Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems Win Enough Seats To Potentially Get Rid Of Electoral College
Trending Politics ^ | 11/6/2026 | Jake

Posted on 11/06/2026 8:51:10 AM PST by Signalman

Democrats’ midterm gains have opened a path to fundamentally changing how America elects its president, potentially locking in the national popular vote winner through an interstate agreement.Check Voting Info

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact would leave the Electoral College formally intact while changing how participating states award their votes. A member state could back one candidate at the ballot box and still hand every electoral vote to that candidate’s opponent.

That is because the agreement commits participating states to awarding their electoral votes to whoever wins the most votes nationwide, regardless of the outcome within their borders.

The compact activates only when its members collectively control at least 270 electoral votes, the majority needed to win the presidency.

Eighteen states and Washington, D.C., have enacted it, accounting for 222 electoral votes. Supporters need another 48.

Tuesday’s elections put that threshold within reach.

Democrats won unified control of state government in Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Those states hold a combined 50 electoral votes, enough to bring the compact to 272 if all four join.

Arizona holds another 11 electoral votes. Democrats were also projected to gain unified control there, although some legislative races remained uncalled Thursday evening. Adding all five states would push the compact to 283.Check Voting Info

But new Democratic majorities do not guarantee passage, and the party has previously failed to enact the agreement even when it controlled state government.

Michigan Democrats did not join during their 2023-24 trifecta, when they held the governorship and both legislative chambers.

Nevada’s then-Gov. Steve Sisolak, a Democrat, vetoed the proposal in 2019, citing concerns about the state’s influence in presidential elections.

Even if enough states sign on, a constitutional showdown could follow.

Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 allows states to appoint presidential electors “in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct.”

Supporters argue that provision gives states the authority to allocate their electoral votes based on the national count.

Opponents point to the Constitution’s Compact Clause, which restricts interstate agreements without congressional consent. Whether this compact requires that approval remains disputed.

Democratic control of Congress would not automatically resolve those questions or sideline President Donald Trump.Check Voting Info

The Congressional Research Service has explained that congressional consent to interstate compacts generally requires approval by both chambers and presentation to the president. If that process were required, Trump could veto the legislation. Overriding him would require two-thirds support in each chamber.

Senate Democrats could also face a Republican filibuster under current rules.

The political stakes are clear. George W. Bush won the presidency in 2000 while losing the national popular vote, and Trump did the same in 2016.

If implemented and upheld, the compact would commit a decisive Electoral College majority to the national popular vote winner, changing the presidential contest even in states that never joined.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: democrats; electoralcollege; trendingpolitics

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last

1 posted on 11/06/2026 8:51:10 AM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Signalman

No reason to vote if CA and NY chose the winner. America is so screwed.


2 posted on 11/06/2026 8:55:02 AM PST by cp124 (Bring back the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Ain’t communism wonderful. We will be Venezuela in 5 years.


3 posted on 11/06/2026 9:00:13 AM PST by bray (Thank God for Israel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray

Speaking of, bet you a dollar Maduro will eventually be back in power in Venezuela.


4 posted on 11/06/2026 9:00:58 AM PST by dfwgator ("I am Charlie Kirk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

They need to get the drug and child sex cartels moving again to fund their elections.


5 posted on 11/06/2026 9:03:53 AM PST by bray (Thank God for Israel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

https://youtu.be/CNdOsL4Xe7Q?t=64

Revolution Calling


6 posted on 11/06/2026 9:06:15 AM PST by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Nothing says “screw you” to a state’s voters than giving its electoral votes to the LOSING candidate in that state.


7 posted on 11/06/2026 9:08:42 AM PST by fwdude (Why is there a "far/radical right," but damned if they'll admit that there is a far/radical left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
Oh look, another one. Anddd copy paste…

The level of bullshit and pearl clutching in these repeated threads on this subject are ridiculous. The electoral college is going nowhere regardless of the fear porn seminar posters. Post another 500 times about it. The answer won’t change.

8 posted on 11/06/2026 9:09:12 AM PST by Frank Drebin (And don't ever let me catch you guys in America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

More here:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4401887/posts

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4402028/posts

😉👍


9 posted on 11/06/2026 9:11:41 AM PST by rktman (Patriotism not 'hateriotism' !. Enlisted USN 1967 proudly. 🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

“Potentially”. Such a compact would only mean something were it to compel a state to cast its electoral votes contrary to the majority vote of that state. Not only would that be politically unpopular in such a state but it would face obvious, substantial legal challenges under state constitutions. So there are legal experts saying this would be valid under the federal constitution. But even if true, and that is not certain, there would be plenty of state level challenges.

But if the Dems keep Congress and elect a Dem president in 2028, they could simply pass a law, no super majority required, to admit Puerto Rico as a state. For that matter, they could admit Ukraine or Mexico or anywhere else. There’s no limit to this power. It’s a time bomb built into the Constitution.


10 posted on 11/06/2026 9:11:47 AM PST by Stingray51 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
Nothing says “screw you” to a state’s voters than giving its electoral votes to the LOSING candidate in that state.

Had the "compact" been in effect in 2024, do you seriously believe California would have given 54 EV to Trump/Vance?

Like a lot of Leftist things, if this ever happens, it will only work in one direction.

11 posted on 11/06/2026 9:14:37 AM PST by Jim Noble (Assez de mensonges et des phrases)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Had the "compact" been in effect in 2024, do you seriously believe California would have given 54 EV to Trump/Vance?

Oh, I know! They would call an emergency legislative session to reverse their "compact" legislation before certification, pass it before lunch, and vote on it before 4:00. And the governor would stay over that evening to sign it.

12 posted on 11/06/2026 9:16:47 AM PST by fwdude (Why is there a "far/radical right," but damned if they'll admit that there is a far/radical left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bray

Well, if this stolen election is allowed to stand we pretty much already are Venezuela or Brazil.


13 posted on 11/06/2026 9:21:34 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Frank Drebin

Agree 100%. EC is not going anywhere. Takes majority of Congress and majority of States to pass.

People need to calm down and focus.


14 posted on 11/06/2026 9:21:47 AM PST by Hoboto (I blame Hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Presumably they would attempt this by passing a law the president could veto. If the veto were over-ridden that law would be subject to SCOTUS review.


15 posted on 11/06/2026 9:30:28 AM PST by muir_redwoods (You choose; a world without dogs or a world without muslims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cp124
No reason to vote if CA and NY chose the winner.

It appears to me that 2028 may be the last free election in USA. We won't bother to show up to vote after that.

16 posted on 11/06/2026 9:34:49 AM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
If the veto were over-ridden that law would be subject to SCOTUS review.

For now, correct.

There are no guarantees after 2028.

17 posted on 11/06/2026 9:35:29 AM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Now you know why Biden’s handlers opened the border and brough in 30+ million illegal aliens.
And why Democrats were freaking out about deportations.

19 million additional Democrats voters from 2022 to 2026.

Republicans got complacent after the 2024 election.

Trump, Noem and Mullin failed to deport everyone.
They failed to debank illegal aliens.

Thune failed to secure our elections.

There is no coming back from this.


18 posted on 11/06/2026 9:47:28 AM PST by captaincaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cp124

I wonder how many states would secede if they try.


19 posted on 11/06/2026 9:49:13 AM PST by nonliberal (Pinochet did nothing wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: captaincaveman
There is no coming back from this.

All we had to do was to hold on and win the White House in 2028.

Now it's much harder for a Republican to win.

It's likely that AOC/El-Sayed will be the ticket.

20 posted on 11/06/2026 9:49:28 AM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson