Posted on 12/07/2003 3:44:56 PM PST by backhoe
The purpose of this post is to begin providing links, tools, and tactics which we can all use to educate the public, fellow citizens, and neighbors about Hillary Clinton.
It is a work in progress- I have provided a starting point, but want others to chime in with more links, stories, and information.
It is the product of conversations with a number of other members, from which several salient tactical points emerged:
1- keep it as contemporary as possible- the old Whitewater and similar items are stale and dead to the public.
2- keep it civil, please- within the board guidelines, or better. We are trying to convert the mushy middle, and stridency puts them off. Badly.
3- source or reference everything. Authenticity is critical to such an effort.
Here's where it started:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/844024/posts
OMG, UNBELIEVABLE: Wellesley College 1969 Student Commencement Speech of Hillary D. Rodham
http://216.239.37.100/search?q=cache:jNWMQlcpuVsC:www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html+Hillary+Clinton+(Wellesley+commencement)&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 ^ | Circa 1969 | Wellesley web site
If you can find her thesis, please advise because I'd love to read it. Thanks.
The closest thing we have is Barbara Olsens brief review of Hellarys College Thesis and you can read that here: Copy and send that to someone you care about.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1035840/posts?page=198#73
{Please remember that her "Commencement Address" and her "College Thesis" are 2 entirely different entities.)
You don't get it yet, do you? You cannot read her thesis. It is nowhere on the internet. I've spent more hours searching different Search Engines, using different terms than I care to admit. It is unavailable to you and I. Now what I did do for you, was post a link to post #73 (on this very thread) where you may read Barbara Olsen's pithy commentary on Hillary's Thesis. That's all we have. Period. It was sealed by Wellesley College in 1992. Those are the facts. If you choose not to read post 73 on this thread, which is as close to reading her 'Saul Alinsky based hellish thesis' as you're ever going to get, then you've made your choice then haven't you? Sheesh.
Unfortunately for her, I'm no quitter.
Backhoe,my apologies for the above waste of space.At least it's been bumped though.
Thanks for the ^
Where can we find a copy of Hillary's 75 page Wessley college thesis?
.
...HILLARY's College Thesis, praising Communist SAUL ALINSKY's premise that any means is justified to gain Political Power, is buried in the hands of her College that refuses to release it to the American People...
...no matter what.
.
The closest you can get is Post 73 on this Thread.
Thanks, I wanted to ask anyway. I have a couple of biting comments to make about Barbara Olson's quote on Hillary:
She wrote: "His [Alinsky's] new aspect, national planning, derives from the necessity of entrusting social change to institutions, specifically the United States government."
First of all, Friedrich Hayek's Road to Serfdom discusses the planners:
From an online version of TRTS
There's more on The Planners there, and it's not all just about the press by any means. But when we think of the uniformity of our press today, this does ring a bell.
Second, I've argued with "libertarians" and Democrats about the marriage issue, and what often arises from the discussion is that the government has an obligation to extend new moralities to our people via fiat. This is just another form of planning, and of course it grants untold powers to government. The issue of slavery is often mentioned in comparison to marriage "rights." Unlike slavery, which violated an individual's right to be free, the concept of correct and acceptable marriage is an arbitrary value imposed by the majority on its participants. This is true by definition. Marriage seeks civic approval for a particular union. To change a definition accepted by all to one only accepted by the few -- yet using government power to do it -- is right on the roadmap to serfdom. It's only too ironic that issues with slavery and racial civil rights are cited as justification for imposing these forms of "thought control" on the majority.
As a few clear-headed thinkers have observed, marriage is not a right, and collective (non-individual) rights do not exist at all. But collectivizing rights assures the government of increasing powers over the individual. Knowingly or not, marriage activists are pushing for changes that will provide many new powers for enforcing cultural changes.
Alinsky would be proud. And Hillary, with her Village, would make Stalin proud, too. It's too bad plane crashes have taken Olson and Congressman Lawrence P. McDonald, Republican Representative from Georgia's 7th District. And their deaths are all too ironic on a number of levels.
Great post!
Thanks, I feel like I'm just getting started, but I'd be hitting my keyboard all night if I let myself go on just a little bit more... So this is it for now!
Go to bed...pleasant dreams.
.
...No wonder our beloved Freeper 'BKO' just had to slam into the 1st Floor of the Pentagon going over 500 mph on September 11, 2001..?
The Enemy is now Within...
and always has been.
.
.
"Whenever BILL was away, or out of town, HILLARY always sat in the Oval Office" =
...from 'BILL & HILLARY: The Marriage' by CHRIS ANDERSEN
...The Question now is:
...DOING WHAT..???
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.