[StACase]

As a matter of priority, the Democrats want to get rid of President Bush more than they want to get rid of international terrorism.

[backhoe]

Here is the ad ( requires RealPlayer )-- judge for yourself:

President Bush Ad airing in Iowa

[tkathy]

The non stop Bush bashing may be turning off voters to the dims. Their credibility is tanking more with each irrational ranting.

[where's_the_Outrage?]

She lost her seat in Congress over her accusations, and now she claims she was ousted from office in a Republican conspiracy.

LOL, imagine, a conspiracy from Republicans to defeat a DemocRAT in an election. I think this is the 1st time I actually agree with something she says.

[trustandobey]

Wonderful to see Republicans run an ad that makes the dems mad! I'm living for the day when we all stand up and shout " I'm CONSERVATIVE, and proud of it."

[grumple]

Why do we continue to call them Democrats?

[ChadGore]

[jmstein7]

BUMP!

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

The Bush ad didn’t even name names. It merely said “some” have criticized him for attacking the terrorists, and though that is not true of the more responsible of his critics, it certainly is true of some. If the Democrats want to clean up political rhetoric regarding the War on Terror, they ought to examine their own camp first.

And some--"JFK" for example--have criticized Bush for doing to little and for doing too much on the WOT. A few RNC ads playing clips of "some" trying to have it both ways would IMHO do wonders for the nation's political discourse.

The RNC will also have to consider advertising that Democrat memo on how to politicize the Senate Intelligence Committee in the most egregious way possible.

[Let's Roll]

Only if the President has a "D" after his name.

[LiteKeeper]

INTREP - DemoRAT hypocrisy peaking through