Posted on 10/23/2025 5:47:11 PM PDT by dennisw
Right-wing provocateur Candace Owens made her boldest claim yet about her former friend Charlie Kirk's assassination in a video posted online Wednesday.
After weeks of spewing conspiracy theories about the assassination, Owens now appears to be explicitly blaming President Donald Trump and members of his administration for Kirk's murder.
'He gave so much of his life to Trump and to politics, and they were just like NOPE. That's it,' Owens said.
'So here's a holiday. What is with them giving them a holiday after they kill them? As soon as they give you a holiday, they definitely killed you. There's no question - they killed you.'
After being snubbed from speaking at Kirk's memorial in Arizona last month, Owens stated that the memorial event, attended by nearly 100,000 people, was 'being controlled by the White House.
'Why would I be invited by anyone in Trump's Zionist administration, as I am speaking about the topics that I am speaking... It's common sense they're not going to allow me to share the stage,' Owens added at the time.
The right-wing podcaster also attacked the Daily Mail for claiming that she was 'snubbed' from the event, but she did not even attend the memorial as a guest.
She has additionally not been asked to join the national Turning Point speaking tour being continued by his friends in Kirk's honor, and has also not joined the podcast being carried on by Kirk's Turning Point USA staff.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Had such high hopes for her, man what a fall
Well, whatever it is, it’s NOT helpful to the conservative movement.
Pretty sad.
Someone Has Gone off The Rails
Tucker Just Ruined Mark Levin’s Reputation With This One Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cakMMhWGh4
Oct 23, 2025 #TuckerCarlson #MarjorieTaylorGreene #DonaldTrump
Watch the full conversation here:• Tucker on the MAGA Movement’s Future and t...
________________________________
Do they want to destroy MAGA?
She needs to be checked for a brain tumor.
Or maybe get on it. She needs to chill.
Tucker gets a 30% rating from me in that video. Plus a certain image was excised from it, ol Tuck chickened out
“She’s right about macaroni’s husband.”
If you believe that, you are an idiot or nuts.
30%? You’re much more generous than I. :-)
I have to admit I watched about half. As I have gotten older my tolerance for nutcases has gotten Much Lower.
Left-wing provocateur Candace Owens
Fact check completed
Owens now appears to be explicitly blaming President Donald Trump and members of his administration for Kirk’s murder.
“”She needs to be checked for a brain tumor.””
***
Nah. Owens, like several others of her “bent”, just needs an exorcist. A good one. One that is skilled in ‘multiple exterminations per session’.
What was cut out of your video was a photo of Cruz and Netanyahu. You can see what was cut out here >>> https://x.com/goddeketal/status/1981197131886317825
Tucker saying that Ted Cruz works for Israel more than he works for America. Tucker is a pos, he was adamantly against us taking out Iran’s nukes project.

This was cut out of your video
So you actually believe President Trump ordered Charlie Kirk to be assassinated? We are "trolls" if we don't promote and believe things like these kinds of nutty, literally insane comments?
And on the other thread you claimed to not be aware she was making comments like this (far from the first) and now you defend them. Why was it important for you to claim she wasn't saying them to defend her credibility, but now also defend the remarks as also being credible? You are all over the place.
No I don't, dumdum..but don't let your lack of intelligence or inferior reading comprehension interfere with your natural desire to spread falsehoods.
Anyone can scroll up and see what you said and the context in which you said it. You literally showed up to this thread and defended these claims by Owens and said she was credible and declared that only "activated trolls" would dispute it and would claim he was killed by a deranged leftist. There was nothing ambiguous about your remarks.
Same as on the other threads - when called out on your comments and being asked to justify them, you claim you actually said something else and we lack ability to comprehend what you said - yet you are not able to clarify what you "actually" meant in making these claims or explaining how our "comprehension" was incorrect. Your pattern of behavior is clear.
You could care less about Ted Cruz, one way or another. But he seems to trigger Tucker.
Well good grief - the man didn’t even know the current population of Iran! That’s a major scandal - and *obviously* relevant to whether or not their production of nukes and state sponsorship of terrorism is a problem worth addressing.
I’m a realist.
Are you a misandrist?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.