Lindsay Clancy Juror Breaks His Silence - "I Did Not Lie on the Questionnaire" He Told Me Everything

Youtube ^ | 09 14 2026 | Fugative TV

[yesthatjallen]

"Lindsay Clancy Juror Breaks His Silence - "I Did Not Lie on the Questionnaire" He Told Me EverythingIn this world exclusive, the holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial called me and told me everything. Michael says he did NOT lie on his jury questionnaire, and according to him, other jurors supported Lindsay Clancy behind closed doors.I break down what he told me about the questionnaire, the divorce papers, what NBC left out, and the court documents in this Lindsay Clancy update. As always, I'm giving you his words and the paperwork side by side so you guys can decide for yourselves.

This is his account of what happened in that jury room during the Lindsay Clancy trial. Let me know what you guys think in the comments."

---

TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: holdout; juror; lindsayclancy

[yesthatjallen]

The video is 20 mins. long.

[kiryandil]

How surprising.

The Mainstream Media is lying like rugs, yet again.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Summary Link

Detailed summary of the YouTube video “Lindsay Clancy Juror Breaks His Silence - ‘I Did Not Lie on the Questionnaire’ He Told Me Everything” (Fugitive TV / Ray Marcel, ~20 minutes, published around September 15–16, 2026).

This is a true-crime update video by host Ray Marcel on the Fugitive TV channel. It centers on an exclusive phone interview (about one hour) Marcel conducted that morning with Michael Desronvil (also referred to as Michael Desonville or Michael P. Desronvil), the identified Black male holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial. The trial of Clancy (who admitted strangling her three young children in 2023 but pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity) ended in a mistrial after the jury deadlocked (reportedly 11-1). Marcel presents Desronvil’s account, court documents, and context to counter media narratives about the juror’s background and the deliberations. He emphasizes providing both the juror’s words and paperwork so viewers can form their own conclusions. Desronvil is not appearing on camera yet due to ongoing harassment but may do so later.

Background on Marcel and the case

Marcel introduces himself as a former fugitive who lived under different names abroad before turning himself in. His channel focuses on true crime, missing persons, and deeper looks at cases than mainstream media. He notes that Desronvil’s name was doxed online (on X/Twitter) after the mistrial, leading to intense scrutiny and harassment. Marcel researched the juror’s background himself (rather than amplifying the doxing), emailed him days earlier, and discussed prior videos. Desronvil liked Marcel’s approach of researching rather than following a narrative and reached out.

Desronvil’s 2021 background and divorce (countering media reports)

Marcel addresses reports (particularly from NBC Boston) about Desronvil’s past, which included domestic violence allegations and a restraining order. He argues the reporting was incomplete or one-sided.

• Desronvil filed for divorce first (March 3, 2022), citing an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage (under “1B,” indicating the spouse did not agree or want the divorce). The key incident date referenced is September 25, 2021.
• His ex-wife filed a counterclaim later (May 10, 2022), also citing cruel and abusive treatment on the same September 25, 2021 date (and other occasions).
• According to Desronvil, the marriage was essentially “fraudulent” because his then-wife was not a U.S. citizen and was in the country illegally (he claims he did not initially know this). Marcel shows a letter from USCIS dated around April 1, 2021, denying Desronvil’s Form I-130 petition for alien relative (spouse classification).
• Marcel highlights the ex-wife’s reported statement to NBC Boston that she chose not to go to court because she did not want to risk losing custody of her child—something he found odd if she were purely a victim. He suggests her immigration status may explain reluctance to fully contest matters in court.
• Regarding the incident involving his nephew (allegations of assault): Desronvil says not everything reported is true, the full truth will come out, the nephew is 6'2" while he is 5'7", and he was not convicted of anything from 2021. He maintains none of this personal history should matter to his jury service or the Clancy case.
• Marcel questions who the “family members” interviewed for the NBC report were; Desronvil believes it was likely his ex-sister-in-law (mother of the nephew, and correction in the video notes it is his brother’s ex-wife), who would not be favorable. He says the family members referenced are not people he is close to.

Marcel displays summons documents confirming Desronvil’s jury selection (summoned for July 22, 2026, juror number/badge 253 matching the questionnaire).

Jury questionnaire and selection

Desronvil firmly states he did not lie on the jury questionnaire. He checked the box indicating he had been arrested and described what happened. He was questioned by the prosecutor on the stand and still selected. Marcel presents this as evidence against claims of concealment.Account of the jury deliberationsDesronvil’s version of the jury room (which Marcel notes he was not present for, so this is the juror’s account only):

• On day one: 8 jurors for not guilty (regarding Clancy / supporting the insanity defense), 2 for guilty, and 2 undecided.
• The group of 8 who favored not guilty felt (to Desronvil) like “activists.” They daily tried to convince the others that Clancy was not guilty.
• It eventually came down to Desronvil and one other female juror (who has done an anonymous interview without showing her face) holding out for guilty. At the last moment, she “caved” and switched (he is unsure if due to pressure).
• Desronvil remained firm: based on the evidence presented in court, he believed Clancy was guilty, was not insane at the time, and knew what she was doing.
• He explained the water-bottle demonstration (tying string/exercise band around a water bottle): it was to illustrate/set an example of how the string was used on the children’s necks. He says he explained this and that some public accounts of it are incomplete, half-truths, or lies.
• He feels some of what is being said about him is inaccurate.

Harassment, politics, and broader comments

While on the phone with Marcel, Desronvil reported a man “creeping around” his home (appearing to do work but not actually working)—part of ongoing issues since his name was released. Family members (including his brother) have also faced people near their homes and feel unsafe.

Desronvil (described by Marcel as well-spoken, nice, kind, and Catholic) believes he may be targeted partly because he is a Black Republican with conservative views, while many other jurors and media lean Democratic/left. Marcel (who identifies as independent and focused on common sense) notes this could explain some of the intensity of the backlash and the surprise that a Black juror held out for guilt. He criticizes the doxing, background digging, and harassment of jurors as damaging to the system—people may fear serving or standing firm in the future regardless of their vote. He argues personal history from 2021 (especially without conviction) should be irrelevant to the Clancy deliberations and that reporting should have been fuller and fairer.

Closing

Marcel reiterates that everything shared comes from Desronvil and the documents. He plans a future interview (on camera or phone). He invites comments (agreement or disagreement), praises Desronvil for standing on the evidence as he saw it, and ends with a call to look out for one another. A pinned correction notes the sister-in-law reference.

Overall tone and framing: Marcel positions this as a “world exclusive” giving the holdout’s side against incomplete or narrative-driven mainstream coverage (especially NBC Boston). He stresses integrity in journalism, privacy for jurors, and letting viewers decide based on the presented words and paperwork. The video includes on-screen documents (summons, divorce filings, immigration letter) for verification. Viewer comments (visible in related results) largely express support for the juror and criticism of the harassment.

Note: This summary is based on the video’s content and available transcript. Accounts of the deliberations differ from those of other jurors who have spoken publicly (who described the holdout as unyielding despite acknowledging some reasonable doubt, and criticized aspects of his behavior). The video focuses solely on Desronvil’s perspective via Marcel.

[Yardstick]

His being Catholic and conservative means the left is going to go scorched earth on him. It will bring out the Antifa types. He’s going to need security.

[Alberta's Child]

If what he’s saying about the jury questionnaire is truthful, then my original assessment was probably correct. As soon as the reports of his “criminal” background surfaced, I suspected the following:

1. He answered the questionnaire truthfully.
2. The defense wanted a “criminal” on the jury, thinking he’d be reflexively opposed to the prosecution.
3. The prosecution left him on the jury because in leftist Massachusetts there was no way in hell they’d remove a black man with a “challenging” life story from a jury.

[Sacajaweau]

He was arrested but the charges were dropped. That makes the arrest moot.

[muir_redwoods]

Let me summarize. A man with a few personal and marital issues acted responsibly and rationally while serving on a jury and surrounded by insane harridans and two beta males.

I think that’s it.

[MMusson]

Either Women are strong, independent, competent people or
they are Hysterical creatures who are victims of their hormones.

One or the other. It cannot be both.

[spincaster]

If woman are that unstable and capable of uncontrollable Hysteria
at any moment, they definitely should not be allowed to vote.

[GreatRoad]

Thank you for posting. Reddington was wrong for calling out this juror and needs to be sanctioned or sued. Protecting the jury system is fundamental.

[SisterK]

this certainly has flushed out the demoniacs
separating the sheep from the goats

[dforest]

In this video, the question was answered as to why this juror’s ex spouse told the media that she did not want to press charges on this guy. Back in the day, during their divorce, she figured she would lose custody of their kids.
She is an illegal Haitian. Probably married him to stay in the US.

These scumbags. Clancy hags, and their media cohorts, left out and embellished all the crap they released on him.

Some people need to be sued.

[Ezekiel]

this certainly has flushed out the demoniacs separating the sheep from the goats

A water analogy certainly flows with the interesting name:

Michael DESRONvil (also referred to as Michael Desonville or Michael P. Desronvil)...

... destroyer of worlds. Height: 5'7"

Perhaps some might even bristle at the notion that a Catholic man would be selected to stand up alone as the representative for the people of truth.

Yet, for those expecting Central Casting to provide the line-up for Mission-from-God-level rolls, Jesse already had seven strapping warrior sons to choose from, for example. No need to scare up some little guy who is out in a field with the sheep.

The world is full of surprises.

The surname DESRONVIL has its origins in France, dating back to the early 17th century. It is believed to have originated from the French word "desronviller," which means "to remove the brambles or thorns." This suggests that the name may have been given to someone who cleared land for agricultural or construction purposes.

https://namecensus.com/last-names/desronvil-surname-popularity/

[Ezekiel]

re: destroyer(s) of worlds

I should have included for those who may not be familiar, or wouldn't think to check:

The U.S. Navy acronym for a destroyer squadron is DESRON..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destroyer_squadron

"tool": Join the Navi, see the world.

[Presbyterian Reporter]

“”””According to Desronvil, the marriage was essentially “fraudulent” because his then-wife was not a U.S. citizen and was in the country illegally (he claims he did not initially know this). Marcel shows a letter from USCIS dated around April 1, 2021, denying Desronvil’s Form I-130 petition for alien relative (spouse classification).
Marcel highlights the ex-wife’s reported statement to NBC Boston that she chose not to go to court because she did not want to risk losing custody of her child—something he found odd if she were purely a victim. He suggests her immigration status may explain reluctance to fully contest matters in court.””””

---

Assuming this is true, the Lefties will have another cause to pursue.

Namely, illegal aliens in the USA need to be a protected class because they are subject to criminal acts and are afraid to pursue judicial relief.

[Presbyterian Reporter]

I did a Google search of the name Michael Desronvil.

There are hundreds of Tiktok, Instagram, and like website postings with his name.

I did not see any mainstream media postings with his name.

A few days ago I wrote on FR that it would not take much to locate Michael Desronvil since NBC reported he had a court case in 2021 and currently was being sued by his landlord for rent.

[yesthatjallen]

I don’t know his name but his name is known. He’s been outed. Most mainstream sources aren’t reporting it but social media is.

[Mr. K]

Judge instruction to the jury need to include “YOU ARE NOT HERE TO MAKE A STATEMENT- you are here to decide THIS case”

This reminds me of the idiotic McDonals hot coffee stupidity. The jurors gave her a ridiculoud amount af moeny to send a message that “the coffee is too hot out there”

Nevermind that the dumb*ss spilled hot coffee on hereself, knowing she bought.. HOT COFFEE! It was not like it was a surprise to her.

I know the cases are not comprable- I just think that was when all this “send a message” started creeping in to court

[telescope115]

I’m gonna watch it later!

[TTFX]

Thanks for the summary.