Posted on 01/23/2015 1:52:48 PM PST by entropy12
Florida Sen. Marco Rubio’s apparent decision to speed up his entry into the growing field of 2016 Republican presidential primary challengers is coming at the perfect time, as a new poll out Friday shows him moving into second place behind repeat candidate Mitt Romney.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
amnesty rubio?
that’d be awesome
/s
I thought Rubio is “evolving” from the amnesty thing :)
Rubio is about 1000x better than Romney or Bush. Sucks he wrong on immigration or he’d be a great candidate.
The establishment’s chosen squeaky clean young vice-presidential side-kick.
Any Americans running ? I didnt think so.,all paid off globalist.
Bush, Rubio,Romney 3 Obama’s. The fix is in boys.
Its lies promoting a liberal.
Real Slow news day.
I am pretty much over voting for the lesser evil.
***
Same here.
One of Rummy's Rules:
"Demographics is Destiny".
Rubio is vying for VP......he and Jeb, in a tight race.
soros is busy these days.
The GOPe would never go for Walker or Cruz.
Same here! And I will write him if his is not the nominee.
Same here! And I will write him in if he is is not the nominee.
That thought did cross my mind. Rubio looks much too young to be at the top of the ticket. He should attract lot of Hispanic votes, and is a much better speech maker than Romney.
Retread RomneyBot ???
More than 20+ years ago we were warned not to vote for your boy Willard as the supposed “lessor than” or “better than”
“(Romney) demonstrated very clearly in the debate last night that he has more in common with liberal Democrats than he does with Conservatives...Conservatives should not let their disgust and anger with Ted Kennedy’s big government liberal record lead them to support Mitt Romney”
Brent Bozell (UPI, October 26, 1994)
The debate referred to was the one for US Senator from MASS
Willard was running hard to the left of Ted Kennedy for that campaign..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9IJUkYUbvI&feature=related
and then in 2002 when Willard let it all hang out about his lifelong pro-abortion stance during the debate for MASS Gov
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_w9pquznG4
But because you are always entirely free of that possibility, the whole question is empty.
...if [such and such], I will vote Romney without hesitation.
Then you will vote to make leftism more powerful in both parties. And when the party moves hard left and enforces more tyranny, you will cry that you were "forced" to vote for it.
Wake up. It's a sucker's bet. You're voting for tyranny either way. Start voting ONLY for what you want to win. If you want Romney to win, that's fine -- just OWN IT.
And it is false.
Demography is pretense.
Morality is destiny.
In 2012, a clear majority of TX Hispanics voted for Cruz’s white liberal Democrat opponent, but Cruz did better with Hispanics than some Republicans have.
TX does not allow a write-in vote for President. Not tabulated if you write in someone in the margiun on a paper ballot
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.