Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 07/17/2026 2:55:19 PM PDT by nickcarraway
A prehistoric burial near Stonehenge long known as the “Shaman of Upton Lovell” has been identified as a woman’s, overturning a belief that shaped archaeological interpretation for more than 200 years.
Ancient DNA analysis revealed that the individual buried near Stonehenge about 4,000 years ago was biologically female. The finding challenges one of Britain’s best-known prehistoric identifications and is prompting researchers to rethink the roles women held in Early Bronze Age society.
Researchers examined surviving skeletal remains, including fragments of the skull, a tooth and a foot bone. DNA testing identified XX chromosomes, confirming the individual was female. The findings, which will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, provide the first conclusive genetic evidence identifying the burial.
Grave goods point to a master goldworker
The woman’s grave contained an exceptional collection of objects linked to goldworking. Among them were a finely crafted battle axe made from dolerite brought from present-day Northumberland and stone tools used to smooth and polish gold. The presence of materials transported over long distances suggests access to extensive trade networks.
Earlier analysis of the grave goods showed that many of the objects were working tools rather than simple ceremonial offerings. Cups made from fossil sponges were likely used to prepare adhesives, while battle axes had been adapted for hammering and burnishing gold.
Together, the artifacts point to a highly skilled goldworker whose expertise would have been rare during the Early Bronze Age. The skeleton also offers clues about her life. Researchers estimate she was older than 45 when she died and suffered from arthritis in her right wrist. The condition is consistent with years of repetitive metalworking.
Artifacts suggest a ceremonial role
Other objects in the grave suggest she may also have held an important ceremonial role. A cloak decorated with perforated animal bones would have produced a distinctive rattling sound while its wearer walked or danced.
Archaeologists also found a pouch decorated with boar tusks. Together, these items suggest the woman may have participated in religious rituals while serving as a respected craftswoman.
Another woman was buried beside her in the same barrow with jewelry made from polished slate. The burial mound overlooks a valley leading toward Stonehenge. Researchers believe the route may have been used to transport valuable materials and prestige goods to the ceremonial landscape, helping explain why objects made from distant materials were placed in the grave.
Modern science rewrites the burial’s history The burial was first excavated in 1803 and was identified as male based solely on the size and shape of the bones. That interpretation remained accepted for more than two centuries until modern DNA analysis proved otherwise.
The discovery highlights how advances in archaeogenetics are reshaping the study of prehistoric Britain. By combining genetic evidence with archaeological analysis, researchers have rewritten the story of one of the country’s most famous Bronze Age burials and provided new evidence that women could hold prominent positions as both skilled artisans and ceremonial leaders.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
How do we know he didn’t just identify as a man?
Exactly.
Good, good. Science is relying on DNA to determine the sex of an individual.
He could still be African black too.
Aren’t they calling them “cisgender birthing persons” these days?
“ DNA testing identified XX chromosomes, confirming the individual was female.”
__________
Now do Michelle Obama.
We had a service tech come to the house recently. The company emailed a picture of the guy and said Richard is on THEIR way. Confusing times.
“ Ancient DNA analysis revealed that the individual buried near Stonehenge about 4,000 years ago was biologically female.”
Wow!
What are the odds if that?
50-50
English people have gone insane.
My God, this changes everything! /s
So a shawoman then.
“What are the odds if that?”
50/50 would be true if it was a random grave. But that are the odds of a female shaman? I would have guessed about zero in that era.
Gonna need a really old biologist to figure out all this.
Did the DNA also show that she was gay, transgender, bisexual and a witch?
Not the witch part. The only test for a witch is does she weigh the same as a duck?
I know. My comment was a joke to point out the silliness of this article.
What are the odds this body was actually a “shaman”? Probably a lot less than 50-50.
Did women move those stones?
Oops…ya got me!
Really? Were there anything other than "biological" females
females in existence then or at any other time in history?
He could still be African black too.
*****************************
You’re closeer to the truth than you think. What excited the researchers mnore than the fact that it was a woman, was that she had DARK skin. So they will probably do a Cheddar Man and claim she was black.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.