Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

The modern art movement has done NOTHING to give beauty to life.

Seems like all those guys did was see how far they could push obscenity under the guise of art.


77 posted on 12/01/2025 7:07:07 PM PST by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
Seems like all those guys did was see how far they could push obscenity under the guise of art.

That was their goal.

I always remember how in the "Great Leap Forward" one of the things the CCP did was make it a crime to have a goldfish.

Because it was something that was just beautiful for it's own sake and great Mao knows we could not have something like that around.

When you look at architecture in America before the 1930s you see a great deal of beauty for it's own sake.

Even after you see people, even poor people, encouraged to make things nice for themselves. From making flour sacks in pretty prints because they knew the poor used them to make clothing to colorful designs on linoleum and full color illustrations suitable for putting up in your house in magazines there were bits of beauty widely available to people who did not have much money.

That started ending in the 1960s when the Anti-Beauty people took control.

80 posted on 12/01/2025 7:26:32 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (It's like somebody just put the Constitution up on a wall …. and shot the First Amendment -Mike Rowe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson