Posted on 11/29/2003 7:37:52 AM PST by thesummerwind
Edited on 11/29/2003 9:29:46 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Moderator note: I know it's going to be tough, but, please watch the calls for violence against this creature.
In a demoralizing message to U.S. soldiers serving in Iraq, visiting New York Sen. Hillary Clinton told them that Americans back home are growing increasingly skeptical of President Bush's decision to send them into battle.
Describing two meetings with G.I.s over turkey dinners in Baghdad, Sen. Clinton told reporters later that soldiers wanted to know "how the people at home feel about what we are doing."
Clinton said she told the troops, "Americans are wholeheartedly proud of what you are doing but there are many questions at home about the (Bush) administration's policies."
She also suggested that the U.S. could eventually loose the war in Iraq, contending, "We have to exert all of our efforts militarily, but the outcome is not assured."
Despite her sour pronouncements, the former first lady insisted that the soldiers were just as glad to see her as they were President Bush, whose surprise visit less than 24-hours earlier was greeted with standing ovations.
"It's a positive for the commander-in-chief to visit troops in the field," Clinton told reporters, adding, "the troops [also] seemed to appreciate seeing myself."
Speaking from a secure location just over the Kuwaiti border, Mrs. Clinton launched one verbal salvo after another at the White House, arguing that Bush officials had been "obsessed" with getting Saddam Hussein and saying the perception blinded them to the difficulties of deposing his regime.
"The Pentagon tried to make do with as few troops as possible, as light a footprint as they could get away with," Clinton said. "Now, we're playing catchup . . . Unfortunately, I don't think they fully appreciated the conditions we would encounter."
The top Democrat also reprised her charge that the White House is being less than candid when it comes to apprising the American people of the costs of the war.
"The obstacles and problems here are much greater than the administration usually admits to," she said, adding, "Everybody has to be honest."
US Senate Select Committee on Ethics
http://ethics.senate.gov/
http://voinovich.senate.gov/
http://roberts.senate.gov/e-mail_pat.html
http://thomas.senate.gov/html/email.html
Chairman – Direct Contact
Phone: 202-224-4774
Fax: 202-224-3514
Committee – Direct Phone Number
(202) 224 - 2981
Pus-bag. Good term. Think I'll use it in my next sentence. I wouldn't put it past the old pus-bag to have a secret meeting with Saddam while she's over there.
In the early 70’s Hillary, through Marian Edelman was hired as a research assistant by the Carnegie Council on Children, a blue ribbon panel of eleven ‘experts’ assembled by the Carnegie Corporation. It’s mandate, in part, was to respond to the concerns of sociologist Uri Bronfenbrenner, who had compared child rearing in the Soviet Union and thr United States, and found the United States wanting. The Council’s book-length report, All Our Children, is MUST reading for anyone who seeks to understand Hillary Rodham’s vision of the future of American families.
The Carnegie panelists started with the assumption that the triumph of the “universal entitlement state” was inevitable, and the best thing Americans could do for their children was to hasten its arrival. Just as families in an earlier ere turned their children’s education over to the public schools, the report argued, so in the future would government assume responsibilities for many other areas of children’s lives. This being so there was no reason to feel guilty about the rising rate of divorce. The decline of the nuclear family need not be worrisome, because “schools, doctors, and counselors and social workers provide their support whether the family is intact or not. One loses less by divorce today because marriage provides fewer kinds of sustenance and satisfaction.”
More significantly, All Our Children offers a blueprint for undermining the authority of parents whose values the authors consider outmoded. The chapter entitled, “Protection of Children Rights,” the section on which Hillary worked, observes that “it has become necessary for society to make some piecemeal accomodations to prevent parents from denying children certain privileges that society wants them to have.” The report goes on to advocate laws allowing children to consult doctors on matters involving drug use and pregnancy without parental notification, and preventing schools from “unilaterally” suspending or expelling disruptive students.
But this is just the beginning. The Carnegie panel further calls for developing a new class of “public advocates” who will speak for children’s interests on a whole range of issues, from the environment to race relations: “In a simpler world, parents were the only advocates for children. This is no longer true. In a complex society both children and parents need canny advocates.
The report goes on to suggest that “child ombudsmen” be placed in public institutions and some sort of insurance be introduced to enable individual children to hire “decently paid” private attorneys to represent their interests. The possibilities for child advocacy would seem to be endless. For example the report suggests, attornrys could bring class-action lawsuits to hold corporations liable for FUTURE damages their businesses might cause to TODAY’S children.
This is the voice of people who think they know all the answers and want to use children as a tool to impose their will on others. Is it really time for the government to take even more control and responsibility for your children?
In 1972 Hillary spoke at a Democrat platform meeting in Boston. Hillary Rodham testified in favor of a platform that would extend civil and political rights to children. Her position went even beyond that of the Children’s Defense Fund or the Carnegie Council. In an article published in November 1973 in the Harvard Educational Review, she advocated liberating our “child citizens” from the “empire of the father.” This was good feminist reasoning for which the rationale can be found in the writings of Simone de Beauvoir and Jean-Paul Sartre. (“There is no good father, that’s the rule,’ Sartre said. “Don’t lay the blame on men but on the bond of paternity, which is rotten.”)
In Hillary’s own words, “The basic rationale for depriving people of their rights in a dependency relationship is that certain individuals are incapable or undeserving of the right to take care of themselves and consequently need social institutions to safeguard their position…….. Along with the family, past and present examples of such arrangements include marriage, slavery, and the Indian reservation system.”
This ‘It Takes a Village Idiot’, Hillary Rotten, belongs nowhere remotely near the Presidency!
Blue Star Mothers' message board
Sign the Caring Bridge guest book. Messages in this Guestbook are viewed by wounded soldiers, their loved ones and the general public.
Also, another good idea... to order Blue Star Mothers phone cards, suitable for sending to the troops overseas as well as using here at home.
For more ways to support the troops click here.
Of course it's treasonous. It's what they do. The real fault, I'm afraid, lies with those who refuse to hold these people accountable for their actions (and words).
You are evil…that is easy to determine
You have fooled so many people who apparently cannot use their pea brain
It really is insane
Oh, Secret Service, step aside…I'd call you a disgrace
I would say it to your face
I really loathe you…I really loathe you
Jews should know…what are your real feelings
Only stupid ones had believed you when you claimed that you'd not said "FJB"
Oh, come on, Hillary
Please, Secret Service, step aside…I'd call you a disgrace
I would say it to your face
I really loathe you…I really loathe you
I really loathe you…and we know what we're afraid of
There is nothing that's more evil…there is nothing that's quite like you
I really loathe you…the heroes who had stood up booing
They had your face turning red…they said what had to be said
You really are a piece of work…from husband's duty Bill would shirk
He said that he would rather jerk
Ooooooh, I really loathe you…and we know what we're afraid of
There is nothing that's more evil…there is nothing that's quite like you
I really loathe you…the heroes who had stood up booing
They had your face turning red…they said what had to be said
The voters…didn't have B.S. detectors
And everything you did was scripted…the settings you controlled, yes, indeed
You're really a bad seed
Please, Secret Service, step aside…and I would call you a disgrace
I would say it to your face
Yes, I really loathe you…yes, I really loathe you
I really loathe you…I really loathe you
Yes, I really loathe you…I really loathe you
I really loathe you…I really loathe you
I really loathe you…yes, I really loathe you
She may yet see that she sold out anything of lasting value, trampled on good, and manufactured harmful illusions for her own gain; interfering with the process of newly liberating millions of people, and mounting offense on the liberty of hundreds of millions more.
Her misery will be beyond words.
Oh well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.