble that remark!

Other than that, you are correct, of course, which is why we're ready to elect a Mommy President, and that makes Evita, in my pessimistic scenario, a virtual shoo-in, whenever she decides to run!

105 posted on 12/10/2003 8:32:31 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Merry Shopping Season and a Happy Pre-Christmas Storewide Sales Event!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
You were told that it was DOA in the Supreme Court too.
106 posted on 12/10/2003 8:32:34 PM PST by TheAngryClam (Don't blame me, I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
This isn't directed to you personally, but do you remember the Republican Primaries and how all of the conservatives were knocking McCain because of CFR and saying that Bush wouldn't do that and how Bush should win the nomination.....then he goes and signs it anyway. Are people not suppossed to say anything when a leader they elect lets them down with certain issues? The people elected him and so now he has to answer to them and he should. He needs to get out there and discuss these issues. That is what leaders are suppossed to do.
107 posted on 12/10/2003 8:32:37 PM PST by Born in a Rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Born in a Rage
That's why Howard Dean had his records sealed as Governor -- because he leans conservative. Give me a break!

You want this man in charge of our military? I cannot ignore his liberal social stance either -- glad you can!

Howard Dean would be a disaster for America -- just because he can spin with the best of them doesn't mean it is fact! He lies, he lies, and he lies!

From RNC Research on Howard Dean (BTW, every last comment is sourced):

DEAN SINKS TO NEW
LOW AT WMUR DEBATE
Dean Still Unable To Accept Responsibility For Spreading Baseless 9/11 Theory
____________________________________________________

DEAN RAISES “INTERESTING THEORY” ON NPR
BUT TONIGHT BLAMES IT ON FOX NEWS

Dean Denies Using Innuendo To Attack President Bush. WMUR’S SCOTT SPRADLING: “Governor Dean, you had once stated that you thought it was possible that the president of the United States had been forewarned about the 9/11 terrorist attacks. You later said that you didn't really know. A statement like that, don't you see the possibility of some Democrats being nervous about statements like that leading them to the conclusion that you are not right for being the next commander in chief?” HOWARD DEAN: “Well, in all due respect, I did not exactly state that. I was asked on Fox, fair and balanced news, that … I was asked why I thought the president was withholding information, I think it was, or 9/11 or something like that. And I said, well, the most interesting theory that I heard, which I did not believe, was that the Saudis had tipped him off.” (ABC News Democrat Candidate Debate, Durham, NH, 12/9/03)

Actually, Fox News Asked Dean About His Theory, Not About President Withholding Information. FOX NEWS’ CHRIS WALLACE: “The most interesting theory is that the president was warned ahead of time by the Saudis? Why would you say that governor?” DEAN: “Because there are people who believe that. We don’t know what happened in 9/11. …” WALLACE: “Do you believe that?” DEAN: “No, I don t believe that. I can’t imagine the President of the United States doing that, but we don’t know and it would be a nice thing to know.” (Howard Dean On Fox News’ “Sunday,” 12/7/03)

Dean Suggested His “Interesting Theory” On NPR. “The most interesting theory that I’ve heard so far – which is nothing more than a theory, I can’t think – it can’t be proved – is that [President Bush] was warned ahead of time [about the 9/11 attacks] by the Saudis.” (NPR’s “The Diane Rehm Show,” 12/1/03)

Washington Post Columnist Suggested Dean’s Comment Shows His Shift To “Nutty” Left. “Now, I cannot testify to Howard Dean’s sanity before this campaign, but five terms as governor by a man with no visible tics and no history of involuntary confinement is pretty good evidence of a normal mental status. When he avers, however, that ‘the most interesting’ theory as to why the president is ‘suppressing’ the Sept. 11 report is that Bush knew about Sept. 11 in advance, it’s time to check on thorazine supplies. When Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.) first broached this idea before the 2002 primary election, it was considered so nutty it helped make her former representative McKinney. Today the Democratic presidential front-runner professes agnosticism as to whether the president of the United States was tipped off about 9/11 by the Saudis, and it goes unnoticed. The virus is spreading.” (Charles Krauthammer, “The Delusional Dean,” The Washington Post, 12/5/03


108 posted on 12/10/2003 8:32:47 PM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- OU Sooners are #1in the BCS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

Dubya stuff

109 posted on 12/10/2003 8:33:10 PM PST by TaxRelief (Welcome to the only website dedicated to the sustenance of a free republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: deport
Pork everywhere now a days.... it seems.

110 posted on 12/10/2003 8:34:55 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
A round of Hil or Dean and more socialists in Congress are the only answer for reversing this new reality of the Liberal Republican Party within the next 10 years. I am sick of fighting. If we want more socialism, let's try it in earnest for a few years, and let the voters decide in 2008 if they want to keep it or elect conservatives.

If we follow this scenario,it's possible the voters won't decide a damn thing in 2008. Think ,man...
111 posted on 12/10/2003 8:35:55 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: TheAngryClam
Most people on both sides expected the 60-day rule to be thrown out but unlike you Sky is Falling crowd, they made contingencies. Or do you not remember that fact?

Your screen name fits you perfectly!

112 posted on 12/10/2003 8:36:07 PM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- OU Sooners are #1in the BCS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
That's an intriguing thought. Political candidates can skirt the CFR regulations by creating pornographic campaign ads. There's no way in hell the U.S. Supreme Court would restrict those ads -- especially if they are the most vile, homo-erotic ads you can imagine.
113 posted on 12/10/2003 8:36:26 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
whew!

I had to go update my profile and tagline.

Nice post #83, btw :-)

114 posted on 12/10/2003 8:36:49 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Want to help Support Our Troops .. For some ideas, check out my profile. Thanks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
If not for the war, they would never have gotten away with so much.
115 posted on 12/10/2003 8:37:04 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals (This is the 1st US election in which a global party (socialists) are trying to win a US election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
Thanks for posting the link -- much appreciated!
116 posted on 12/10/2003 8:37:08 PM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- OU Sooners are #1in the BCS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
It sure would be fun to see the threads leading up to the 2000 election.
117 posted on 12/10/2003 8:38:06 PM PST by Stew Padasso (Head down over a saddle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
So far you haven't addressed anything substantive that I've said, only decided to accuse myself and others on this thread of being part of some vast leftwing conspiracy out to get poor George W. Bush, the greatest conservative since Goldwater.

Gag.
118 posted on 12/10/2003 8:38:20 PM PST by TheAngryClam (Don't blame me, I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: TheAngryClam
I'd rather Dean won at this point.

News *FLASH*, pal: that makes you a *DEMOCRAT*. Why are you even *HERE*?

119 posted on 12/10/2003 8:38:35 PM PST by Sir Valentino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
No one ever promised us a rose garden, huh? ;-)
120 posted on 12/10/2003 8:38:57 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Want to help Support Our Troops .. For some ideas, check out my profile. Thanks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 661-672 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson