Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 04/03/2026 2:08:55 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
A New York Times headline that laughably mischaracterized NATO as “A North American Treaty Organization” drew widespread scorn on Friday.
The glaring mangling of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s name quickly spread across X.
Within minutes, a post pointing out the egregious error drew a wave of ridicule, disbelief and anger — much of it aimed not just at the mistake itself, but at what users framed as broader failures in mainstream media.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
It’s the NYT way ....
Forget it, Jake ... it's the New York Times.
Fire the copy editor.
On second thought, keep him for future amusement.
It HAS to say “American” instead of “Atlantic”. “A North Atlantic Treaty Organization without America?” title doesn’t show how witty the NYT is.
It’s kinda hard to argue NATO’s primary purpose when you don’t get the function of its military alliance correct.
And that's the way it should be. Bilateral Agreement instead of an alliance system like NATO where you have countries getting away with not having to contribute.
So confusing for the dozens of people who read the NYT.
what? it’s not a traditional Japanese food made from fermented soybeans??
Whenever I read about the NYT I am reminded of Pulitzer Prize winner Walter Duranty informing the US State Department that all of his correspondence were cleared by Stalin in accordance with an agreement with the Soviet Union. Kliefoth Memo: https://www.garethjones.org/Embassy-1.pdf. He was one of the reasons Americans knew nothing of the Holodomor.
I don’t know if it is he or some other NYT correspondent who’s buried in the Kremlin Wall in Moscow.
Forget it Jake, Its the NYT.
Any number of commentators from conservative sources could have made that obviously sarcastic twist as well.
How many times are acronyms given novel names here? Every day...
c’mon, just because fact-checkers are from somalia, is no reason yo complain about facts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.