Hillary Donors Could Have Fed 6 Million Hungry Children For A Year With Wasted Campaign Money

The Daily Caller ^ | December 16, 2016 | Peter Hasson, associate editor

[2ndDivisionVet]

Supporters of Hillary Clinton could have fed more than six million hungry children for a year with the money they poured into Clinton’s failed presidential campaign.

The New York Post reported Friday that Hillary Clinton and her supporters spent a record $1.2 billion in their unsuccessful efforts to get Hillary into the White House. That’s enough to feed roughly 6.5 million hungry children for a year, according to figures from the World Food Programme....

[2ndDivisionVet]

As much as we spend on food stamps, WIC, school meals and the rest, there should be no hungry children in this country.

[Democrats hate too much]

The donors didnt do it due to their hatred toward children.

[digger48]

Those children wouldn’t be hungry if Hillary had her way and they were aborted

[Future Snake Eater]

They were trying to ensure far more children than that were fed!

/LibLogic

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Just think of all the poor TV talking heads it will feed!

[BenLurkin]

Doesn’t the daily caller understand?

Starving children must never be fed because the Democrat Party stays in power by promising to feed them.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

As much as we spend on food stamps, WIC, school meals and the rest, there should be no hungry children in this country.

For the most part the only children that are hungry are kids who's parents are not feeding them.

[TigersEye]

As any Democrat donor could tell you, 6 million hungry children can’t do anything for you ... and they’d just be hungry again next year.

[KarlInOhio]

Just a few of the eggs that had to be broken to make the Hillary presidential omelette.

Trump wasn't my first choice, but looking back on it I doubt that any of the Republicans in the campaign would have put up enough of a fight to even slow down the Hillary juggernaut.

[jonrick46]

Jill Stein’s recount effort could have fed lots of hungry kids too.

[Fiddlstix]

Starving children must never be fed because the Democrat Party stays in power by promising to feed them.

Bears Repeating!

[Army Air Corps]

Just think of all the poor TV talking heads it will feed!

"For just pennies a day, you can help Katie Couric have a hot, nourishing meal..."

[pieceofthepuzzle]

“Trump wasn’t my first choice, but looking back on it I doubt that any of the Republicans in the campaign would have put up enough of a fight to even slow down the Hillary juggernaut.”

Totally agree.

[bigbob]

$185 per kid per year? Well if so, Jill Stein could have fed 32 thousand. You’d think a physician she would want that more than stupid waste of time recounts.

[thinden]

So why do somthing so practical like this at home when obammy, moochelle & hildabeast can spend 100 ‘s of millions out of the state dept millenium fund to pay for rebuilding ME mosques & helping Morrocan school girls.

[GOPJ]

WE WANT HILLARY’S DONORS TO THROW THEIR MONEY AWAY ON CRAZY DEMOCRATS...

[SMGFan]

Keeping hearing those radios ads with kids saying 1 in 10(whatever number) kids in “America struggle with hunger” . “Foodcare “should have been #1 priority when BHO & Dems were in power. but we know they are not out to solve this “issue” .
BTW , how many children struggle with hunger in Russia?

[grey_whiskers]

...or, Michael Moore for a few days. /snark>