Posted on 11/02/2017 8:52:53 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Hillary Clinton’s campaign took over the Democratic National Committee's funding and day-to-day operations early in the primary season and may have used that power to undermine her rival Senator Bernie Sanders, according to the party's one-time interim chairwoman.
The DNC official, Donna Brazile, now a political analyst, wrote in Politico Magazine on Thursday that she discovered an August 2015 agreement between the national committee and Clinton’s campaign and fundraising arm that gave Clinton “control (of) the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised” in exchange for taking care of the massive debt leftover from President Barack Obama’s 2012 campaign.
It wasn't illegal, Brazile said, "but it sure looked unethical."
"If the fight had been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party before the voters had decided which one they wanted to lead," Brazile wrote. "This was not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it compromised the party’s integrity."
Brazile wrote that she had “promised” Sanders to find out if the DNC had intentionally “rigged” the primary system in order to prop up Clinton and assure she became the nominee.....
(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...
RATS NEVER turn on each other. They stick together like glue, no matter what!
The only thing I can think is that Brazile thinks Hillary is going to jail. Why else attack her, pretending that the folks who now run the DNC had nothing to do with it?
The only thing I can think is that Brazile thinks Hillary is going to jail. Why else attack her, pretending that the folks who now run the DNC had nothing to do with it?
I won’t click Newsweek, but there is another excerpt says that, unknown to Brazile ;) ,the Clinton campaign had taken control of DNC finances under Debbie W-S, and we’re calling all the shots. Now let’s see...Who was it that paid for the dossier? Why the Clinton campaign and the DNC. In other words, Clinton.
Who signed the check to pay for the hit on Seth rich?
If the democrats can’t even handle the finances of their own party, why should the public at large trust them to lead the nation at a time when the national debt is nearly twenty trillion dollars?
“As if she wasn’t part of the conspiracy.”
My first thought. She’s a slimeball, it’s beyond me how she can still show her face on TV.
I was waiting for someone to bring up Brazille having passed the debate questions to Hillary before her debate with Sanders.
When 51% of the voters hate your guts, you don’t have much of a chance.
Deal with it Hillary.
Here, have another drink.
It's Democrat...
Democrat party.
I guess you missed the article at the top of the thread. Donna Brazile just turned on the Clintons.
the Democratic party
the Democrat party
Officially, it’s the Democratic party. Unless you want to throw a gentle jab at the party as a whole. Then it’s the Democrat party. Writer’s choice.
I do ;-)
There's nothing democratic about the Democrat party.
LOL good one.
You keep telling yourself that, sparky.
Neither the blacks nor Latins would've turned out for an antediluvian lily-white cis-het Socialist.
Nor would the feminist cat ladies: it was *HER* turn.
That's the problem with identity politics: once you take away the spoils, all the splinter groups turn on each other fighting for scraps.
Forget the thread.
You just won FREE REPUBLIC for the day.
Only one question: was it Huma or Bill filming this on the iPhone? ;-P
If the democrats can’t even handle the finances of their own party, why should the public at large trust them to lead the nation at a time when the national debt is nearly twenty trillion dollars?
Will be interesting and fun to watch who unloads on the Clintons next.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.