Posted on 09/05/2026 1:41:53 PM PDT by Red Badger
Some intriguing information has come out regarding the feelings of the female jurors after they failed in their quest to let Lindsay Clancy get away with murdering her three little children. And it's safe to say they were not happy.
As The Gateway Pundit reported, Judge William Sullivan officially declared a mistrial today in the Clancy murder trial while defense attorney Kevin Reddington melted down.
Reddington later asked the Massachusetts Supreme Court for relief, which was denied.
This was all made possible allegedly due to one brave male juror who refused to give in to bullying from both Clancy's defense team and the female jurors.
Following Judge Sullivan's declaration of a mistrial, CNN's Jean Casarez shared some very interesting details regarding the reactions of the female jurors, all of whom wanted Clancy to walk.
First, all of the jurors were tense as the judge spoke. One female was in despair as she shook her head, while another angrily clenched her fists.
Another woman was so distraught that she could not open her eyes.
Casarez then shared that another dismayed female juror pursed her lips while another nodded her head.
WATCH:
Female jurors in the Lindsay Clancy trial were in total shambles as the judge declared a mistrial thanks to a lone holdout juror.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
To the one man who stood up for the babies....Thank You. Just plain common sense.
I hope the prosecution learned from this first trial, and will act accordingly during the 2nd.
This is the OJ jury fiasco all over agsin.........
Did they act like they shouldn’t be voting?
I really think the first line in a trial should be a local AI system. Only feed it the relevant statutes and laws and also the evidence presented by the Defense and Prosecution.
Was a crime committed?
Did the Defendant commit that crime?
What is the verdict?
Have a human judge review for gross errors, hallucinations, or miscarriages of justice. If the judge disagree with the AI, have the judge write out a detailed rebuttal and carry that to a retrial.
I don’t think our current crop of humans can handle the task of serving on a jury. Machines can do it without emotion or prejudice.
Talk about evil! Thank you to the hero who seems to have been the ONLY ONE who followed the instructions.
That witch had no business being on the jury.
The woke, hand-selected jurors were supposed to come up with a specific verdict and one juror rose above that. And they were all PO’ed.
I hope the prosecution learned from this first trial, and will act accordingly during the 2nd.
- - - - - - -
11-1 is a big loss. My guess is she’ll never be sentenced.
That used to be true. Computers are so advanced now they have developed biases and some can be racist!........
Exactly. This tribal. A woman went on trial for murder and other wimmen circled the wagons to protect her from the evil menfolk. How dare they try to prosecute her!
Cue up the little punkette: “How dare you!”
I have not been followed this case but it seems that there is no dispute of material fact that this woman willfully strangled her three children to death
What is wrong with our world ?
No one lost anything. The prosecution CANNOT have a majority woman jury if there is a redo. That was foolish. I can see why they thought it would work, though. They might have thought the women would sympathize with the murdered kids. Whoops. No, they selected a bunch of witches instead
That fact was never in dispute. The trial was to determine if she should be held accountable for it or be excused......
EVIL WOMEN!!! Thank GOD there was ONE REAL MAN....the other 2 ARE EVIL ALSO!
thanks for your post... I had it backwards, I thought they all wanted her in prison and one guy kept saying no.
I was on a jury once a on liberal guy couldn’t get reasonable doubt confused with perfect proof. took us all a day and a half to explain it to him.
Not a bad idea considering the quality of people in this country!!
Nodding (not shaking) her head “no”, gazing down with her eyes closed: I miss the English language we used to share.
Try to keep women off the next jury. Even the ones who claim to be impartial.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.