Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator Paul introduces the End Welfare for Non-Citizens Act
paul.senate.gov ^ | Jan 16 | Sen. Paul

Posted on 01/16/2026 7:00:30 AM PST by RandFan

@SenRandPaul

I just introduced the End Welfare for Non-Citizens Act to ensure taxpayer-funded benefits are reserved for Americans. This bill ends federal funding for programs like TANF, Medicaid, and SNAP for illegal immigrants, refugees, asylees, and new entrants.

A recent massive fraud scheme—estimated by federal prosecutors to reach $9 billion, shows exactly why we must do more to protect American taxpayers from theft and abuse. Safeguarding public funds is more urgent than ever.

The fraud involved dozens of individuals—many from Minnesota’s Somali community, who set up businesses and non-profits claiming to provide housing, food, or healthcare assistance, then billed federally funded state programs for services that were never delivered.

Nearly $700 million in cash was also flown out of Minneapolis airport by Somali couriers in 2024 and 2025 alone; averaging almost $1 million a day. This demands further investigation for ties to the rampant fraud.

I’ve been clear on this from day one, and the record backs it up. I’ve consistently pushed for accountability and real results, and we have the receipts to prove it.

Congress must protect hardworking Americans from fraud. Taxpayer dollars shouldn’t be stolen or sent to noncitizens, especially while our nation is deep in debt. It’s time to put Americans first and crack down on waste and abuse.

(Excerpt) Read more at paul.senate.gov ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: 5thcolumonfr; aliens; americafirst; crookedopportunist; crookedsenator; endwelfare4randpaul; frtraitorslist; iranfan; randfan; randfans; randpaulisatraitor; randpaulisgay; randspam; randstanding; snap; welfare; weloverandagain; whataphony; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: RandFan

There are already laws on the books that preclude new immigrants, legal and illegal, from receiving government benefits.

But the government passes laws that the people demand to show they are actually working - then they just ignore their own laws
or build loopholes into the laws they pass.

So trying to pass a new law is basically for show and not necessary.

What is needed is the backbone to enforce existing laws.

Legal immigrants are required by federal law to have a sponsor who agrees to provide for their welfare if necessary.

Illagal aliens are illegal by definitiion (Duh!) and by law not entitled to any government aid other than a fast trip
out of the USA.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

U.S. law, primarily through the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA), requires most intending immigrants
to have a financial sponsor who signs a legally binding Affidavit of Support (Form I-864), promising to maintain the immigrant at 125% of federal
poverty guidelines to prevent them from becoming a public charge.

The sponsor, usually the family member or employer filing the petition, enters into a contract with the government, ensuring they’ll repay certain
public benefits if the immigrant uses them, with responsibilities lasting until the immigrant becomes a citizen or accrues 40 work quarters (about 10 years)

Immigration and Nationality Act: Sections 212(a)(4) and 213A establish the public charge rule and Affidavit of Support requirements.


41 posted on 01/16/2026 7:39:09 AM PST by Iron Munro (Pamela Geller: Where Islam dominates democracy and non-muslims perish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

This alone will cause millions of illegals to self-deport.

Save money BY deporting illegals. What’s not to love?


42 posted on 01/16/2026 7:40:37 AM PST by fwdude (Why is there a "far/radical right," but damned if they'll admit that there is a far/radical left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

Spend five minutes in any ER in this country and you’ll see the law flouted routinely.

I will say since Trump is back in the illegal alien traffic in my hospitals ER has dropped significantly.

And this is in southern NJ.


43 posted on 01/16/2026 7:41:53 AM PST by jmacusa ( Liberals. Too stupid to be idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

This is going to require polish.

Green card holders are to be excluded from the restrictions?

A man marrying a foreign lady, bringing her to America, getting her a green card, popping out a couple of American children and then the guy turns into an alcoholic and divorce follows.

Is she cut off?


44 posted on 01/16/2026 7:42:39 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

What is needed is the backbone to enforce existing laws.


a republic is a nation of laws and we are all equal before it.

unfortunately there are so many laws today, we are all guilty of something .................................


45 posted on 01/16/2026 7:42:50 AM PST by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued, but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

“they won’t like it” which hints now many are on the take.


46 posted on 01/16/2026 7:43:27 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: damper99

Come on.. .He deserves an ‘attaboy’ for this

Rand also if you look has a flawless record on spending

The debate and vote will be very informative, no’?


47 posted on 01/16/2026 7:43:56 AM PST by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Owen

No polish needed. Is she a citizen? No? Then she gets nothing. She can get a job like the millions of other working mothers who pay taxes. Work and child support. Like most single mothers. Or she can go back where she came from. I didn’t bring her here and it shouldn’t be up to me to support her.


48 posted on 01/16/2026 7:50:51 AM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
how about ending free emergency medical care for illegal aliens?

I would not support that. I support: medically stabilize, arrest, deport.

49 posted on 01/16/2026 7:56:35 AM PST by libertylover (The HBM (Has Been Media) is almost all AGENDA-DRIVEN and HATE-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

How about the “Make Crime Illegal Again Act”?


50 posted on 01/16/2026 7:56:51 AM PST by Fresh Wind (I voted for Trump the Fighter, not a wussified wimp!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Yes, AGREE with all you said.


51 posted on 01/16/2026 8:01:39 AM PST by Old Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

“ If you immigrate to the US you get 1 year of free stuff then you work or get deported.”

No. My ancestors didn’t get jack squat.

L


52 posted on 01/16/2026 8:02:10 AM PST by Lurker ( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Note Article 23.

Quotes from the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees:

Article 31. - Refugees unlawfully in the country of refuge

1. The Contracting States shall not impose penalties, on account of their illegal entry or presence, on refugees who, coming directly from a territory where their life or freedom was threatened in the sense of article 1, enter or are present in their territory without authorization, provided they present themselves without delay to the authorities and show good cause for their illegal entry or presence.
2. The Contracting States shall not apply to the movements of such refugees restrictions other than those which are necessary and such restrictions shall only be applied until their status in the country is regularized or they obtain admission into another country. The Contracting States shall allow such refugees a reasonable period and all the necessary facilities to obtain admission into another country.

Article 32. - Expulsion

1. The Contracting States shall not expel a refugee lawfully in their territory save on grounds of national security or public order.
2. The expulsion of such a refugee shall be only in pursuance of a decision reached in accordance with due process of law. Except where compelling reasons of national security otherwise require, the refugee shall be allowed to submit evidence to clear himself, and to appeal to and be represented for the purpose before competent authority or a person or persons specially designated by the competent authority.
3. The Contracting States shall allow such a refugee a reasonable period within which to seek legal admission into another country. The Contracting States reserve the right to apply during that period such internal measures as they may deem necessary.

Article 23 - Public relief

The Contracting States shall accord to refugees lawfully staying in their territory the same treatment with respect to public relief and assistance as is accorded to their nationals.

Article 17 - Wage-earning employment
....
2. In any case, restrictive measures imposed on aliens or the employment of aliens for the protection of the national labour market shall not be applied to a refugee...who fulfils one of the following conditions:
(a) He has completed three years’ residence in the country;
....
(c) He has one or more children possessing the nationality of the country of residence.

Article 34 - Naturalization [and getting the right to vote (and buy AR-15s)]

The Contracting States shall as far as possible facilitate the assimilation and naturalization of refugees. They shall in particular make every effort to expedite naturalization proceedings and to reduce as far as possible the charges and costs of such proceedings.

https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-relating-status-refugees

Article 44 - Denunciation [getting out from under the Refugee Convention]

1. Any Contracting State may denounce this Convention at any time by a notification addressed to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
2. Such denunciation shall take effect for the Contracting State concerned one year from the date upon which it is received by the Secretary-General of the United Nations....

****

What does Trump have to do to get the US out from under the Refugee Convention?

Send (or hand deliver) the Secretary-General of the United Nations a letter!

****

Dear Secretary-General of the United Nations:

I, Donald J. Trump, the President of the United States, on behalf of the United States, do denounce the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol, as permitted by Article 44.

Donald J. Trump


53 posted on 01/16/2026 8:15:18 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheana

Rip her kids from her? Deport those Americans?


54 posted on 01/16/2026 8:19:04 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

“If you immigrate to the US you get 1 year of free stuff then you work or get deported”

No.


55 posted on 01/16/2026 8:26:07 AM PST by dljordan (Yeah, I'm a Boomer and it's all my fault you whiny little bitch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Owen

I didn’t say anything about deportation. I said I didn’t bring her here so not my job to take care of her. If she decides to go back where she came from she can take them or leave them.


56 posted on 01/16/2026 8:27:17 AM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Honestly, I don’t give a rat’s patootie what she does. I just know I don’t want to support another one. Compassion is what got us in this mess to start with.


57 posted on 01/16/2026 8:29:44 AM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: libertylover

well then I hope you are fine with waiting hours in the emergency room and paying 10 times what you should because 50 illegals that can’t pay are ahead of you.


58 posted on 01/16/2026 9:09:20 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: sheana

The kids are Americans. You would force them out.

Lemme get some stats:

Looks like well over half of all green cards are for spouses of Americans. There is no requirement for such a person to have good English. It is perfectly legal for such a spouse to bring a translator to the green card interview.

So, how easy will it be for such a non English speaking lady to become a working single mom paying daycare because her American hubby became an alcoholic? If she is so poor as to require assistance, she won’t have funding to leave the country and pay the plane tickets for her American children, either — assuming they have jobs for her elsewhere and daycare.

The whole idea needs work.


59 posted on 01/16/2026 9:18:23 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

He’ll be against it as soon as the Republicans support it.


60 posted on 01/16/2026 9:23:10 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson