One of the best editorials I've ever read on FIP and terror. It is still very much relevant today.
1 posted on
12/08/2003 8:52:05 PM PST by
Indie
To: Indie
But that's what the Bush administration and Congress have asked of Americans -- to give up essential liberty for safety that's not even guaranteed. By not being fully appreciative of the fact that it's Washington, not Osama bin Laden, that represents the greatest threat to both liberty and security, we've gone along with the agenda. Where were all these Franklin-quoting Champions of Liberty when our Second Amendment rights were (and still are) being annihilated on the altar of "public safety"?
Try undoing the long-held anti-gun attacks on our Constitutional Right to Keep and Bear Arms before griping about TIP and the Patriot Act.
2 posted on
12/08/2003 8:55:55 PM PST by
Prime Choice
(Leftist opinions may be free, but I still feel like I'm getting ripped off every time I receive one.)
To: Indie
I'm not a member of America's sissified generation. The only nation keeping Israel from being wiped off the face of the earth? Is this author an ungreatful Democrat? Yes.
Exactly what "right" has this author lost? None, unless he's planning his own terrorist attack.
To: Indie
Benjamin Franklin warned, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." This remark of Franklin's is universally misconstrued. The occasion of his making it pertained to the powers of the nascent governing body of colonial Pennsylvania, not the civil liberties of the colonials. The governing body wanted to float a bond to finance a militia for the purpose of suppressing Indian raids, and the English Colonial overseers told them that the term of the bond must be 10 years and not 20 years ( or something like that. ) Franklin's admonition was meant to inspire the governing council not to back down in the face of their English masters. He meant that they should not buckle under to the Penns out of anxiety to raise the militia.
It's a very great stretch to apply this sentiment to the niceties of criminal law as we have come to know them in our own time - something quite alien to Ben Franklin.
6 posted on
12/08/2003 9:17:56 PM PST by
dr_lew
To: Indie
"Europe might be a U.S.S.R. satellite by now."
Williams is a smart man and wonderful commentator. How he doesn't see that the EU is the NEW and IMPROVED Russia I can't understand.
To: Indie
I remain unaware of any liberties I've lost, with the exception of the assault weapons ban.
17 posted on
12/08/2003 9:51:28 PM PST by
squidly
To: Indie
One of the best editorials I've ever read on FIP and terror. It is still very much relevant today.I agree. It is outrageous when the administration would be more distrustful of its LEGAL CITIZENS than those responsible for 9/11.
To: Indie
Had former President Clinton made the same proposal, conservatives would have greeted it with open outrage -- but since it's Bush, shoulder-shrugging indifference carried the day....
------------------------
This is a pattern in everything.
23 posted on
12/08/2003 10:05:16 PM PST by
RLK
To: Indie
24 posted on
12/08/2003 10:59:50 PM PST by
ppaul
To: Lazamataz; Travis McGee; harpseal; SLB; Fred Mertz; AAABEST; Possenti; Grampa Dave; big ern; ...
Kinda interesting.............Stay Safe !
26 posted on
12/08/2003 11:39:51 PM PST by
Squantos
(Support Mental Health !........or........ I'LL KILL YOU !!!!)
To: Indie
Your needlessly excerpted article is linked to the current article, not the one you posted. I wonder how it concludes.
34 posted on
12/09/2003 7:22:48 AM PST by
Atlas Sneezed
(Police officials view armed citizens like teachers union bosses view homeschoolers.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson