Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado plans to phase out natural gas heating in homes, prompting many reader questions. We have answers.
Colorado Sun ^ | December 17, 2025 | Michael Booth

Posted on 12/22/2025 7:07:03 AM PST by Red Badger

What about propane for rural folks? Do we have to give up gas furnaces and stoves? Who will pay? Will electric bills go way up?

Flames emerge from burners on a natural gas stove, Wednesday, June 21, 2023, in Walpole, Mass. Gas and construction trade groups sued to block New York state’s controversial ban on gas stoves and furnaces in new buildings. (AP Photo/Steven Senne) Credit: AP

================================================================================

News that Colorado has set hard target dates for an end to burning natural gas in our daily lives prompted many “wait, what?” questions from Colorado Sun readers. And we are here to help.

The Public Utilities Commission approved a “Clean Heat Plan” that calls for the state’s natural gas utilities to cut emissions from delivering and burning natural gas by 41% in the next 10 years, and all natural gas emissions entirely by 2050. We talked to state regulators, clean energy officials and advocates, and consumer groups for answers to your most urgent questions.

Q: What about propane? Many rural and mountain Colorado homes have a propane tank. Must those homes convert to expensive electric heating, hot water and cooking appliances, and if so, who pays?

A: The newly approved plans do not cover propane tanks or propane distributors. They task the big utilities delivering natural gas to homes in pipelines with the mandate to hit the targets. That means Xcel, Atmos Energy and Black Hills Energy. Homes using existing propane tanks are not directly affected, though clean energy advocates still encourage those homeowners to seek rebates and other help in converting to more efficient electrical appliances that will be cheaper to operate.

Q: As a homeowner, do I have to do something about my gas appliances or furnace?

A: The new rules are not aimed at homeowners. They are requirements for the utilities. The utilities will be the ones planning internal changes and consumer and business incentives to both limit harmful methane leaks and convince people to switch to electric appliances. Utilities will still be delivering natural gas to consumers, but they must now start taking concrete steps toward gradually reducing use and emissions. If a utility believes it will take hundreds of millions of dollars in rebate incentives to get an adequate number of installed electric appliances, thereby cutting fossil fuel emissions, they would also have to get that spending and potential rate increases approved by the PUC. Under current rules, no one is showing up at your door to rip out a gas water heater against your will.

Q: If I am interested in making appliance changes but don’t have the capital to do it, can I get help?

A: Yes, from multiple sources. In fact, the Colorado Energy Office recently announced new rebates aimed at low- and middle-income households in mobile or manufactured homes. Each utility also has pools of money for rebates for electric appliances. Nonprofits and government agencies often have appliance and weatherization programs that can provide thousands of dollars for projects. The energy office recommends you start here.

Q: Won’t the transformation to all-electrical energy overwhelm current generating capacity, and also raise my electric bills?

A: Certainly the growth in electrical demands — from a host of new EVs plugged in, to giant power-sucking data centers for AI, to electric heat pumps and tankless water heaters — will put more strain on Colorado’s power generation. Utilities are moving to add more generating capacity. For now generation capacity is adequate but tight. That’s why when Xcel’s Comanche 3 coal-fired unit went down, the PUC approved keeping Unit 2 running even though it was supposed to close Dec. 31.

Some groups — not just environmental advocates, but businesses as well — question whether utilities are overstating electric demand, and whether they’ve properly managed the power plants they’ve already got. Expect more questions and more reports on whether the growth in solar and wind clean power sources can match growing demand.

As for rising costs?

“I think people have an assumption that if we’re adding new load to the electric system, that that is going to add a lot of cost. And in fact, that can be true, but it isn’t always true,” Colorado Energy Office director Will Toor said.

He cites studies showing that even without growth in electrical demand, there are fixed costs required in coming decades that would raise consumer electric rates. Those unavoidable costs include a vastly upgraded power line system throughout Colorado to link new solar and wind farms to the grid, as well as hardening transmission lines against growing wildfire risk. If demand is stagnant, then current consumers will have to pay those extra unavoidable costs. If demand grows in a planned and controlled way, Toor said, then the new consumers will help pay for those fixed costs and limit price increases for all.

Q: Can the electrical system handle the planned increase in demand if we give up fossil fuels for cars and homes?

A: It will take planning and growth of clean resources, but the demand news is not all bad, Toor explained. For example, people with EVs tend to plug their cars in the garage overnight, when overall electrical demand drops. Moreover, Colorado is currently a “summer peaking” state, meaning more demand spikes happen in high summer heat when people come home in the afternoon and turn the air conditioning on. If installation of electric home heat pumps and water heaters means more electrical demand in cold winter months, much of that capacity already existed for the summer spikes.

Spreading out the changeover from natural gas through 2035 and 2050 targets, Toor noted, means demand will grow more gradually.

“You still need to make some distribution level investments,” he said. “But when it comes to sort of the big transmission and generation, we’ve got excess capacity in the winter.”

Q: If everything in the Clean Heat plan is so reasonable, why did two state agencies want the timetable for the natural gas switchover to be less aggressive?

A: The PUC settled on a 41% target in cutting natural gas-related emissions by 2035. Environmental groups wanted at least 50% out of the system by then. The energy office and the Air Pollution Control Division, meanwhile, argued for a 30% target for the interim 2035 year.

“The 41% target, from our perspective, is a pretty challenging target for utilities. We certainly hope that utilities get there. I think we thought that 30% was probably more realistic,” Toor said. Reaching the more aggressive target may prompt the utilities to seek more rate increases to pay for their appliance rebates and system changes.

That said, Toor added, the PUC may have a more comprehensive view of cost pressures. Maintaining natural gas systems and extending them to new houses and buildings also require major investments from utilities, Toor noted. Environmental groups call those “stranded costs,” for example paying hundreds of millions of dollars for a pipeline to deliver less and less natural gas each year as the emissions cuts come into play. The utilities’ ability to now avoid those natural gas investments could free up money to pay for the switch to electricity.

“I’m confident that they will be able to strike the appropriate balance going forward,” Toor said.

=====================================================================

Corrections:

This story was updated Dec. 10, 2025, at 6:58 p.m. to correctly describe the Public Utilities Commission's rationale for allowing the coal-fired Comanche 2 unit to continue operating beyond its Dec. 31 shutdown date.

Type of Story: Q&A

An interview to provide a relevant perspective, edited for clarity and not fully fact-checked.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Health/Medicine; Society; Weather
KEYWORDS: coloradical; colorado; crazytrain; demagogicparty; ecofascism; naturalgas; restraintoftrade
Message from Jim Robinson:

Dear FRiends,

We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.

If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you,

Jim


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

1 posted on 12/22/2025 7:07:03 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Idiots. Nat gas beats electricity for heating hands down for 1/5th the price.


2 posted on 12/22/2025 7:09:47 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Read what you wrote. 🤔😊👍. Profits!


3 posted on 12/22/2025 7:11:11 AM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? On hold! Enlisted USN 1967 proudly. 🚫💉! 🇮🇱🙏! Winning currently!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Colorado has jumped the shark.

But reidential wood and coal boilers are making a comeback across America.

4 posted on 12/22/2025 7:12:01 AM PST by Governor Dinwiddie ( O give thanks unto the Lord, for He is gracious, and his mercy endures forever. — Psalm 106)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Let them freeze in the dark.


5 posted on 12/22/2025 7:12:07 AM PST by FatherofFive (We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; george76

Dang - the CaliClowns have totally taken over Colorado!


6 posted on 12/22/2025 7:14:14 AM PST by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Lower cost and higher efficiency (no line losses, no conversion losses).

We know these people are idiots but we just don’t know their limits.

The article reads like “let them eat cake”.

Sickening but really more frightening than that.


7 posted on 12/22/2025 7:14:54 AM PST by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

All the homes I had in Colorado used natural gas heating.

Liberals are morons.


8 posted on 12/22/2025 7:15:25 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
They task the big utilities delivering natural gas to homes in pipelines with the mandate to hit the targets.

Hopefully, people aren't so naive as to think they won't be affected.

9 posted on 12/22/2025 7:16:28 AM PST by libertylover (The HBM (Has Been Media) is almost all AGENDA-DRIVEN and HATE-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
though clean energy advocates still encourage those homeowners to seek rebates and other help in converting to more efficient electrical appliances that will be cheaper to operate.

Breathtaking lies, right in your face.

10 posted on 12/22/2025 7:16:29 AM PST by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The Colorado Sun is working on a series of articles explaining to Jewish folks why concentration camps are really a good thing.

Lol.


11 posted on 12/22/2025 7:16:30 AM PST by cgbg (The master is nice only when the dog behaves as expected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Exactly.


12 posted on 12/22/2025 7:16:35 AM PST by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Let Dems run energy policy and the ultimate result will be freezing in the dark.


13 posted on 12/22/2025 7:17:16 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“Some groups — not just environmental advocates, but businesses as well — question whether utilities are overstating electric demand, and whether they’ve properly managed the power plants they’ve already got.”

Translation: Consumers are expected to use less energy, suck it up and freeze.


14 posted on 12/22/2025 7:18:12 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

I’m glad I got to see Colorado before it went to hell..............


15 posted on 12/22/2025 7:18:20 AM PST by Red Badger (Iryna Zarutska, May 22, 2002 Kyiv, Ukraine – August 22, 2025 Charlotte, North Carolina Say her name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
From the article: ...limit harmful methane leaks...

The government and the utilities want to minimize the truth that they built an infrastructure that's come of age and there's no money to maintain it.

They can't dig it all up the gas lines and replace them so instead they're pushing for the switch to electric.

16 posted on 12/22/2025 7:19:48 AM PST by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Good luck with that heat pump when it’s -15 deg outside.


17 posted on 12/22/2025 7:20:15 AM PST by Freedumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

continued.

Q. Is it true all Jewish people will be sent to the concentration camps?

A. Well, urban Jews will have to go first. It will take a long time to round up all the Jews. If you live in the rural areas you will not have to go until 2050.

Q. Will the storm troopers knock down my door in the middle of the night?

A. In most cases that will not happen. They will politely ask you to join them. As long as you obey orders everything will go smoothly.

etc etc etc.


18 posted on 12/22/2025 7:20:34 AM PST by cgbg (The master is nice only when the dog behaves as expected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

We have 2 woodstoves. We usually only use 1 except on very cold and windy days. We’re fortunate enough to have a good supply, I can cut dead or fallen trees right across the street on about 40 acres of woods, a friend of mine owns the property. We save thousands of dollars in heating from October through March and early April, 6 - 7 months. Nothing like coming in from the cold and warming your bones by the stove, I put my boots and gloves near it before going outside. 3 kettles of water provide humidification. Ceiling fans move the heat so the whole house gets heated. Been heating with wood for 42 years.


19 posted on 12/22/2025 7:22:00 AM PST by Omnivore-Dan (have to )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
A: The new rules are not aimed at homeowners. They are requirements for the utilities. The utilities will be the ones planning internal changes and consumer and business incentives to both limit harmful methane leaks and convince people to switch to electric appliances. ..., no one is showing up at your door to rip out a gas water heater against your will.

Translation, we're going to make the evil utilities pay so much for the privilege of selling you gas, that they will either go out of business, or raise the price of gas beyond the average homeowner's ability to pay. Meanwhile we'll use unicorn farts to meet the increased electrical demand.

20 posted on 12/22/2025 7:22:13 AM PST by nuke_road_warrior (Making the world safe for Nuclear Power for over 20 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson