Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Republic to Protest Rather “Fair and Balanced” Award
Free Republic Network ^ | 10-5-03 | Bob J

Posted on 11/04/2003 7:32:43 PM PST by Bob J

Columnists' Corner

"Free Republic to Protest Rather “Fair and Balanced” Award"

By Bob Johnson

This Monday the Museum of Television and Radio will be honoring Dan Rather at the Beverly Hills Hotel for his life long commitment to fair and balanced news reporting.

That’s right.

To anyone familiar with the CBS Evening News, this might come as a surprise. For decades, anyone to the right of John Kennedy is firmly aware of Rather’s outright bias and left wing manipulation of the news. The suggestion is at best, comical.

Of course, the Museum of Television and Film can honor anyone they want for whatever reason, it’s a free country. But don’t insult our sensibility by proclaiming Dan Rather fair and balanced.

Rather, an ardent abortion supporter, devoutly uses the terms “abortion rights” and “a woman’s right to choose” to portray the issue and refers to those protecting life as “anti-abortion” or “anti-woman’s rights.” He refuses to use the term “partial birth,” instead preferring the newspeak of those fond of this procedure, “late term.” He never missed an opportunity to declare it “rarely used”, that is until it’s frequent use was publicly admitted by supporters in 1997.

Another liberal cause held dear by Rather is affirmative action. When California voters eliminated portions of it with Prop 209, Rather described it as “…the big setback for affirmative action. The high court today upheld California's ban on programs designed to fight discrimination against women and minorities...” and called it a “counterattack against affirmative action.” Without shame he compared the passage of 209 with chemical experimentation on humans with this quip. “Earlier tonight, we reported the President's apology for medical experiments that allowed black Americans to die of syphilis. The President noted how badly this hurt public trust in government, especially among minorities. The same criticism is being made today on another score. As CBS News correspondent John Blackstone reports, it's the fallout from California's voter-approved ban on state affirmative action programs.”

Rather’s assault on legislation aimed at ending what many believe to be a racial spoils system did not begin or end with Prop 209. He summarizes the 1995 Supreme Court ruling ending racial gerrymandering of voting districts as “…a ruling that will make it harder for African-Americans, Hispanics, and other minorities to win elective office and a share of political power.” Bill Clinton’s difficulties inserting militant left winger Bill Lan Lee to the nation’s top civil right’s enforcement post did not escape his attention. Rather attempted to smear Lee’s detractors as bigots stating “Lee's opponents cite his support for affirmative action, designed to fight discrimination against women and minorities.”

Socialists, democrats and Dan Rather have never met a tax they didn’t love and any attempt to reduce the power of the state is treated as heresy. Rather has been a good soldier in this battle, stoking the flames of class envy and chipping away at efforts to put a few bucks back into the pockets of taxpayers. Rather does not report on tax reduction proposals without sticking the phrase “give away for the wealthy” to them like a piece of Juicy Fruit to the bottom of our shoes. Reduce tax rates? Give away for the wealthy. Increase the child tax credit? Give away for the wealthy.

Ronald Reagan’s tax cut helped lift this country out of the mire of recession and rocketing interest rates, but is described by Rather thusly, “In America in the 1980s, what former President Reagan and those who support him call the Reagan Revolution put more money in the pockets of the rich. We already knew that. But a new study indicates that those who did best of all by far were the very richest of the rich.”

The word “richest” alone must have lost its punch.

When Democrats reside in the White House, recessions are a sign of prosperity right around the corner while Republican economic recoveries are quagmires spiced with conservative policy condemnations.

In not so subtle attempts to undermine public support for programs and legislation with which he personally disagrees, Rather routinely inserts derogatory comments from unnamed sources and “critics” of Republican efforts while spiking substantive facts from experts and even legislative sponsors themselves. Here’s Rather on Bush’s tax cut plan;

“On Capitol Hill, the Republican-controlled House voted mostly along party lines tonight to pass President Bush's federal budget blueprint. This includes his big tax-cut plan, partly bankrolled, critics say, through cuts in many federal aid programs for children and education."

But Rather doesn’t stop at including Democrat comments and ignoring those from Republicans. In this 1997 broadcast Rather clearly inserts personal opinions into a summary of comments supporting a balanced budget.

“On Capitol Hill, the Senate voted overwhelming approval today for the big balanced budget blueprint. Supporters of the plan say it would balance the budget in five years, provide $85 billion in tax breaks mostly for families with children, cut the capital gains tax which would help immediately the wealthy, and save $321 billion out of Medicare, defense and other spending.”

Yes Dan, I’m certain supporters of balanced budget efforts would include the phrase “which would help immediately the wealthy” into their talking points.

We could go on and on but you get the picture. From campaign finance to global warming to gun control to health care, Rather never misses a opportunity to provide support and cover for left wing ideas and Democrat positions while bashing conservative ideas and proposals.

On Monday, members of the Los Angeles Chapter of Free Republic will be there to meet the Museum’s coterie of fans, supporters and Dan. I think I’ll stroll down to the Beverly Hills Hotel and let them know what I think of their 2003 Award recipient. Hey, it’s a free country.

The author would like to thank the website www.ratherbiased.com for information included in this column.

© 2003 Bob Johnson. The author can be reached at BobJ@freeper.org.



TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; US: California
KEYWORDS: awards; bobj; cbs; cbsnews; danrather; doublespeak; fairandbalanced; mediabias; occafrrather; rather; ratherbiased; seebs; viacom; viacommie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: daviddennis
It appears that there is a fair amount of FREE parking - on many of the local surface streets.
I recommend that you FIRST look on the west side of Crescent, where we will be gathering.
The EAST side of that stret is "No Parking at ANY TIME."
41 posted on 11/05/2003 9:54:29 AM PST by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
street
42 posted on 11/05/2003 9:56:52 AM PST by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
See also, from the OTHER thread about this:

LA Chapter - Rather FReep - Monday - Media Advisory
LA Resistance Chapter ^ | 11-4-03 | Bob J
Posted on 11/04/2003 4:42 PM PST by Bob J

NEWS RELEASE

LOS ANGELES CHAPTER OF FREEREPUBLIC
www.freerepublic.com www.freerepublic.net

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Ron Smith
NOVEMBER 5, 2003
310-416-9155
RonSmith@quixnet.net

MEDIA ADVISORY

FREE REPUBLIC TO PROTEST DAN RATHER AWARD
PRESS CONFERENCE AND PROTEST SCHEDULED

LOS ANGELES, CA – Ron Smith, Leader of the Free Republic Chapter of Los Angeles, announced today that their organization will hold a rally to protest the Museum of Television and Radio's decision to honor CBS news anchor Dan Rather for his "steadfast commitment to fair and accurate news reporting" at their annual awards dinner Monday night at the Beverly Hills Hotel.

From his depiction of Reagan voters as "children having a tantrum", his refusal to tell America the truth about Bill and Hillary Clinton to his powder puff interviews of American enemies like Saddam Hussein, Kim Jong Il and Fidel Castro, Dan Rather has proven he is neither fair nor accurate. He has used his position as CBS anchor to manipulate the truth and provide cover for leftwing causes and the politically correct. The only thing Dan Rather should be honored for is being the least trustworthy network anchor and leading CBS EVENING NEWS to the ratings cellar.

DATE:MONDAY NOVEMBER 10, 2003
TIME: 6:00-8:00 PM
LOCATION: BEVERLY HILLS HOTEL
9641 SUNSET BOULEVARD
BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210

The press conference and protest will begin promptly at 6:00pm.

For additional information or to schedule an interview please contact Mr. Smith at (310) 416-9155.

--30--
CLICK HERE for the rest of that thread

43 posted on 11/05/2003 11:32:04 AM PST by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
I'll be with you in spirit.
44 posted on 11/05/2003 11:51:23 AM PST by bert (Don't Panic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonDog; Bob J
His most egregious sin and that which completely upset the Republic, was calling the election in Florida for Gore before polls closed in the Panhandle. There was lots of discussion here about precisely how many votes thet cost President Bush, but there is no doubt that there would have been no question of a close race if Dan had not decietfully acted as he did.

He deserves the condemnation of American History for this act alone.
45 posted on 11/05/2003 11:56:57 AM PST by bert (Don't Panic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
Maybe Merv will come out and join you guys?
46 posted on 11/05/2003 2:35:33 PM PST by Rockitz (After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
From the piece:

"Museum of Television and Radio will be honoring Dan Rather "

[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[

If only the museum was stuffing Rather, and placing him on display.

I come to see that..!!

FRegards,

47 posted on 11/05/2003 5:09:17 PM PST by Osage Orange (Today's Republican's are the Mod. Democrats of J.F.K's era, and today's Democrats are Socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing; autoresponder; Grampa Dave

Dan Rather Pencil Sharpener
Brand new! Not Sold In Stores!
NOW JUST $19.95 + Spinning and Lying
C'mon, kids! Stick it in The Dan's ear!

48 posted on 11/05/2003 6:06:54 PM PST by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
This Monday the Museum of Television and Radio will be honoring Dan Rather at the Beverly Hills Hotel for his life long commitment to fair and balanced news reporting.

This is beyond laughable.

Rather should get the media bias award.

49 posted on 11/05/2003 8:26:30 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange
Giving Komrade Ratherinsky such an award is like bestowing the UN Humanitarian Award upon "Uncle Joe" STALIN, no?

Joseph GOEBBELS, Hitler's Propaganda Minister, would have been proud to call Rather his "Son", I opine.

Don't forget what Komrade Dan has done for the Second Ammendment over the years, too!

Hey!; I didn't see "Babs" Streisand or Hanoi Jane on the list of honored guests; surely they have been invited?

How about Bill and Hellary? Aren't they and Rather the best of friends?

Hopefully, the majority of senscient American People are beginning to see this phony-baloney plastic-bananna good-time rock-'n-roll dope-sucking bunch of elitist snobs for who they really are, and stop taking them the least bit seriously, if they ever have to begin with.
50 posted on 11/05/2003 8:32:20 PM PST by Uncle Jaque ("We need a Revival; Not a Revolution;... a Committment; Not a New Constitution..." -S. GREEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
haha ! I love that pic and caption !

51 posted on 11/06/2003 2:38:33 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
IF ol' Dan is fair and balanced, then why is cbs losing viewers and ad revenue daily?

5.56mm

52 posted on 11/06/2003 3:57:03 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
"Rather: "...I think you can be an honest person and lie about any number of things."

Braindead Lib'ralism on parade...MUD

53 posted on 11/06/2003 6:45:32 AM PST by Mudboy Slim (RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
What's the frequency Kenneth? Rather is rather deep and disturbed/ing...

http://www.findarticles.com/cf_0/m1111/1819_303/80680397/print.jhtml

54 posted on 11/06/2003 8:25:20 AM PST by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
When I first started reading that bit, I was waiting for the punch line. But NOooo ! lol !

Rather's eagerness to put the issue to rest is understandable. The event, fueled by rumor and gossip, has dogged him. The rock band R.E.M. turned the cryptic mugging into a song, "What's the Frequency, Kenneth?" Rather's curious misfortune has clearly entered the public consciousness and become a touchstone for a generation. I'm sure he would like it to go away, and there are undoubtedly many out there who would like to help Mr. Rather in this effort.

I found this a long time ago and have posted it quite a few times.

“What’s The Frequency, Kenneth?”
http://www.ratherbiased.com/bizarre.htm#kenneth

Hear R.E.M.’s Song/Lyrics: “What’s The Frequency, Kenneth?”
http://www.ratherbiased.com/frequency.mp3


55 posted on 11/06/2003 11:21:02 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
I'd vote for Rather to get the "Despair and Unbalanced" Award.

Glad you are Freeping it.

56 posted on 11/06/2003 7:22:05 PM PST by harpo11 (Rush, He Ain't Heavy, He's Our Brother... Best Wishes, Godspeed. Rush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
I remember Dan Rather.
He was always tough to take, and I finally gave up watching his newscast back in them olden days before cable and satellite. Of course, the Canadian socialist Jennings was nearly as bad, and Brokaw was also too liberal, although he usually had more class than the other two. (By the way, what are those guys doing these days? I know Brokaw turned to writing books....)

I never heard of this "Museum of Television and Radio", but clearly the people who run that thing are a mischievous pack of pranksters for selecting Rather for a "Fair and Balanced" award. The whole thing sounds to me like they are trying to take a jab at Fox News, to be honest. So now these funny scumbags have gone and turned this "Museum" into a laughingstock with no integrity or credibility. Well, good riddance. I think the joke will be on them.
57 posted on 11/06/2003 7:41:13 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Don't be so sure about that. Look at what happened with CBS and their Reagan hit piece.

they also got spanked over their two part series ,The Dark Side of Homeschooling. Congress even sent them a letter about it. Sponsors dropped out of the second part.

58 posted on 11/06/2003 8:30:00 PM PST by Diva Betsy Ross ((were it not for the brave, there would be no land of the free -))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Does the Media know about the letter from Congress expressing their displeasure over the the Dark Side of Homeschooling. I know it isn't that big of a deal, but do all network news anchors who are being honored for being fair and balanced have that on "their record"?
59 posted on 11/06/2003 8:32:35 PM PST by Diva Betsy Ross ((were it not for the brave, there would be no land of the free -))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
It depends on the definition of the words "fair" and "balanced". In their lexicon, it's "fair" to demonize conservatives and "balanced" if you censor their opinions. Therefore, Rather is the epitome of "fair and balanced." </dem-parse>
60 posted on 11/07/2003 3:40:36 PM PST by PsyOp ( Citizenship ought to be reserved for those who carry arms. - Aristotle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson