Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Did The World Get So Ugly? [ Why are ordinary things so ugly, the Victorian Age vs Modernity. ]
Sheehan Quirke Via YouTube ^ | 10/30/25 | Sheehan Quirke

Posted on 12/01/2025 4:13:25 PM PST by Fitzy_888

Video at link.


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; History; Society; The Guild
KEYWORDS: architecture; bolshevism; democrats; london; sheehanquirke; victorian

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: Harmless Teddy Bear

It’s the graffiti that makes it worse.


61 posted on 12/01/2025 6:19:00 PM PST by dfwgator ("I am Charlie Kirk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: newfreep
worth repeating:

THE 45 COMMUNIST GOALS AS READ INTO THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, 1963

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”
62 posted on 12/01/2025 6:20:14 PM PST by bankwalker (Feminists, like all Marxists, are ungrateful parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bankwalker
22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”

Exhibit A


63 posted on 12/01/2025 6:23:22 PM PST by dfwgator ("I am Charlie Kirk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Sometimes the graffiti is actually an improvement.

At least graffiti has color.

Now the bills that they post all over everything make it look like the building has leprosy.

64 posted on 12/01/2025 6:27:56 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (It's like somebody just put the Constitution up on a wall …. and shot the First Amendment -Mike Rowe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Kierkegaard criticized the Lutheran church, that’s OK?


65 posted on 12/01/2025 6:30:12 PM PST by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Fitzy_888

Easy. the Internet allows people to find like-minded people and connect with them. This leads to group think and people becoming less and less tolerant of other ideas, no matter how much they preach tolerance.

Also, the Internet allows people to say nasty things to others anonymously that would get them punched in the mouth if they said it to your face.


66 posted on 12/01/2025 6:33:27 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (No Jesus. No Peace.... Know Jesus. Know peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

This would have been mid-90s. 15 or so years later call it.

We still talk about how brain dead it was. It was literally like 250’ or less door-door.


67 posted on 12/01/2025 6:35:35 PM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Fitzy_888

Why is government art downtown typically large and grotesqu? Is it purposefully dehumanizing?


68 posted on 12/01/2025 6:42:41 PM PST by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proust

Remember when a rainbow was a symbol of natural beauty ... or God’s love ... not faggotry.


69 posted on 12/01/2025 6:44:47 PM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: aspasia

Agreed.

Also, majority haven’t watched the video.


70 posted on 12/01/2025 6:44:54 PM PST by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Fitzy_888

I’ll watch it tomorrow when I can.


71 posted on 12/01/2025 6:46:51 PM PST by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
I am tired of it.

Then don't read her threads. Simple.

We would all be

Speak for yourself. Don't presume to speak for others.

She should exit.

Because uniformity of thought is of the utmost importance and greatest value.

72 posted on 12/01/2025 6:47:44 PM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
IMHO it's selective bias on what old buildings lasted. There were probably tons of Renaissance era buildings that were cheaply made and not designed to be so ornate -- we just didn't preserve those. The nice ones were preserved.

For example hundreds of years from now if someone is trying to assess how nice buildings were made in the past couple of centuries: no one will know about the modest two-story house I live in in north central Alabama because it won't be preserved. But the Arlington House, a Birmingham, Al area 1840s mansion will probably continue to be preserved and remembered and may make people think that our era was nothing but grandiose homes.

73 posted on 12/01/2025 6:51:19 PM PST by Tell It Right (1 Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Good point. The puritanical strain has always been anti-art, anti-beauty for the sake of beauty.


74 posted on 12/01/2025 6:57:54 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fitzy_888

When we stopped using natural materials like wood and stone for buildings.

All this plastic and glass is very cold and uninviting and doesn’t age well.


75 posted on 12/01/2025 7:04:10 PM PST by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aspasia

Roger that!


76 posted on 12/01/2025 7:04:18 PM PST by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

The modern art movement has done NOTHING to give beauty to life.

Seems like all those guys did was see how far they could push obscenity under the guise of art.


77 posted on 12/01/2025 7:07:07 PM PST by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain
Then don't read her threads. Simple.

I don't. This was not "her thread". Just where she decided to whine.

Speak for yourself. Don't presume to speak for others.

Ok, you cuddle her. Might want to get some shots first. But your choice.

Because uniformity of thought is of the utmost importance and greatest value.

Because unhappy whinny bi*ches are dangerous.

They should be encouraged to remove themselves to someplace where they will be happier. If such place exists.

We are not a prison. Flights leave every day.

So do boats.

You can even walk.

No one will stop you.

78 posted on 12/01/2025 7:13:14 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (It's like somebody just put the Constitution up on a wall …. and shot the First Amendment -Mike Rowe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

~13’: “We no longer believe in the idea of ordinary beauty or in the idea of a public that deserves ordinary beauty.”

Bing-Bing-Bing-Bing- we have a winner!


79 posted on 12/01/2025 7:18:39 PM PST by PfromHoGro (Orwell was optimistic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Seems like all those guys did was see how far they could push obscenity under the guise of art.

That was their goal.

I always remember how in the "Great Leap Forward" one of the things the CCP did was make it a crime to have a goldfish.

Because it was something that was just beautiful for it's own sake and great Mao knows we could not have something like that around.

When you look at architecture in America before the 1930s you see a great deal of beauty for it's own sake.

Even after you see people, even poor people, encouraged to make things nice for themselves. From making flour sacks in pretty prints because they knew the poor used them to make clothing to colorful designs on linoleum and full color illustrations suitable for putting up in your house in magazines there were bits of beauty widely available to people who did not have much money.

That started ending in the 1960s when the Anti-Beauty people took control.

80 posted on 12/01/2025 7:26:32 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (It's like somebody just put the Constitution up on a wall …. and shot the First Amendment -Mike Rowe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson