Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 10/17/2026 1:26:39 AM PDT by SaveFerris
HOW COULD THEY DO THIS?
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
From what I’ve been able to uncover, it’s the Seattle Public Schools in Washington and Las Cruces Public Schools in New Mexico.
Thank you for updating the thread
Direct Link to the video
https://youtube.com/shorts/tdFAh1ygIyU
I used 2 different lists on this
This madness is unbelievable but
Isaiah 5:20 and Days of Lot (tagline)
We’re gonna to need more re-education camps.
AI Overview:
Documented Cases of School Distribution
• King County, Washington (Seattle Public Schools): Internal emails obtained via public records requests in late 2025 revealed that the district’s Health Education Office partnered with Seattle Children’s Hospital. The hospital supplied chest binders, Transtape, and other gender-affirming items for “Community Health Lockers” available to students at high schools, such as Garfield High School.
• Doña Ana County, New Mexico (Las Cruces Public Schools): In 2024, a public records request showed that Centennial High School used an $10,000 external grant from the national LGBTQ+ youth non-profit It Gets Better to purchase over 200 chest binders for its campus clothing closet, which was open to all students.
• Lincoln County, Maine (Great Salt Bay Community School): While not a district-wide policy, this school became the focus of national media and a federal lawsuit after a school social worker provided a chest binder directly to a 13-year-old student without the parents’ knowledge or permission. A federal judge dismissed the initial parent lawsuit in 2024, ruling that the parent failed to establish constitutional violations that held the school board legally liable.
Educational Lessons vs. Distribution
In other areas, chest binders have appeared in the news regarding school lessons rather than physical distribution. For example, in Montgomery County, Maryland, parents raised concerns after a middle school showed an instructional video to 11- and 12-year-old students demonstrating how to safely wear chest binders as part of Transgender Awareness Week. The school district defended the lesson as an effort to foster respect and empathy.
And more Bible teaching
and prayers 🛐🙏✝️
AI Overview:
Clarifying the Source of These Kits
Rather than government bodies, grassroots non-profit organizations independently assemble and distribute these care packages, which they typically refer to as “GENDER-AFFIRMING KITS”:
• The Queer Trans Project: A Florida-based, trans-led non-profit organization that ships free, customized “BUILD-A-QUEER Kits” to individuals across all 50 states.
• Massachusetts Transgender Political Coalition: Operates the GEAR Program to distribute free GENDER-EXPRESSION products within Massachusetts.
• I Support The Girls: Operates the SLASH Kits program to deliver comfort items and basic apparel to TRANS and NON-BINARY individuals facing housing insecurity.
What Do These Packages Contain?
These kits do not contain medical devices, surgical equipment, or prescription medications. Instead, they consist of over-the-counter apparel, cosmetics, and hygiene supplies used for personal grooming and styling, including:
• Chest binders, compression underwear, and tucking gaffs
• Silicone breast forms and pocketed bras
• Cosmetics, makeup bundles, and skincare products
• Body-safe tape
I saw a HS aged guy...the high school guy beard tipped me off...at the grocery store a couple of times. He was wearing a yellow sundress. Tbe cashier just went about her business with a dumb smile plastered on her face.
Planned Parenthood can’t sell them abortions anymore so they have gone back to going sterilization.
WOW
🔝🔝
COPILOT: If you're referring to cases where people were arrested or threatened with arrest for handing out Gideon Bibles outside schools, there have been some notable incidents, but the legality depended heavily on where they were standing and local circumstances.
For example, in Florida in 2007, members of The Gideons International distributing Bibles on a public sidewalk outside a school were threatened with arrest, and two were reportedly arrested. A subsequent federal court ruling allowed the activity to continue while the case proceeded, and the distributing group argued that handing out Bibles on a public sidewalk was protected by the First Amendment. [adflegal.org], [adflegal.org]
In the United States, the general legal principle is:
There have also been many disputes over Gideons distributing Bibles near schools, with some advocacy groups arguing such distributions are inappropriate or unconstitutional when they occur on school grounds. [ffrf.org], [ffrf.org]
ME: how about being IN school giving them away?
COPILOT: In U.S. public schools, giving away Bibles inside the school during instructional time is generally treated very differently than handing them out on a public sidewalk.
A few principles that courts have often recognized:
Historically, Gideons distributed Bibles in some public schools, but many districts later discontinued the practice after legal challenges arguing that school-facilitated distribution could be perceived as government endorsement of religion.
The result is that in many places today:
From a Christian perspective, people disagree sharply on whether such restrictions are necessary neutrality or hostility toward religion. Legally, however, public schools are generally on firmer ground regulating distribution inside the school than they are regulating speech on a public sidewalk outside it.
COPILOT: I can see why you're drawing a connection, but it's helpful to separate a few different questions:
Reasonable people can disagree on #2, but #1 and #3 are often more complicated than social media or headlines make them seem.
For example, some schools have hosted drag-related events, invited performers to read books, or included discussions of gender identity in curricula. Critics argue this exposes children to ideas they consider inappropriate or ideologically driven. Supporters argue the goal is inclusion, anti-bullying, or exposure to different people.
As for outcomes, there are competing predictions:
From a Christian perspective, many believers would say parents, not schools, should be the primary moral and religious educators of children. Others would add that public schools should avoid promoting any particular moral, religious, or ideological worldview beyond basic civic principles.
One thing worth noting: concern about a school activity does not automatically mean the activity is unlawful, and legality does not automatically settle whether it is wise or morally right. Those are separate debates.
If your concern is specifically, "Why are religious activities often restricted while some controversial cultural or identity-related activities are permitted?" that's a question many parents and religious groups have raised. The answer usually given by courts is that public schools are constrained by constitutional rules about government involvement with religion in ways that do not apply identically to every other kind of speech. Whether those distinctions are applied fairly is itself a matter of ongoing public debate.
It’s not exactly clear......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.