Skip to comments.
Pissant Agrees to Return To FR, Head Sarah Palin Freeper Fundraiser
grey_whiskers ^
| 04-01-2011
| grey_whiskers
Posted on 03/31/2011 10:26:44 PM PDT by grey_whiskers
Pissant has just agreed to come back to Free Republic and spearhead what has been characterized as a massive fundraising effort, just in time for Sarah's planned announcement of her run for the Presidency.
TOPICS: Alaska; Campaign News; Polls
KEYWORDS: anothervanity; aprilfools; dancingongraves; dumbestjokeever; dumbpost; nottheundeadthread; palin; palinistas; palinvanity; palinworship; pdswishfulthinking; pissant; sarahpalin; stupidity; stupidpost; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 next last
To: mickie
That woman was a real piece of work.
121
posted on
04/01/2011 11:07:52 AM PDT
by
SoDak
To: NeoCaveman
Yes he did. Hate seeing he’s gone.
122
posted on
04/01/2011 11:13:19 AM PDT
by
SoDak
To: EveningStar
To: Lazlo in PA
I was on the thread that got him done in and it took me a couple reads to understand what his angle was on that last post.(I am a little dense sometimes)
Me, also. I didn't get it and thought he was zotted perhaps because he was told not to post on Palin threads for the obvious reasons. I had to look up who TB was. He/she obsession was in the 'over-the-top dangerous' category, IMO.
I had the impression that he was a female poster. Just some things said during our arguments. I could be wrong.
Years ago, I asked about the name, thinking she was an aunt - I got the impression he was a she, also. Much later on, I saw p*ss referred to his wife. So who knows, who cares.
To: jla
LOL...we can’t forget about Willie Green or Chet99 either! Their posts just became part of the landscape after a while...:)
125
posted on
04/01/2011 8:15:21 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(Capitalism is the Goose that lays The Golden Egg.)
To: wardaddy
PISSANT NEEDS TO GO ON THE LEFTS WEBSITES; does too much harm here.
To: presently no screen name
I understand your frustration. However, how would you be able to run a forum with all of the participants agreeing with each other? I would suggest that you look at the owners of this forum, and their dilemma with your proposition.
“Who has?”
There have been a few who have announced their intention to have an exploratory committee...whatever that is.
Gingrich has announced that he’s going to bypass the exploratory committee process. Pawlenty and, I believe, Bachmann have established exploratory committees.
I’m sure I’ve left someone out...but I don’t care. It’s way too early!
127
posted on
04/01/2011 11:49:36 PM PDT
by
dixiechick2000
("First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi)
To: backwoods-engineer; wardaddy; Travis McGee
“Travis McGee aka author Mathew Bracken is still here.”
How do you know him?
You should have been around for the bannings back then.
Then, you could speak to them.
128
posted on
04/01/2011 11:56:38 PM PDT
by
dixiechick2000
("First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi)
To: wardaddy; backwoods-engineer
I suspect he knows all of that. lol
129
posted on
04/01/2011 11:58:10 PM PDT
by
dixiechick2000
("First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi)
To: grey_whiskers
130
posted on
04/02/2011 6:28:17 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
To: dixiechick2000
How can you understand my frustration when I never said I was frustrated?
Why should I look to the owner of this site? How weird is that. He clearly states this is a conservative site - but, that doesn’t stop liberals from signing up for their own agenda. And then say we all don’t have to agree - laughable indeed. Just like rino’s with their ‘act’, also. A conservative knows their own.
To: JSDude1
she just isnt as conservative as a lot of people believe she is!
Who do you think is more conservative than Sarah?
To: presently no screen name
Bachmann, DeMint, Cain, (Pence-if he had decided to run).
133
posted on
04/02/2011 1:41:44 PM PDT
by
JSDude1
(December 18, 2010 the Day the radical homosexual left declared WAR on the US Military.)
To: JSDude1
DeMint, Cain, Pence- more conservative than Sarah? So it's really just a 'anybody but Sarah'. Duly noted.
To: presently no screen name
No, you nut, it’s really I just want a real conservative ans Sarah Palin isn’t it.
She’s pro homosexual, somewhat for foreign policy intervention, (pro-corporate taxes-as her stance of govern shows). Look I don’t hate Palin-but I hardly find her the most (or preferable) conservative of the bunch.
135
posted on
04/02/2011 4:31:34 PM PDT
by
JSDude1
(December 18, 2010 the Day the radical homosexual left declared WAR on the US Military.)
To: JSDude1
No, you nut,
Liberal tactic - name calling. And the rest of your message confirms it. Duly noted. Get lost.
To: grey_whiskers
Welcome back, Pissy!
To: grey_whiskers
Great!
To: presently no screen name
You didn’t have to use the word “frustrated” given your post.
“Me. Dissenting voices are everywhere all day long - at work, on CNN and every alphabet station, newspapers, MSM. I know of no conservative that enjoys the rantings of liberals - once in while to slap them down - is OK. And I’m reminded of dissenting voices when I buy gas, hear/read about unemployment, companies shutting down, doctors cutting back on staff bc of obamacare, etc. Why anyone here wants more dissent is weird. I hardly doubt the conservatives that are here - came here for dissenting voices.”
That is the post of someone who is truly frustrated. And, if further proof is needed...
“Why should I look to the owner of this site? How weird is that. He clearly states this is a conservative site - but, that doesnt stop liberals from signing up for their own agenda. And then say we all dont have to agree - laughable indeed. Just like rinos with their act, also. A conservative knows their own.”
I know that the owner of this site has his mission statement clearly stated on the homepage. No...that doesn’t stop liberals from signing up, and eventually being zotted. The mods are very good at keeping up with them. But, not all of those with whom you disagree are trolls, or liberals.
Suppose the nomination comes down to Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann. Do you not think there would be flames tossed everywhere between those two camps? Dang straight there would be flames flying all over the place!
I’ve seen too many elections transpire on FR not to believe that would be true.
I can tell you what I do during election season...I answer my pings. ;o)
139
posted on
04/02/2011 11:57:28 PM PDT
by
dixiechick2000
("First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi)
To: dixiechick2000
You didnt have to use the word frustrated given your post. That is the post of someone who is truly frustrated. And, if further proof is needed...
That's further proof of your mind reading. Don't attempt that with me/my words!!! You are applying YOUR reaction to a situation to me and/or what YOU want my reaction to be. You think I go around being frustrated. LOL. I ENJOY putting the commie libs or rino's in their place in my 'real life' and very effectively I might add. I don't do it because of frustration but because I so ENJOY putting my foot on the enemy and pressing down on it. And I do it when I feel like it because clueless fools are not worthy of my constant attention.
Do I enjoy being with my own kind more? YES! Do you think you might be able to stretch your mind into understanding the difference? After all, isn't that what you asked - who wants people around who only agree with you. (Not a new statement on FR and not surprising, either.) So stay focused and don't try to prove 'your point' with mind reading MY WORDS. Liberal tactic - 'you'll agree with me even if I have to put my words in your mouth'.
But, not all of those with whom you disagree are trolls, or liberals.
LOL! So there you are telling me how I should see things YOUR way. It's very easy to spot the most discreet troll - keep that in mind.
Do you not think there would be flames tossed everywhere between those two camps? Dang straight there would be flames flying all over the place!
Of course - that's the point - as long as there are trolls here and libs with conservative masks - there will always be dissension - that's what they are all about. DUH! Not rocket science you are presenting.
I can tell you what I do during election season...I answer my pings. ;o).
There is no doubt in my mind that's what you do. And in the meantime, you might want to work on your 'who wants a site where everyone agrees'. And back off of mind reading - if you want to at least 'appear' credible - that's friendly conservative advice.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson