Skip to comments.
G.G Liddy discussing Terri Schiavo now (Call him)
Radio
| 10-16-03
| Myself
Posted on 10/16/2003 7:29:20 AM PDT by JulieRNR21
G. Gordon Liddy is now discussing the removal of Terri Schiavo's feeding tube.
He wants to hear from your opinion about what is happening.
Call him here: 1-800-GGLiddy
TOPICS: Announcements; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: ggordonliddy; jebbush; schiavo; terri; terrischiavo; terrischindler
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-230 next last
To: sarasota
Don't mind him, sarasota. Some folks would not understand even if they were on board the Underground Railroad.
The law isn't perfect yet, else innocent disabled people wouldn't be starving to death in the presence of police guards in the United States.
To: G.Mason
Can you not grasp the far-reaching effects this has, the potential for it to be a landmark case in the fight FOR euthanasia?
You say nothing can be done - I bet lots of Germans said that when their Jewish friends and neighbors were taken away. Those same Germans were no doubt a little taken aback when they came for the old, disabled, disfigured and mentally impaired.
Do you not see where this is all going? What's that old adage...they came for the Jews, Christians, I said nothing etc...then they came for me.
You said in a later post that the rule of law was followed. Just because it is law, doesn't mean it is right. Slavery was once legal. Abortion is legal now. If tomorrow a law was passed saying that it's ok to euthanize anyone over 65, anyone who can't feed themselves, anyone who can't recite the alphabet, run a mile, would that be ok because it is law?
You also asked if posters would be willing to pay her hospital bills. That's a moot point. First of all the hospice where she stays hasn't been paid a thing (probably because the husband's lawyer was a board chairman there), and also, her parents have said that they will pay for any care she needs, they just want to take her home.
Do nothing? Resign ourselves to the inevitable? I guess this country is run by a few judges then. So much for we the people.
42
posted on
10/16/2003 8:58:55 AM PDT
by
agrace
To: jmc813
"
Had you been alive at the time, would you have turned in runaway slaves? Would you have supported the prosecution of Rosa PArks for sitting at the front of the bus?"
The sad thing about the above questions is that you're serious.
43
posted on
10/16/2003 8:59:52 AM PDT
by
G.Mason
(Lessons of life need not be fatal)
To: JulieRNR21
Maybe this is something his son could also talk about. See
http://www.kfyi.com . Except for Coast to Coast and a little news blurb before Coast to Coast I haven't heard it mentioned much in Arizona.
To: MeeknMing; pc93; cyn; CindyDawg; JohnHuang2; Ragtime Cowgirl; Pegita; Humidston; MarMema; All
Please make a mega ping for others to go to read:
BREAKING NEWS on www.terrisfight.org
New information indicates that JEB could issue an executive order to open an investigation.
One of the documents states:
To: Christa Calamas, Esq.
From: Brian Fahling, Esq.
Re: Authority of Governor Bush to Issue Executive Order
Date: October 16, 2003
Question 1: Does Governor Bush have authority to issue an executive order pursuant to Section 943.04(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2002) to order the Department of Criminal Justice Investigations and Forensic Science to conduct an investigation of an alleged violation of Section 782.08 Florida Statutes (assisted suicide)?
Question 2: Would such an order under the circumstances of the present case constitute an intrusion of the executive branch into, or create a conflict with, the lawful authority of the judicial branch?
DISCUSSION
I. Authority To Issue Executive Order
The governor of the State of Florida possesses authority under the Florida Constitution, Article IV, Section 1(a), to see that the laws are faithfully executed. Section 943.04 authorizes the governor, upon written order, to direct the Department of Criminal Justice Investigations and Forensic Science (Department) to investigate violations of any of the criminal laws of the state. In Thompson v. State, 342 So.2d 52 (Fla. 1976), the Florida Supreme Court upheld the authority given to the governor under Section 943.04, saying [t]he power to see that laws are faithfully executed, which is essentially what Chapter 943 is designed to achieve, derives from Article IV, Section 1(a) of the Florida Constitution. Thompson at 55.
The brief filed by the Governor in the Middle District of Florida sets forth significant reasons to believe that Section 782.02 is being violated because Terris right to life is violated by the state when the state, acting as her guardian, assumes that her wish to live without artificial sustenance is the same as a wish not to be fed at all. The state has an unqualified interest in life. Brief at 5. Moreover, Terri is being denied oral sustenance, which creates an unnecessary conflict with Florida Statutory law by implying that physicians may cooperate with a persons alleged express wish not to feed herself . . . . Id. at p. 6. A denial of Terris right to life under these circumstances, it appears, results in a violation of Section 782.08.
The laws of the State of Florida, then, as set forth in the Governors brief, are not being faithfully executed. The authority of the governor to issue an executive order in this case is consonant with his duty to see that the laws are faithfully executed.
II. An Executive Order Does Not Impugn the Authority of the Court
The trial court order merely authorized Terris husband to direct that oral sustenance be denied her. An executive order that orders an investigation in this matter, with the concomitant appropriate actions that would be taken if a violation of Section 782.08 is found, does nothing to impugn the authority of the court. The executive order would ultimately operate only upon the husbands decision which he is merely permitted to make. It is interference with private discretion, not with judicial authority. If the consequences of the husbands exercise of discretion are determined to result in the unlawful taking of life, it is entirely appropriate that such actions be interdicted by law enforcement at the direction of the governor.
45
posted on
10/16/2003 9:05:48 AM PDT
by
JulieRNR21
(Take W-04....Across America!)
To: All
Anyone have a weblink where I can listen to Liddy?
46
posted on
10/16/2003 9:09:28 AM PDT
by
FourPeas
To: Graymatter
His/her tagline says volumes: "Lessons of life need not be fatal."
47
posted on
10/16/2003 9:14:27 AM PDT
by
sarasota
To: G.Mason
Okay, for the sake of argument, how much money are you willing to pay towards her hospital bills? If that question is not to your liking, just who shall be responsible for maintaining her?
Her parents want to take her home and, apparently there are doctors who believe that therapy will help her. The husband has blocked any therapy. He's even blocked antibiotics when she's been ill. This isn't such a "cut and dried" issue at all.
48
posted on
10/16/2003 9:14:42 AM PDT
by
DJ MacWoW
("I'm gonna need a hacksaw" - Jack Bauer)
To: agrace
Wonderful post. I'm pinging this one for further reference.
49
posted on
10/16/2003 9:16:17 AM PDT
by
sarasota
To: G.Mason
The sad thing about the above questions is that you're serious. I'm damned serious. You claimed that the rule of law must be followed. Where do you draw the line? When civil rights are violated? When guns are banned?
50
posted on
10/16/2003 9:16:24 AM PDT
by
jmc813
(Ron Paul for President in '08!)
To: JulieRNR21
That is a great idea. Do you have any contacts?
51
posted on
10/16/2003 9:17:39 AM PDT
by
sarasota
To: FourPeas
Anyone have a weblink where I can listen to Liddy? Click here
To: agrace
"
You said in a later post that the rule of law was followed."
I did not say that.
What I said was "Perhaps I am missing something here, and I don't mean to sound cruel and uncaring, but has the rule of law not been followed?"
I asked a question.
"Do you not see where this is all going?"
Suffice it to say I do not.
IMHO To equate this with the proverbial Germans VS the Jews, slavery, abortion, et al. is but flack thrown in the face of reality as it concerns the Terri Schiavo situation.
I will end my comments with this. Terri Schiavo's situation is very sad, however it will not bring about euthanasia for the masses, the Germans won't be executing Jews in the near future, and slavery will probably remain active only in third world countries not in the U.S. .
53
posted on
10/16/2003 9:18:36 AM PDT
by
G.Mason
(Lessons of life need not be fatal)
To: FourPeas
Go to LiddyShow.com
Don't know if he's still discussing Terri. He's only on 2 hrs. where I am.
54
posted on
10/16/2003 9:22:19 AM PDT
by
JulieRNR21
(Take W-04....Across America!)
To: sarasota; pc93; cyn; SwordofTruth; Pegita; freeparoundtheclock; Theodore R.; All
Unfortunately I do not....there was breaking news on www.terrisfight a little while ago but can't find it now.
There were legal documents indicating that JEB has some legal grounds to issue an Executive Order.
Let's pray that he will do so ASAP.
55
posted on
10/16/2003 9:26:18 AM PDT
by
JulieRNR21
(Take W-04....Across America!)
To: JulieRNR21; kimmie7; PrepareToLeave
thanks for info julie -- am thinking of coming down, do more people there help?
Ideas -- Katherine Harris as frmr atty gen'l
Call local hospices (be nice; there ARE good people out there) to express concern about Terri -- I did. Turns out they'd gotten email updates from Terri's hospice.
SPOON campaign -- her mom would be GLAD to spoon feed Terri -- something her husband has denied her! (inspired by Kimmie7's earlier idea) -- send in plastic spoons -- if I do come, my sign will have spoons attached & will pass them out.
RTL -- local, national -- anything from them?
feminists for life -=- FEMINISTS FOR LIFE!! great group
Any way to hit that hospice, Michael, the lawyers in the pocketbook -- now or later?
Thinking as many are about making Michael miserable if he succeeds in killing Terri.
56
posted on
10/16/2003 9:29:24 AM PDT
by
cyn
To: jmc813
"
I'm damned serious. "
You asked me ....... "Had you been alive at the time, would you have turned in runaway slaves?"
You ask me a question posed about an issue in the mid 1800's that I am to answer with a mind based on present day morays?
Yet I am to take you seriously?
Look, I have no doubt that you and many thousands of people feel like you do. It is admiral to be caring and concerned.
I wish no harm to Terri. I, in no way, indicated this was good or bad. I simply asked if the rule of law had not been followed.
57
posted on
10/16/2003 9:30:38 AM PDT
by
G.Mason
(Lessons of life need not be fatal)
To: sarasota; pc93; SwordofTruth; freeparoundtheclock; Pegita; cyn; CindyDawg
58
posted on
10/16/2003 9:30:59 AM PDT
by
JulieRNR21
(Take W-04....Across America!)
To: G.Mason
I won't strawman you over the head but I am curious, is she indeed comatose?
I'm no doc but she does not look comatose to me. She does look quite brain damaged and unable to feed herself but is that comatose. She is not on a respirator and appears to respond to some stimuli.
I'm not saying she will ever recover but can we kill her because she is in a twilight of sorts and unable to feed herself.
Also, why will the husband not allow her parents to take over as her guardians since they have asked for that?
59
posted on
10/16/2003 9:33:06 AM PDT
by
wardaddy
To: JulieRNR21
There are two letters from Thomas Moore law Center to Jeb Bush on Terri's website. One is dated yesterday, one today. They set out legal reasoning why Jeb can intervene.
60
posted on
10/16/2003 9:33:28 AM PDT
by
CFW
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-230 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson