Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Panel Rules Justice Moore Failed to Respect & Comply with Law; Judge removed from Supreme Court

Posted on 11/13/2003 9:23:02 AM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs

More to follow


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 10commandments; 1stamendment; aclu; alabama; byebyeloser; constitution; court; courthouse; creator; decalogue; firstamendment; founders; foundingfathers; fundiemania; goodriddence; justice; justicemoore; justiceroymoore; law; lawbreaker; laws; lawyers; moore; naturesgod; roymoore; supremecourt; tencommandments; usconstitution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 701-707 next last
To: Servant of the 9
About what a ruthless unprincipled scoundrel and all around classic Southern Con Man Mr. Moore is.

Watch the films Elmer Gantry and The Flim-Flam Man, both excellent.

161 posted on 11/13/2003 10:11:45 AM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: ohioman; lugsoul
From my understanding, he was from low class beginnings, got lucky enough to get nominated for West Point, then became a nearly fragged veteran because the troops despised him, and left the military after his stint was up.
162 posted on 11/13/2003 10:11:48 AM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
There is no question the world, particularly liberals, hate christians. Christ promised we would be hated. American Christians are hyper sensitive to somebody calling them a bad name or slandering them. We should rejoice not organize a protest and cry. I could name not a few countries where those who follow Christ are truly persecuted. The church in those places are heathly, established in the faith, and able to stand.
163 posted on 11/13/2003 10:12:36 AM PST by week 71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

164 posted on 11/13/2003 10:12:40 AM PST by jgrubbs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
You consider the "unsaved" to be second-class citizens?

What they sow, so shall they reap. They are what they choose to be. It's their call.

165 posted on 11/13/2003 10:13:06 AM PST by concerned about politics ( So it is. It is done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
LOL - his own words and actions pound him.

What a precious phrase.

So he himself used the words "psychotic" and "carnie huckster"? I don't believe he did. Do you have evidence to the contrary?

166 posted on 11/13/2003 10:13:21 AM PST by TheBigB (One picture is worth a thousand dollars, but the sheep has to be wearing lipstick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Then he had no business being a judge.

Hitler's judges obeyed the law too. Bad laws MUST BE BROKEN. Try doing some reading on the basis of Law - try there writers: Grotius, Puffendorf, Blackstone, Vattel, Locke - they are the ones read by our founding fathers and whose ideas were incorporated into our legal system and govt. Before 1890, Blacktone was the number one legal reference in all law schools (Christian).

167 posted on 11/13/2003 10:13:46 AM PST by exmarine (sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
You had better write a letter and demand that those murals of Moses be painted over in the chambers of the U.S. Congress, that that bible verse from Leviticus be sanded off the Liberty Bell, that those hypocrites stop saying "God save the Supreme Court" before every session

Specious argument alert!

I guess we'd also have to remove the depictions of Confuscious, Muhammed and Hammurabi as well, correct? Since they are also in the Supreme court building in a display that commemorates the great law givers in history?

168 posted on 11/13/2003 10:14:46 AM PST by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
Christian scientists who made the biggest discoveries in history (Newton, Kepler, Copernicus, Galileo, Pasteur, Farraday, etc. etc.),

Isn't it a little cheeky for Christianity to claim credit for the discoveries of Copernicus and Galileo when Christianity actively surpressed Coperinican theory and put Galileo on trial???
169 posted on 11/13/2003 10:15:17 AM PST by Belial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
What is really sad is that in order to uphold the Christian principles of his state and those on which this country was begun...that Moore would be put in such a position in the first place. That the court system has become so hostile toarwd Christianity that it is being banished from America one lawsuit at a time. Well the current method of going along with these courts is not working. This judge had the guts to call it what it was. An illegal order and as a fact- based on false law. Lets hope more judges will have the guts he has. Lets hope that it will wake more people up. Although I admit that based on many of the replies on this thread I am not too hopeful. To many people can't see that the system is corrupt to the point where the checks and balances no longer work reliably.
170 posted on 11/13/2003 10:16:06 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
It obviously upsets you to no end that non-Christians are treated as equal citizens in this society.
Too bad for you
171 posted on 11/13/2003 10:16:06 AM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs; P-Marlowe
No, I'm not.

I suspect he isn't either.....which means he thinks he can cause a 3-way split of votes instead of a 45-45-10.

He just said on TV that he has not thought of running for office. (He didn't say which office.) Although he said that if he is "forced" to that he would (reluctantly.)

One important point he made is that there's a statue of a Greek Goddes (I think he said Athena) in the courtyard of the District Court. That indicates to me that he sees it partially as a speech issue. When he makes it a speech issue, I'm in full agreement with him. (He said that walking past that statue didn't make him uncomfortable about justice at all.)

I'm in agreement that it is pure hyprocricy to have all those other acknowledgements of God but be denied this one.

Do you see it as hypocritical?
172 posted on 11/13/2003 10:16:19 AM PST by xzins (Proud to be Army!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
Christian scientists who made the biggest discoveries in history (Newton, Kepler, Copernicus, Galileo, Pasteur, Farraday, etc. etc.)

What ever, except possibly a deranged Sunday School teacher, ever gave you the idea that any of those were Christian?

And by the way most of our founders were Deists by belief and nominal Christians because that helped keep the trash under control.

So9

173 posted on 11/13/2003 10:16:57 AM PST by Servant of the 9 (A Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Belial
Isn't it a little cheeky for Christianity to claim credit for the discoveries of Copernicus and Galileo when Christianity actively surpressed Coperinican theory and put Galileo on trial???

That shows your ignorance. The Catholic church indeed opposed Galileo (as did all scientists of his day), but Galileo was a believer in Jesus Christ regardless of the false teachings of the catholic church, who still believed in a false Aristotlean universe (Aristotle was not a Christian by the way). None of this changes the fact that Galileo had the Christian worldview.

174 posted on 11/13/2003 10:17:44 AM PST by exmarine (sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
Hitler's judges obeyed the law too.

And the nerve of some of these people who want to buy guns when "the law" says "no!"
The nerve of some to want school choice, when the powers that be said "no."
Some even want to stop taxation , even after the law said "no".
Therefore, they're happy with these "laws", too. After all, it's "the law."

Go figure.

175 posted on 11/13/2003 10:18:05 AM PST by concerned about politics ( So it is. It is done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
There are a lot of people on this board who should take all the money in their wallets and in their bank accounts and burn it! It states "IN GOD WE TRUST"
176 posted on 11/13/2003 10:18:10 AM PST by TrueBeliever9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
"Carnie huckster" is rooted in the entire exercise, the best part being the emphatic request to hold these proceedings in an arena.

"Psychotic" is rooted in his belief that he was right and would prevail.

177 posted on 11/13/2003 10:18:16 AM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
Bad laws MUST BE BROKEN

Another vote for theocracy, I see. If some southern states still want to strike out, I say have at it. Enjoy Alabamistan.
178 posted on 11/13/2003 10:18:38 AM PST by Belial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Patriot1998

I believe Judge Moores action is the begining of a rebellion against an overeaching judiciary.

I think there is going to have to be a point when a President is just going to have to say no to the Supreme Court order. A President is going to have to face them down and say your job is to interpret the law not make the law. Your order is not based on the Constitution it is based on your political belief concerning what is 'best' for the country.
I don't like this idea, I think it is dangerous but I see no other way to return this country to a government of the people not a government of judges.
179 posted on 11/13/2003 10:18:58 AM PST by Jonah Johansen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
Judge Roy More is to be removed from his seat as Justice on the Supreme Court of Alabama

This action is being taken by the State of Alabama, not the federal government. Judge Moore took the position that his office and oath required him to conduct himself as he did. The State of Alabama is apparently taking a contrary position.

Is there anything wrong with the State of Alabama defining for itself the duties and functions of its own Chief Justice?

180 posted on 11/13/2003 10:19:06 AM PST by Scenic Sounds (A veces, la locura reside tan cerca como una peca mera.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 701-707 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson